I thought we were past talking flavour but let's dive (bad pun intended) into it if you want
The shadows being "indiscriminate with their killing of those seduced." shows that saltwater fishes can also be prey, as also shown by the death of the sailfish. However, I don't see how knowing this is of any relevance. You said it yourself, 
Tobikera wrote:Of course, if pressed by lynch votes, the mafia scum aren't going to admit to being a hammerhead shark, or squid, or even a seal or penguin, all of whom are carnivorous (esp. on fish). But, in an effort to avoid suspicion, if pressed, one of them might choose a freshwater fish that someone else already has as an identity, Then we can act.
It is common sense for scum to do that, unless they are fairly innocuous fishes, which I highly doubt (and regardless of their actual flavour, which I'm not interested in knowing as it would give no information on the setup), and regardless of you pointing it out, we would have known that if someone counter-claims a flavour claim, either of them is scum. Your post is basically useless chatter. Same with your other 2 posts that were only flavour. If there is nothing to gain from discussing flavour, I don't see why you should expect other players to engage with your posts. 
I highly disagree with policy lynching for inactivity. We have enough reserves that inactives should be prodded and replaced instead of policy lynching, for which the likely result is town wasting one day phase and getting no information.
Darin44 wrote:I only agreed to a flavour claim because I need to post and did know what to say
Filler posts are bad. You can't go the whole day phase without saying anything. Now there's been plenty discussion on different cases (jfm, Ragian vs Mets, chap), surely you must have an opinion in at least one of them? We need information on who you're siding with to have a better idea of your alignment later on. Beside, at that point you had either the choice between agreeing or disagreeing with him about a flavour claim. Why chose the former? 
blacky365 wrote:I fully agree with comments above re getting a claim on D1.
Vote JFM
Im slightly worried that this leaves only 3 votes for a lynch, if scum have not yet voted then they can quickly lynch before we even get a claim... is that not a worry?
pika already explained how that's not an issue. If someone hammers before a claim, he'd better be damn sure because he'll be held accountable for the lynch on the next play phases
Pikanchion wrote:Besides, if you want to complain about potentially dubious metagaming then where was your reaction to ZaBeast's this guy is playing like somebody else did one time and they were scum on that occasion...
That was mostly an aside. I had already stated my reasons for voting jfm, and the soft claiming gave me none for retracting it, but I agree I shouldn't have made it look like an argument because it's a pretty bad one.