Moderator: Community Team
Votanic wrote:
Ugh, I posted the quote without my commentary.
Forgive me this one edit.
Sonic, this quoted post is why I thought you found Traf not voting Pixar to scummy. Not trying to put words in your mouth.
...However, your actual quotes are eyebrow-raising enough.
Again and again, you make a lot of assumptions about other players actions or motivations, but I can't follow the logic behind it...
You want to me to take a stand, okay I'll point a finger at you.
I have another theory. If you are the Thing you pretty much know that if you can survive just for 3 days its in the bag like a 90% sure win.
So if i was the Thing i would try to buy me some good credibility on D1. That good cred will get me through the 3 days i need to win. Its just 3 days on cult. Its not 5 like mafia..
And the best way to do that is not to join the Pixar bandwagon but saying that we should test "somebody else". Because today that is just a 1/9 chance it would backfire (if the outcome of "testing somebody else" would result in you getting tested in the end).
But if not, and they choose somebody else to test (on 8/9 odds) you will be trusted so much its pretty much won.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
SoN!c wrote:I have another theory. If you are the Thing you pretty much know that if you can survive just for 3 days its in the bag like a 90% sure win.
So if i was the Thing i would try to buy me some good credibility on D1. That good cred will get me through the 3 days i need to win. Its just 3 days on cult. Its not 5 like mafia..
And the best way to do that is not to join the Pixar bandwagon but saying that we should test "somebody else". Because today that is just a 1/9 chance it would backfire (if the outcome of "testing somebody else" would result in you getting tested in the end).
But if not, and they choose somebody else to test (on 8/9 odds) you will be trusted so much its pretty much won.
Votanic wrote:SoN!c wrote:I have another theory. If you are the Thing you pretty much know that if you can survive just for 3 days its in the bag like a 90% sure win.
So if i was the Thing i would try to buy me some good credibility on D1. That good cred will get me through the 3 days i need to win. Its just 3 days on cult. Its not 5 like mafia..
And the best way to do that is not to join the Pixar bandwagon but saying that we should test "somebody else". Because today that is just a 1/9 chance it would backfire (if the outcome of "testing somebody else" would result in you getting tested in the end).
But if not, and they choose somebody else to test (on 8/9 odds) you will be trusted so much its pretty much won.
I don't get why you suggesting a second 'random' BT choice, instead of going with the first 'random' BT choice, would buy you or anyone, town credibility.
...but maybe I'm not supposed to 'get it'... maybe there is nothing to get, except well-designed (and badly-intentioned) bafflement.
Ragian wrote:I smell a WIFOM argument in, "The Thing wouldn't vote first." Knowing that, surely The Thing would vote early if experienced.
Many people on Dega now.
Charle wrote:I think the quicker we can get a BT, the more time we have to discuss the lynch, and/or getting a claim out as well. So I agree with Ragian, let's get as much info we can for the lynch, but we have to get going with the BT first.
SoN!c wrote:Votanic wrote:SoN!c wrote:I have another theory. If you are the Thing you pretty much know that if you can survive just for 3 days its in the bag like a 90% sure win.
So if i was the Thing i would try to buy me some good credibility on D1. That good cred will get me through the 3 days i need to win. Its just 3 days on cult. Its not 5 like mafia..
And the best way to do that is not to join the Pixar bandwagon but saying that we should test "somebody else". Because today that is just a 1/9 chance it would backfire (if the outcome of "testing somebody else" would result in you getting tested in the end).
But if not, and they choose somebody else to test (on 8/9 odds) you will be trusted so much its pretty much won.
I don't get why you suggesting a second 'random' BT choice, instead of going with the first 'random' BT choice, would buy you or anyone, town credibility.
...but maybe I'm not supposed to 'get it'... maybe there is nothing to get, except well-designed (and badly-intentioned) bafflement.
We agreed in the first days to BT and Lynch everyday. To get the max % to win as town. So if the BT is negative we proceed with a random lynch (ofcourse not including the negative tested).
Also You cant do a 'second random BT' as it is maximum 1 BT a day (game day).
Suppose we were gonna BT Pixar (and assume Pixar is town) surely The Thing would love that right?
But if The Thing takes it one step further he could say no, lets test somebody else. But even then its just 1/9 chance he could be tested himself right?. But very unlikely town would BT the one person that asked this because by asking you look so townie.
And then by doing so The Thing would have scored a lot of town cred
Votanic wrote:SoN!c wrote:Votanic wrote:SoN!c wrote:I have another theory. If you are the Thing you pretty much know that if you can survive just for 3 days its in the bag like a 90% sure win.
So if i was the Thing i would try to buy me some good credibility on D1. That good cred will get me through the 3 days i need to win. Its just 3 days on cult. Its not 5 like mafia..
And the best way to do that is not to join the Pixar bandwagon but saying that we should test "somebody else". Because today that is just a 1/9 chance it would backfire (if the outcome of "testing somebody else" would result in you getting tested in the end).
But if not, and they choose somebody else to test (on 8/9 odds) you will be trusted so much its pretty much won.
I don't get why you suggesting a second 'random' BT choice, instead of going with the first 'random' BT choice, would buy you or anyone, town credibility.
...but maybe I'm not supposed to 'get it'... maybe there is nothing to get, except well-designed (and badly-intentioned) bafflement.
We agreed in the first days to BT and Lynch everyday. To get the max % to win as town. So if the BT is negative we proceed with a random lynch (ofcourse not including the negative tested).
Also You cant do a 'second random BT' as it is maximum 1 BT a day (game day).
Suppose we were gonna BT Pixar (and assume Pixar is town) surely The Thing would love that right?
But if The Thing takes it one step further he could say no, lets test somebody else. But even then its just 1/9 chance he could be tested himself right?. But very unlikely town would BT the one person that asked this because by asking you look so townie.
And then by doing so The Thing would have scored a lot of town cred
Okay, maybe... but that cred (if any) would only come days later (if at all) when the first potential BT candidate was discovered to be town.
I'm not saying your idea is scummy, but it is over-elaborate.
SoN!c wrote:Votanic wrote:SoN!c wrote:Votanic wrote:SoN!c wrote:I have another theory. If you are the Thing you pretty much know that if you can survive just for 3 days its in the bag like a 90% sure win.
So if i was the Thing i would try to buy me some good credibility on D1. That good cred will get me through the 3 days i need to win. Its just 3 days on cult. Its not 5 like mafia..
And the best way to do that is not to join the Pixar bandwagon but saying that we should test "somebody else". Because today that is just a 1/9 chance it would backfire (if the outcome of "testing somebody else" would result in you getting tested in the end).
But if not, and they choose somebody else to test (on 8/9 odds) you will be trusted so much its pretty much won.
Ok, I'm a really getting tired of this. I though you were gonna play it different as u did in the Tick, but no. You are still as off. Come on then everyone BT me and when it comes clean we can all stop reading this nonsensiscal theories that Sonic post.
Stop acting as if u were extremly smart and able to see how everybody would play this cause u are absolutely wrong about me. We will waste our BT today but at least we all know can know who not to listen to.
I don't get why you suggesting a second 'random' BT choice, instead of going with the first 'random' BT choice, would buy you or anyone, town credibility.
...but maybe I'm not supposed to 'get it'... maybe there is nothing to get, except well-designed (and badly-intentioned) bafflement.
We agreed in the first days to BT and Lynch everyday. To get the max % to win as town. So if the BT is negative we proceed with a random lynch (ofcourse not including the negative tested).
Also You cant do a 'second random BT' as it is maximum 1 BT a day (game day).
Suppose we were gonna BT Pixar (and assume Pixar is town) surely The Thing would love that right?
But if The Thing takes it one step further he could say no, lets test somebody else. But even then its just 1/9 chance he could be tested himself right?. But very unlikely town would BT the one person that asked this because by asking you look so townie.
And then by doing so The Thing would have scored a lot of town cred
Okay, maybe... but that cred (if any) would only come days later (if at all) when the first potential BT candidate was discovered to be town.
I'm not saying your idea is scummy, but it is over-elaborate.
I already played this game thinking how everybody would play. So i played it as Ragian, as EW...as everybody i know from previous mafia game and based upon personal knowledge as i know a few. Believe me, its not over-elaborated on Traf. It is exactly what he would do if he was the Thing. And next he jumped away from the BT. Okay - its not much to go on..but what will you get more -more but a random guess- then that?
Also Traf said to better test "somebody else" but never said who or why.. so it was more about getting credibility by posting "test somebody else" then anything else?..saying "test somebody else" but not knowing why (he admitted that to Ragian) is just another random vote in the end.. so why don't you stay with the first random vote then? It does not make any sense unless you wanted to score town credability? Why changing a random vote with just another random vote when you admit you dont know why? (Or dont want to tell the real reason)
TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:SoN!c wrote:Votanic wrote:SoN!c wrote:Votanic wrote:SoN!c wrote:I have another theory. If you are the Thing you pretty much know that if you can survive just for 3 days its in the bag like a 90% sure win.
So if i was the Thing i would try to buy me some good credibility on D1. That good cred will get me through the 3 days i need to win. Its just 3 days on cult. Its not 5 like mafia..
And the best way to do that is not to join the Pixar bandwagon but saying that we should test "somebody else". Because today that is just a 1/9 chance it would backfire (if the outcome of "testing somebody else" would result in you getting tested in the end).
But if not, and they choose somebody else to test (on 8/9 odds) you will be trusted so much its pretty much won.
Ok, I'm a really getting tired of this. I though you were gonna play it different as u did in the Tick, but no. You are still as off. Come on then everyone BT me and when it comes clean we can all stop reading this nonsensiscal theories that Sonic post.
Stop acting as if u were extremly smart and able to see how everybody would play this cause u are absolutely wrong about me. We will waste our BT today but at least we all know can know who not to listen to.
I don't get why you suggesting a second 'random' BT choice, instead of going with the first 'random' BT choice, would buy you or anyone, town credibility.
...but maybe I'm not supposed to 'get it'... maybe there is nothing to get, except well-designed (and badly-intentioned) bafflement.
We agreed in the first days to BT and Lynch everyday. To get the max % to win as town. So if the BT is negative we proceed with a random lynch (ofcourse not including the negative tested).
Also You cant do a 'second random BT' as it is maximum 1 BT a day (game day).
Suppose we were gonna BT Pixar (and assume Pixar is town) surely The Thing would love that right?
But if The Thing takes it one step further he could say no, lets test somebody else. But even then its just 1/9 chance he could be tested himself right?. But very unlikely town would BT the one person that asked this because by asking you look so townie.
And then by doing so The Thing would have scored a lot of town cred
Okay, maybe... but that cred (if any) would only come days later (if at all) when the first potential BT candidate was discovered to be town.
I'm not saying your idea is scummy, but it is over-elaborate.
I already played this game thinking how everybody would play. So i played it as Ragian, as EW...as everybody i know from previous mafia game and based upon personal knowledge as i know a few. Believe me, its not over-elaborated on Traf. It is exactly what he would do if he was the Thing. And next he jumped away from the BT. Okay - its not much to go on..but what will you get more -more but a random guess- then that?
Also Traf said to better test "somebody else" but never said who or why.. so it was more about getting credibility by posting "test somebody else" then anything else?..saying "test somebody else" but not knowing why (he admitted that to Ragian) is just another random vote in the end.. so why don't you stay with the first random vote then? It does not make any sense unless you wanted to score town credability? Why changing a random vote with just another random vote when you admit you dont know why? (Or dont want to tell the real reason)
SoN!c wrote:Could you post something why we should listen to you then? Like contributing something in the search?
Rub / scratch / poke something of your own perhaps? And explain why you wanted to change a random BT on Pixar to a random BT on somebody else?
SoN!c wrote:Well, thanks Traf. Finally you posted something from your heart. And i believe you on this.
If i say something "certain" it is to have a bigger rub / scratch effect. But knowing there is another possibility..there are always lots of other possibilities.
Still i always explained why. And i liked the theory on you. Posting theories is half the fun, and it gets something going.
TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:SoN!c wrote:Votanic wrote:SoN!c wrote:
We agreed in the first days to BT and Lynch everyday. To get the max % to win as town. So if the BT is negative we proceed with a random lynch (ofcourse not including the negative tested).
Also You cant do a 'second random BT' as it is maximum 1 BT a day (game day).
Suppose we were gonna BT Pixar (and assume Pixar is town) surely The Thing would love that right?
But if The Thing takes it one step further he could say no, lets test somebody else. But even then its just 1/9 chance he could be tested himself right?. But very unlikely town would BT the one person that asked this because by asking you look so townie.
And then by doing so The Thing would have scored a lot of town cred
Okay, maybe... but that cred (if any) would only come days later (if at all) when the first potential BT candidate was discovered to be town.
I'm not saying your idea is scummy, but it is over-elaborate.
I already played this game thinking how everybody would play. So i played it as Ragian, as EW...as everybody i know from previous mafia game and based upon personal knowledge as i know a few. Believe me, its not over-elaborated on Traf. It is exactly what he would do if he was the Thing. And next he jumped away from the BT. Okay - its not much to go on..but what will you get more -more but a random guess- then that?
Also Traf said to better test "somebody else" but never said who or why.. so it was more about getting credibility by posting "test somebody else" then anything else?..saying "test somebody else" but not knowing why (he admitted that to Ragian) is just another random vote in the end.. so why don't you stay with the first random vote then? It does not make any sense unless you wanted to score town credability? Why changing a random vote with just another random vote when you admit you dont know why? (Or dont want to tell the real reason)
I quoted and wrote in the wrong place I highlighted what i wrote but here is it again.
Ok, I'm a really getting tired of this. I though you were gonna play it different as u did in the Tick, but no. You are still as off. Come on then everyone BT me and when it comes clean we can all stop reading this nonsensiscal theories that Sonic post.
Stop acting as if u were extremly smart and able to see how everybody would play this cause u are absolutely wrong about me. We will waste our BT today but at least we all know can know who not to listen to.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Extreme Ways wrote:Vote (lynch) Traf
I'm surprised this got an emotional reaction out of Traf while the Tick game didnt get him going like this at all. Admittedly I didnt read Sonic's post until already having written this, but it's not that extraordinary to Sonic's standard - just the same bs. I have a feeling like Traf is very invested in this game because he might be the thing.
strike wolf wrote:Why jump straight to vote though, EW? BT first always makes more sense unless we're completely out of time. I also kindnof get Traf getting fed up with Son!c because it happened to me Day 4 of The Tick mafia. Traf: I'd suggest just blocking him for a day or two. Even if you still end up reading all of his posts, it'll give you a second or two mentally brace yourself.
We are getting to a point where I think we need to push through a BT so that we have time to push through any lynch. I hate to say it but I have no real reads right now. I probably need to read back through but haven't found the energy to do so. Dega or Traf seem to be the only two who have a chance at getting BTed. I'll stick to Dega for now. Though I can't say I have a super strong reason beyond generally agreeing that he's been relatively inactive.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users