www.skyandtelescope.org copy pastes.

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
HitRed
Posts: 5514
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 12:16 pm

Re: www.skyandtelescope.org copy pastes.

Post by HitRed »

God is knowable.
Spoiler
I come to you in the silence with your heart open to hear my word to you. You listen for my voice like a faithful lamb. Come to rest in me; listen to the sound of my voice, not loud like the world and all of its noise. I speak to those who have ears to listen and to those who seek with earnest hearts. Come to the waters and refresh yourself. Find what you seek with the Lord your God. I truly am God and man, made in the image and likeness of God the Father. Seek me the one true God of Heaven and earth. I am He.
Apatheist
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2025 3:52 pm

Re: www.skyandtelescope.org copy pastes.

Post by Apatheist »

HitRed wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 7:54 am God is knowable.
Spoiler
I come to you in the silence with your heart open to hear my word to you. You listen for my voice like a faithful lamb. Come to rest in me; listen to the sound of my voice, not loud like the world and all of its noise. I speak to those who have ears to listen and to those who seek with earnest hearts. Come to the waters and refresh yourself. Find what you seek with the Lord your God. I truly am God and man, made in the image and likeness of God the Father. Seek me the one true God of Heaven and earth. I am He.
BUT - can he create something that he can't destroy? Can you actually answer that?
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28321
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: www.skyandtelescope.org copy pastes.

Post by Dukasaur »

Silly logic games are an artifact of the limitations of language. They don't prove anything except that our words don't adequately express the concepts behind them.

No, there are far more useful arguments to use against theists.

But the best is still the Hitchens quote, "That which can be asserted without evidence can just as easily be dismissed without evidence."
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
HitRed
Posts: 5514
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 12:16 pm

Re: www.skyandtelescope.org copy pastes.

Post by HitRed »

Apatheist wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 8:09 am
HitRed wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 7:54 am God is knowable.
Spoiler
I come to you in the silence with your heart open to hear my word to you. You listen for my voice like a faithful lamb. Come to rest in me; listen to the sound of my voice, not loud like the world and all of its noise. I speak to those who have ears to listen and to those who seek with earnest hearts. Come to the waters and refresh yourself. Find what you seek with the Lord your God. I truly am God and man, made in the image and likeness of God the Father. Seek me the one true God of Heaven and earth. I am He.
BUT - can he create something that he can't destroy? Can you actually answer that?
I think your question is lazy. Maybe you are hiding behind it. As a scientist are you not compelled to search? Now, here, while on earth. Not waiting to “find out when you get there.”
User avatar
jusplay4fun
Posts: 9086
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Virginia

Re: God exists

Post by jusplay4fun »

HitRed wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 7:05 pm
Apatheist wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 8:09 am
HitRed wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 7:54 am God is knowable.
Spoiler
I come to you in the silence with your heart open to hear my word to you. You listen for my voice like a faithful lamb. Come to rest in me; listen to the sound of my voice, not loud like the world and all of its noise. I speak to those who have ears to listen and to those who seek with earnest hearts. Come to the waters and refresh yourself. Find what you seek with the Lord your God. I truly am God and man, made in the image and likeness of God the Father. Seek me the one true God of Heaven and earth. I am He.
BUT - can he create something that he can't destroy? Can you actually answer that?
I think your question is lazy. Maybe you are hiding behind it. As a scientist are you not compelled to search? Now, here, while on earth. Not waiting to “find out when you get there.”
What he said and what He said:
Isaiah 55:8-9
New King James Version
8 “For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways My ways,” says the Lord.
9 “For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are My ways higher than your ways,
And My thoughts than your thoughts.
JP4Fun

Image
Apatheist
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2025 3:52 pm

Re: www.skyandtelescope.org copy pastes.

Post by Apatheist »

HitRed wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 7:05 pm
Apatheist wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 8:09 am
HitRed wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 7:54 am God is knowable.
Spoiler
I come to you in the silence with your heart open to hear my word to you. You listen for my voice like a faithful lamb. Come to rest in me; listen to the sound of my voice, not loud like the world and all of its noise. I speak to those who have ears to listen and to those who seek with earnest hearts. Come to the waters and refresh yourself. Find what you seek with the Lord your God. I truly am God and man, made in the image and likeness of God the Father. Seek me the one true God of Heaven and earth. I am He.
BUT - can he create something that he can't destroy? Can you actually answer that?
I think your question is lazy. Maybe you are hiding behind it. As a scientist are you not compelled to search? Now, here, while on earth. Not waiting to “find out when you get there.”
That's not even an answer.
All one can infer from that is that you accept that there is a logical paradox that you are unable to refute.
As scientists we are constantly pushing back the limits of knowledge and reducing the gap that has historically been filled by religious guesswork and 1700 year old fan-fiction.
Apatheist
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2025 3:52 pm

Re: God probably doesn't exist

Post by Apatheist »

jusplay4fun wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 8:52 pm
What he said and what He said:
Isaiah 55:8-9
New King James Version
8 “For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways My ways,” says the Lord.
Weren't we supposed to be built in his image though? Shouldn't that have given us the same thoughts and ways?
Anyway, this is just what some slightly more educated people wanted others to believe in order to keep them calm and under control, there's no evidence that anyone of that time said any such thing.

As for what people said:
“I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.”
― Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt: Hitchhiking the Galaxy One Last Time
User avatar
jusplay4fun
Posts: 9086
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Virginia

Re: Pretzel Logic

Post by jusplay4fun »

Dukasaur wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 5:47 pm Silly logic games are an artifact of the limitations of language. They don't prove anything except that our words don't adequately express the concepts behind them.
(...)
It appears that Apatheist ignored Duk's relevant comment here. Apatheist continues to insist that the FOUND the BEST and logical argument that there is NO God. I call his attempt at logic here a failure, pure and simple.
Last edited by jusplay4fun on Wed Jun 17, 2026 5:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
jusplay4fun
Posts: 9086
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Virginia

Re: God probably does exist

Post by jusplay4fun »

Apatheist wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 3:15 am
jusplay4fun wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 8:52 pm
What he said and what He said:
Isaiah 55:8-9
New King James Version
8 “For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways My ways,” says the Lord.
Weren't we supposed to be built in his image though? Shouldn't that have given us the same thoughts and ways?
Anyway, this is just what some slightly more educated people wanted others to believe in order to keep them calm and under control, there's no evidence that anyone of that time said any such thing.

As for what people said:
“I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.”
― Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt: Hitchhiking the Galaxy One Last Time
"no evidence"? I disagree.

And Apatheist missed the point, again. Made is His image does not mean we KNOW that much; I would argue man cannot know anything CLOSE to what God knows, NOT Yet. To me, this is like approaching Absolute Zero.

Let me add another note; I cannot recall citing it recently. To me, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle points to a fundamental limit to what we can know. Yes, that limit, the level of uncertainty, is very small, but like the Big Bang, puts a limit on things.

I like to think I have the AWE of understanding AND the AWE of His Creation; I also know that I am ignorant of LOTS. One can be both intelligent while ignorant. It has been said that when a scientist answers ONE question that at least TEN MORE questions then arise. Again, discoveries lead to more questions and thus more ignorance. One should approach Learning with a sense of being humble and being humbled.

My search for fundamental Truth(s) keeps me humble. I find answers in His Creation (both in Science and as revealed in Religion, too) and in his words (Religion), too. To discard Religion leaves LOTS of understanding OFF the table.

and, from AI:
To understand Bronowski's perspective on Heisenberg's principle, consider the following points:

Bronowski emphasized the philosophical implications of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

He argued that uncertainty is fundamental to the nature of reality and knowledge.

The principle challenges classical notions of determinism in physics.

Bronowski believed it reflects the limits of human understanding and observation.

He connected the principle to broader themes in science and human creativity.

Bronowski viewed uncertainty as a source of potential rather than a limitation.
and more:
Why Bronowski Matters
Fifty years after the broadcast of his landmark documentary series, ‘The Ascent of Man,’ Jacob Bronowski’s plea for tolerance and reason remain as relevant as ever

It was 50 years ago that Jacob Bronowski’s blockbuster miniseries “The Ascent of Man” set a new standard for documentary filmmaking. The BBC had commissioned the 13-hour history of science in part to show off its new color broadcasting technology, and the series featured brilliant cinematography and special effects that were cutting-edge for the time. But the element that made “Ascent” a masterpiece was Bronowski himself.

A superb extemporaneous speaker, with an equal passion for science and the humanities, the 65-year-old polymath ad-libbed large segments of the series, peppering it with the philosophical insights he had accumulated since his student days at Cambridge. And he did so with an infectious enthusiasm that drew viewers in and inspired them with the drama of ideas—especially with his own humanist philosophy of reason, freedom and peace. A half-century after the premiere of “Ascent,” it’s astonishing to discover that while some of the scientific findings it described have been overtaken by newer research, the deeper lessons its host tried to teach remain as timely as ever.
https://www.discoursemagazine.com/p/why ... ki-matters

and even MORE:
Now More Than Ever, We Need Jacob Bronowski

By Ben Fulton

December 8, 2023

My first memory of this wonderful series stems from peeking into the living room of my childhood daycare, where my adult minders were held rapt by Bronowski’s gentle but formidable narration. I read the book by the same name—nearly a transcript of the televised series—in my early twenties. When it was reissued on DVD in 2006, I leaped at the chance to purchase it. I have done my best to watch it every two or three years since. If any one title could be called the “Sopranos of documentary TV,” surely this is it. David Attenborough excelled at bringing intimate shots of the natural world into our living rooms. Carl Sagan may have had more charm to his enthusiasm with Cosmos. No one tells our American stories better than Ken Burns. Still, it is Bronowski who stands atop them all with his universal vision of humanity, his breadth of knowledge, and his quiet urgency.
https://commonreader.wustl.edu/now-more ... bronowski/
JP4Fun

Image
User avatar
HitRed
Posts: 5514
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 12:16 pm

Re: www.skyandtelescope.org copy pastes.

Post by HitRed »

Apatheist wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 3:08 am
HitRed wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 7:05 pm
Apatheist wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 8:09 am
HitRed wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 7:54 am God is knowable.
Spoiler
I come to you in the silence with your heart open to hear my word to you. You listen for my voice like a faithful lamb. Come to rest in me; listen to the sound of my voice, not loud like the world and all of its noise. I speak to those who have ears to listen and to those who seek with earnest hearts. Come to the waters and refresh yourself. Find what you seek with the Lord your God. I truly am God and man, made in the image and likeness of God the Father. Seek me the one true God of Heaven and earth. I am He.
BUT - can he create something that he can't destroy? Can you actually answer that?
I think your question is lazy. Maybe you are hiding behind it. As a scientist are you not compelled to search? Now, here, while on earth. Not waiting to “find out when you get there.”
That's not even an answer.
All one can infer from that is that you accept that there is a logical paradox that you are unable to refute.
As scientists we are constantly pushing back the limits of knowledge and reducing the gap that has historically been filled by religious guesswork and 1700 year old fan-fiction.
You’re not studying God at all, just rejecting Him. Hardness of Heart.
Apatheist
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2025 3:52 pm

Re: Pretzel Logic

Post by Apatheist »

jusplay4fun wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 5:21 am
Dukasaur wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 5:47 pm Silly logic games are an artifact of the limitations of language. They don't prove anything except that our words don't adequately express the concepts behind them.
(...)
It appears that Apatheist ignored Duk's relevant comment here. Apatheist continues to insist that the FOUND the BEST and logical argument that there is NO God. I call his attempt at logic here a failure, pure and simple.
It is BLATANT that you ignored the main point of his comment, which was the Hitchens quote.
My argument is not linguistic, it's a logical paradox, regardless of the language used to express it, which you still cannot refute.
It is also interesting that you write about me rather than to me.
Apatheist
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2025 3:52 pm

Re: www.skyandtelescope.org copy pastes.

Post by Apatheist »

HitRed wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 7:40 am
Apatheist wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 3:08 am
HitRed wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 7:05 pm
Apatheist wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 8:09 am
HitRed wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 7:54 am God is knowable.
Spoiler
I come to you in the silence with your heart open to hear my word to you. You listen for my voice like a faithful lamb. Come to rest in me; listen to the sound of my voice, not loud like the world and all of its noise. I speak to those who have ears to listen and to those who seek with earnest hearts. Come to the waters and refresh yourself. Find what you seek with the Lord your God. I truly am God and man, made in the image and likeness of God the Father. Seek me the one true God of Heaven and earth. I am He.
BUT - can he create something that he can't destroy? Can you actually answer that?
I think your question is lazy. Maybe you are hiding behind it. As a scientist are you not compelled to search? Now, here, while on earth. Not waiting to “find out when you get there.”
That's not even an answer.
All one can infer from that is that you accept that there is a logical paradox that you are unable to refute.
As scientists we are constantly pushing back the limits of knowledge and reducing the gap that has historically been filled by religious guesswork and 1700 year old fan-fiction.
You’re not studying God at all, just rejecting Him. Hardness of Heart.
How or why would I study something that cannot logically exist in the way it is purported to?
Perhaps you should search for a conclusion to that paradox. The only logical one appears to me to be that an omnipotent being can't exist, but I'm prepared to listen if you can PROVE to me that it can - and that proof doesn't include anything from an old book.
I've read your quotes. I was forced into churches and services when I was younger, and forced to study RE at school - and never believed a word of it.
When I was 15, Douglas Adams entered my world, and what he says about life, the universe and everything resonated far more with me than any biblical text.
User avatar
jusplay4fun
Posts: 9086
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Virginia

Re: Pretzel Logic

Post by jusplay4fun »

Apatheist wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 9:48 am
jusplay4fun wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 5:21 am
Dukasaur wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 5:47 pm Silly logic games are an artifact of the limitations of language. They don't prove anything except that our words don't adequately express the concepts behind them.
(...)
It appears that Apatheist ignored Duk's relevant comment here. Apatheist continues to insist that the FOUND the BEST and logical argument that there is NO God. I call his attempt at logic here a failure, pure and simple.
It is BLATANT that you ignored the main point of his comment, which was the Hitchens quote.
My argument is not linguistic, it's a logical paradox, regardless of the language used to express it, which you still cannot refute.
It is also interesting that you write about me rather than to me.
I did write to you. Sorry that you want to put YOUR spin on what I post.

And you ignored it too, until I quoted Duk.

There is not need to refute bad logic.

And do you DENY that you reject God? I think you said so several times already.
JP4Fun

Image
Apatheist
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2025 3:52 pm

Re: Pretzel Logic

Post by Apatheist »

jusplay4fun wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 4:20 pm
Apatheist wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 9:48 am
jusplay4fun wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 5:21 am
Dukasaur wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 5:47 pm Silly logic games are an artifact of the limitations of language. They don't prove anything except that our words don't adequately express the concepts behind them.
(...)
It appears that Apatheist ignored Duk's relevant comment here. Apatheist continues to insist that the FOUND the BEST and logical argument that there is NO God. I call his attempt at logic here a failure, pure and simple.
It is BLATANT that you ignored the main point of his comment, which was the Hitchens quote.
My argument is not linguistic, it's a logical paradox, regardless of the language used to express it, which you still cannot refute.
It is also interesting that you write about me rather than to me.
I did write to you. Sorry that you want to put YOUR spin on what I post.

And you ignored it too, until I quoted Duk.

There is not need to refute bad logic.

And do you DENY that you reject God? I think you said so several times already.
When you write "It appears that Apatheist" you are writing about me. If you were writing to me, you would say "It appears that you".
The logic is perfect. You choose not to see it. It's a very simple "can't do both X and Y if X and Y are mutually exclusive". You need to refute it if you want me (or others) to believe in an omnipotent being.
The Hitchens quote stood on its own, it didn't need repeating.
I am an Apatheist. If you research that, you'll find that I'm not saying there is a god, or that there isn't. It means that I don't care if there is or isn't. I've got no way of finding out in this life, so I'm not going to spend time worrying about it - any more than every time you pick up your smart phone and wonder who invented numbers or the touch screen.
What I'm actually dismissing is religions, because none of them makes sense. I dismiss their claims to be knowledge of, or received from, a deity, since they have been shown to have made statements that we know to be wrong. I dismiss the religions interpretations of events that have natural, normal explanations. Above all, I dismiss religions as a justification for criminal behaviour towards those of a different religion.
User avatar
jusplay4fun
Posts: 9086
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:21 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Virginia

Re: Pretzel Logic

Post by jusplay4fun »

Apatheist wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2026 3:28 am
jusplay4fun wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 4:20 pm
Apatheist wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 9:48 am
jusplay4fun wrote: Wed Jun 17, 2026 5:21 am
Dukasaur wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 5:47 pm Silly logic games are an artifact of the limitations of language. They don't prove anything except that our words don't adequately express the concepts behind them.
(...)
It appears that Apatheist ignored Duk's relevant comment here. Apatheist continues to insist that the FOUND the BEST and logical argument that there is NO God. I call his attempt at logic here a failure, pure and simple.
It is BLATANT that you ignored the main point of his comment, which was the Hitchens quote.
My argument is not linguistic, it's a logical paradox, regardless of the language used to express it, which you still cannot refute.
It is also interesting that you write about me rather than to me.
I did write to you. Sorry that you want to put YOUR spin on what I post.

And you ignored it too, until I quoted Duk.

There is not need to refute bad logic.

And do you DENY that you reject God? I think you said so several times already.
When you write "It appears that Apatheist" you are writing about me. If you were writing to me, you would say "It appears that you".
There was NO offense intended. If I do not quote YOU, then the word YOU is ambiguous. If I say "Apatheist" then I am clearly referring to you. If you were not in this "conversation" I would be talking ABOUT and NOT TO you. We are having a conversation, right?

The Hitchens quote by Duk (in two different threads) received no response, until you claimed (in the past day or so) that I ignored it in this thread.
JP4Fun

Image
Apatheist
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2025 3:52 pm

Re: www.skyandtelescope.org copy pastes.

Post by Apatheist »

I suggest using "you" to reference the person to whom you're replying, and "one" if you are referring to people in general.

To return to the thread: do you get to see a tv show about astronomy called The Sky at Night? It's produced monthly (most months) by the BBC, and this month's was very interesting about space weather. I hope I'm around long enough to see the results from the Vigil satellite: https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Vigil/ ... n_overview.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”