I just saw this in a game and I think it should be changed.
Person 1 had Three cards and then eliminated person 2 who also had three cards. So person 1 now has six cards so he has to trade a set in. But with these six cards he actaully has 2 sets of matches so he is then able to cash both sets in at the same time resulting in quite a few men.
I think that you should only be able to cash in one set. That would put you below 5 cards in your hand and then they could trade them in next turn.
Did I explain that so you can understand it? And what do you think?
i have to agree that thats always how the game has been played but i have always found it interesting that you can turn in double sets and yet if you have one card and take a person with 3 and that gives you a set you cant turn in. I might be mistaken though..
I like the way it is now though. No complaints here
"If winning them gives you 6 or more cards, you must immediatly trade in enough sets to reduce your hand to 4 or fewer cards, but once your hand is reduced to 4,3, or 2 cards you must stop trading."
your r both correct as for takeing a person out with 3 and u have 1 theres no trade in.... and as for new risk rules that is how it is writtin i forgot all about that but the original states that after takeing a player if u collect up to and includeing 5 cards u may trade in as many sets as possible
i think its more of an opinion thing... i personally like the way it is but like i said its just an opinion and there like assholes.. everyones got one and most peoples stink but i do think u have a worth while complaint and should voice it
I believe this is a difference between older rules and newer rules of a certain board games that is similar to conquer club. If someone wants to start a poll about post-elimination set rules then I'd be curious to see if there is a clear majority on the issue. I guess the way it is now is a bit inconsistent with beggining-of-turn set rules.
but i do think u have a worth while complaint and should voice it