Moderator: Community Team
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.

Tomorrow we are dead and you know it..at least your searching..Extreme Ways wrote:I have plenty qualms with Votanic's posts, but a large part of Rag vs Votanic feels personal and not game-related to me. Feel free to pair me with Votanic for today though, just remember that tomorrow everything changes again.SoN!c wrote:Man, you and EW seem to defend each other like crazy.Votanic wrote:Great job Ragian, you've taken your dumb vendetta against me all the way to a lynch vote...
...and look who is the first person to jump on your bandwagon...Sonic!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
Hopefully you're feeling a little embarassed right now.
Votanic: it was agreed we would follow the BT one if he tested negative
I still much prefer a Traf lynch. Or heck, a Sonic lynch. Guess who's laughing on the sidelines?


So you say the Thing is me (how convenient), Charle, EW or Votanic. Also saying "have 0 proofs".. saying "you have 0 proof" is only what the guilty say..TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:Oh Dear. U still continue have 0 proofs but just are shoehorned.
I have given my list of suspects. And I actually eblieve you slightly changed D1 to D2 game play.
I am willing to Lynch Sonic (As jsut mentioned I thing he went for a more aggressive D2 playstile), Charle (Jumping into every bandwagon) or even EW (I agree with strike the thing might try to recruit a smart player) All of them voted for Rag and I think the thing or the converted or both voted for someone to BT as they need it in order to not being bted themselves. I don't think Votanic is the thing but if deadline approach and rag have more insight on him then I might lynch him


Charle, could expand on this by giving a summary of your reasons.Charle wrote:Here is my take on this so far, although I am not sure enough to cast a lynch vote:
The Thing:
1. Traf
2. EW
3. Votanic
Town (could be converted as well but not The Thing):
4. Deg
5. Ragian
6. Strike
7. Sonic
8. Swang
9. Me
You don't need reasoning Votanic. Asking for reasoning when you say your just going with Votanic reasoning in the end is kinda,.. "votanic" you know.Votanic wrote:Charle, could expand on this by giving a summary of your reasons.Charle wrote:Here is my take on this so far, although I am not sure enough to cast a lynch vote:
The Thing:
1. Traf
2. EW
3. Votanic
Town (could be converted as well but not The Thing):
4. Deg
5. Ragian
6. Strike
7. Sonic
8. Swang
9. Me
...and I'd be very curious to hear your reasoning for everybody, not just me.

What the..?? I'd ask you to explain this latest satement, but that is just inviting you to lay down another layer of your BS that makes reasoning in this game that much more difficult.SoN!c wrote:You don't need reasoning Votanic. Asking for reasoning when you say your just going with Votanic reasoning is kinda,.. "votanic" you know.Votanic wrote:Charle, could expand on this by giving a summary of your reasons.Charle wrote:Here is my take on this so far, although I am not sure enough to cast a lynch vote:
The Thing:
1. Traf
2. EW
3. Votanic
Town (could be converted as well but not The Thing):
4. Deg
5. Ragian
6. Strike
7. Sonic
8. Swang
9. Me
...and I'd be very curious to hear your reasoning for everybody, not just me.
No votanic. Its you that has the double standard. You expect perfect reasoning on you but you can blast away any "votanic" arguement on others. Like creating chaos is your marching order. Also not one defence from you on the "recruited part"... like you understand because it is. The more you and Traf post the more obvious it gets. Say i have "0 proof" pleaseVotanic wrote:What the..?? I'd ask you to explain this latest satement, but that is just inviting you to lay down another layer of your BS that makes reasoning in this game that much more difficult.SoN!c wrote:You don't need reasoning Votanic. Asking for reasoning when you say your just going with Votanic reasoning is kinda,.. "votanic" you know.Votanic wrote:Charle, could expand on this by giving a summary of your reasons.Charle wrote:Here is my take on this so far, although I am not sure enough to cast a lynch vote:
The Thing:
1. Traf
2. EW
3. Votanic
Town (could be converted as well but not The Thing):
4. Deg
5. Ragian
6. Strike
7. Sonic
8. Swang
9. Me
...and I'd be very curious to hear your reasoning for everybody, not just me.
Everybody else (besides Sonic): You need to run two separate analyses on this game in your mind.
First, run it with Sonic left in... and then, run it again, but leave out all of his aberrant non-data. I think you'll see they look quite different.

Okay, I've already asked the reasonable players to explain... and I've told the unreasonable player to stop fake-'explaining', so I guess it's...SoN!c wrote:No votanic. Its you that has the double standard. You expect perfect reasoning on you but you can blast away any "votanic" arguement on others. Like creating chaos is your marching order. Also not one defence from you on the "recruited part"... like you understand because it is. The more you and Traf post the more obvious it gets. Say i have "0 proof" pleaseVotanic wrote:What the..?? I'd ask you to explain this latest satement, but that is just inviting you to lay down another layer of your BS that makes reasoning in this game that much more difficult.SoN!c wrote:You don't need reasoning Votanic. Asking for reasoning when you say your just going with Votanic reasoning is kinda,.. "votanic" you know.Votanic wrote:Charle, could expand on this by giving a summary of your reasons.Charle wrote:Here is my take on this so far, although I am not sure enough to cast a lynch vote:
The Thing:
1. Traf
2. EW
3. Votanic
Town (could be converted as well but not The Thing):
4. Deg
5. Ragian
6. Strike
7. Sonic
8. Swang
9. Me
...and I'd be very curious to hear your reasoning for everybody, not just me.
Everybody else (besides Sonic): You need to run two separate analyses on this game in your mind.
First, run it with Sonic left in... and then, run it again, but leave out all of his aberrant non-data. I think you'll see they look quite different.![]()
If you were town anybody saying "you have 0 proof" would sound suspicious and you would wanna know more, but you ignore it completely like you already know

So that is how you look in the mirror?Votanic wrote:Okay, I've already asked the reasonable players to explain... and I've told the unreasonable player to stop fake-'explaining', so I guess it's...SoN!c wrote:No votanic. Its you that has the double standard. You expect perfect reasoning on you but you can blast away any "votanic" arguement on others. Like creating chaos is your marching order. Also not one defence from you on the "recruited part"... like you understand because it is. The more you and Traf post the more obvious it gets. Say i have "0 proof" pleaseVotanic wrote:What the..?? I'd ask you to explain this latest satement, but that is just inviting you to lay down another layer of your BS that makes reasoning in this game that much more difficult.SoN!c wrote:You don't need reasoning Votanic. Asking for reasoning when you say your just going with Votanic reasoning is kinda,.. "votanic" you know.Votanic wrote:Charle, could expand on this by giving a summary of your reasons.Charle wrote:Here is my take on this so far, although I am not sure enough to cast a lynch vote:
The Thing:
1. Traf
2. EW
3. Votanic
Town (could be converted as well but not The Thing):
4. Deg
5. Ragian
6. Strike
7. Sonic
8. Swang
9. Me
...and I'd be very curious to hear your reasoning for everybody, not just me.
Everybody else (besides Sonic): You need to run two separate analyses on this game in your mind.
First, run it with Sonic left in... and then, run it again, but leave out all of his aberrant non-data. I think you'll see they look quite different.![]()
If you were town anybody saying "you have 0 proof" would sound suspicious and you would wanna know more, but you ignore it completely like you already know


Uh, yeah, you are overthinking it... but that's okay...swang918 wrote:Hmm I wonder if sonic vs votanic is the Thing and recruit doing a misdirection song and dance? Probably not right? I got to be overthinking it
Nope, was just rubbing Votanic but he does not want to reply anymore..swang918 wrote:Hmm I wonder if sonic vs votanic is the Thing and recruit doing a misdirection song and dance? Probably not right? I got to be overthinking it


swang918 wrote:Hmm I wonder if sonic vs votanic is the Thing and recruit doing a misdirection song and dance? Probably not right? I got to be overthinking it
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Yes perhaps he got recruited for exactly that reason?strike wolf wrote:swang918 wrote:Hmm I wonder if sonic vs votanic is the Thing and recruit doing a misdirection song and dance? Probably not right? I got to be overthinking it
Vot disagreed a lot with Son!c from day 1. So recruit, recruiter, town that at least has been consistent.


Probably because you come off as arrogant and not an insignificant number of your posts are either non-sensical or whiny like this one.SoN!c wrote:This is my second mafia game. I learned in the first game that the downside of searching means you get suspected BIG TIME. Got no problem there as im confident i can explain all my actions when needed.
ALSO, not searching is achieving nothing in my book..
But: the n1 question is: does searching outways confusing town? Searching (rubbing / scratching) IS attracting a lot of heat..and confuses town a lot apparently.. like Swang and Strike's latest post..
What is the alternative? Not searching , rubbing it and coasting along? Not posting for days/weeks?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
okay. all "whiney", and No difference at all if its rubbing or analytical.. all the same in the end, got itstrike wolf wrote:Probably because you come off as arrogant and not an insignificant number of your posts are either non-sensical or whiny like this one.SoN!c wrote:This is my second mafia game. I learned in the first game that the downside of searching means you get suspected BIG TIME. Got no problem there as im confident i can explain all my actions when needed.
ALSO, not searching is achieving nothing in my book..
But: the n1 question is: does searching outways confusing town? Searching (rubbing / scratching) IS attracting a lot of heat..and confuses town a lot apparently.. like Swang and Strike's latest post..
What is the alternative? Not searching , rubbing it and coasting along? Not posting for days/weeks?

