Moderator: Community Team
Did you read the part about protecting the victims, pee rat? Or are you blind, fat, dumb, and stooopid? Are you drunk too when you post, pee rat?
I use common sense, what I read from reputable sources, and I use Logic and a keen mind to understand the situation. NONE of that applies to our resident pee rat.Pack Rat wrote: Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:56 pm The [ [size=150 victims[/size] want the uncut version of the Epstein Files.
Where in the fukkk do you get your news from? Trump's Truth Social?[/b]
SILLY Rat. Pack Rat wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2026 12:59 pm Don't you feel a bit dirty? Justifying the obvious cover up of pedophilia at the White House and at the DOJ concerning the Epstein Files. All this to protect the perpetrators of raping children?
NOT at all, because your allegations are another feeble attempt at a smear against President Trump, convinces NO ONE here, [especially those who suffer from TDS (Mookie, Duk, you, and an un-named co-conspirator)], and is a DUNG Heap of innuendo, hyperbole, and mostly LIES.
Oh, I have decided NOT to ignore you, at least for now, so that I can promptly fight your LIES.
You are really BAD at this, pack rat, this attempt to debate, analyze, and discussion INTELLIGENTLY. You merely repeat your lies with a few new words or phrases. You are a sad and pathetic LOSER, pee rat.
At least JimB and softRalph showed a modicum of intelligence, but THAT too may be a bit of a STRETCH, especially ralph.
]jusplay4fun wrote: Tue Jan 13, 2026 7:04 am All Duk, pee rat, and others suffering TDS offer are LIES, innuendo, rumors, and allegations, ALL UPROVEN.
IF there was anything there, why did Joe Biden and his DOJ NOT release any such evidence?
OR, why was NONE leaked to the Media during the Biden years?
SIMPLE: There is NO there there.
As far as the Deadline, I have already answered that: There is the matter of the LAW to protect victims of sexual assault. Or did you FORGET THAT LAW in order to TRY wantto embarass Trump?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/bil ... p_catchallBill and Hillary Clinton Refuse to Testify in House's Epstein Probe, Accepting They May Face Contempt Charges
The Clintons will not appear for scheduled depositions as part of the House Oversight Committee’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation
Greta Bjornson
Tue, January 13, 2026 at 12:14 PM EST
pack rat = pedophile perpetratorPack Rat wrote: Wed Jan 14, 2026 11:50 am [b[size=150...says the pedophile protector.
Release the Epstein Files and let's find the pedophile perpetrators![/size][/b]
And pack rat continues to avoid providing ANY evidence and CANNOT refute ONE thing I say, in ANY thread. He merely repeats the LIES that I already refutted. pack rat = LOSERshow me a VIDEO where ONE victim of Epstein accuses Trump of a CRIME. pee rat CANNOT, so ALL this is part of his False Narrative.
Polls consistently show overwhelming public support (around 70-80%+) for the U.S. government to release all of its files on Jeffrey Epstein, cutting across Democrats, Independents, and even substantial numbers of Republicans, who often believe crucial information is being hidden. While there's bipartisan pressure for transparency, recent polling indicates significant disapproval of the Trump administration's handling of the release, with many Americans, including some Republicans and MAGA supporters, feeling the information is incomplete or being mishandled.
The critical portion is enlarged by me. puny pee rat cannot enlarge much, YA know???riskllama wrote: Tue Dec 16, 2025 8:08 pm you are aware that porn is basically free now, yes? you are bad at this, Pack Rat...
https://abcnews.go.com/US/doj-making-su ... =129276165DOJ say it's making 'substantial progress' reviewing additional Epstein files for release
Justice Department officials said in a letter submitted to two federal judges Thursday that they are making "substantial progress" reviewing items related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein -- but gave no indication when additional material would be released.
The letter said "over five hundred" federal prosecutors and staff members from the Southern District of New York and the Justice Department's criminal division are reviewing and redacting millions of pages from the investigations into Epstein and co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.
The review has found "substantial" duplication in various files, so the estimated number of documents is "in flux," the letter said.
"Due to the scope of this effort, platform operations require around-the-clock attention and technical assistance to resolve inevitable glitches due to the sheer volume of materials," said the letter, which is signed by Jay Clayton, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York.
Clayton said prosecutors are working with victims and attorneys for victims to redact identifying information, even if, in some cases, that information was previously public.
"Following a process of conferring with victims and victim counsel about this issue, the Department has confirmed that, to the extent any victim requests redaction of personally identifying information of a document in the DOJ Epstein Library, the Department will redact that victim identifying information even if the document is (or was) otherwise available on a public court docket," the letter said.
The DOJ faced a Dec. 19 deadline for the release of all remaining Epstein files after Congress in November passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act following blowback the Trump administration received seeking the release of materials related to their probe of Epstein, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019.
Materials released to date include a trove of photographs and court records, including a complaint to the FBI about Epstein that was filed years before he was first investigated for child sex abuse, and documents containing previously unknown details about plans for Epstein's 2019 arrest -- but the files have yet to show evidence of wrongdoing on the part of famous, powerful men, against the expectations of many of those who pushed for the files' release.
Duk KNOWS (I am rather sure) that this is another UNPROVEN allegation and innuendo and a smear campaign from those who suffer from TDS.Dukasaur wrote: Mon Jan 19, 2026 9:36 pm Operations require around-the-clock attention to making sure that none of the documents mentioning Trump are accidentally released with the others.
Re: Epstein Client List
Post by jusplay4fun » Sun Jul 20, 2025 12:42 am
This controversy is using up too much oxygen.The Dems are hoping to find something to embarrass Trump, so the question is why wait UNTIL they are out of Office. If there were something there, it would have been released already while Biden and AG Merrick Garland had access to such information.
And release of the grand jury information:
1) likely will take a long time, months likely (see article cited below), and
2) focus on Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell; the focus is not on any "client list"
3) be opposed, especially by some of the victims of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell;
4) will not answer questions about Epstein's death;
5) will not satisfy those conspiracy theorists. They want proof of something that likely has no real proof.
Such people, including Republicans, clamored for years for the JFK files and they basically GOT NOTHING when such files were released. Now they have moved on to another "mystery" that, again, likely cannot be resolved to their satisfaction.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-orde ... testimony/Politics
Trump orders Bondi to seek release of Jeffrey Epstein-related grand jury testimony
I have wasted too much TIME proving the pee rat WRONG on this matter.
Pack Rat wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 12:48 pm [b [i It's been a month since Congress ordered the DOJ to release all the Epstein Files. Trump can immediately release the Epstein Files....what is he hiding?
No there, there?
Some idiotic poster calls everyon[size=150 [/size]e who dares question Trump as a liar and has Trump Deranged Symptoms.
RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES! Show the world that you ain't a pedophile and/or protecting the rich and powerful pedophiles and other sex offenders.[/i][/b]
When will Trump give Maxwell a pardon?
(from Wikipedia)Trump derangement syndrome (TDS) is a pejorative term used to describe negative reactions to U.S. president Donald Trump that are characterized as irrational and disconnected from Trump's actual policy positions.[1] The term has mainly been used by Trump supporters to discredit criticism of him, as a way of reframing the discussion by suggesting that his opponents are incapable of accurately perceiving the world,[2][3] thus making TDS an informal fallacy. Some journalists have used the term to call for restraint when judging Trump's statements and actions.[4][5][6] The term has also come to be used to describe the nature of Trump supporters in their unwavering support of the president.[7][8][9]
Go ponder the implications of THAT, pee puny brained silly rat. Remember: pack rat = LOSER and 
WILLIAMS5232 wrote: as far as dukasaur goes, i had no idea you were so goofy. i mean, you hate your parents so much you'd wish they'd been shot? just move out bro.
Wrong Diagnosis, Mookie; it is actually PRSS, pack rat silliness syndrome;mookiemcgee wrote: Tue Jan 20, 2026 7:59 pm Pack Rat derangement syndrome seems to be rampant in the forums for the last few years
and:Re: Epstein Client List
Post by riskllama » Tue Dec 16, 2025 8:08 pm
you are aware that porn is basically free now, yes? you are bad at this, Pack Rat...
Post by jusplay4fun » Wed Dec 17, 2025 2:48 pm
pee rat fails to have COGNITION on this and nearly every other matter of importance.riskllama wrote: Tue Dec 16, 2025 8:08 pm
you are aware that porn is basically free now, yes? you are bad at this, Pack Rat...
1) TDS and
2) other mental issues.
At least the Llama is smart enough to recognize these things and is willing to TRY to make pee rat COGNIZANT of these serious issues. Llama, where can the pee rat go for help??
