Moderator: Community Team
map name.....games to date........last week.......difference.......games/day.....active
Classic........280400...............271900.............85..............461........4800
dominationnation wrote:perhaps if there is a loss in pages then you should put a negative number. for example: doodle earth is very high up even though It lost pages, not gained. If someone skims this they would take it to mean that doodle earth moved up. I would also suggest that you sort it by totall number of pages not the difference. Otherwise it just shows the biggest movers, not who is actually doing the best.
DiM wrote:dominationnation wrote:perhaps if there is a loss in pages then you should put a negative number. for example: doodle earth is very high up even though It lost pages, not gained. If someone skims this they would take it to mean that doodle earth moved up. I would also suggest that you sort it by totall number of pages not the difference. Otherwise it just shows the biggest movers, not who is actually doing the best.
to realize what map is doing the best it's better to look at the active games count or the games/day count. arranging by total games played is not relevant because for example discworld has 69 pages of games while doodle earth has just 38. does this mean discworld is hotter than doodle? no it means it's just been available for a much longer period of time. if you look at the active games doodle has 4 pages while discworld has 1. that means doodle is far more hotter.
dominationnation wrote:perhaps if there is a loss in pages then you should put a negative number. for example: doodle earth is very high up even though It lost pages, not gained. If someone skims this they would take it to mean that doodle earth moved up. I would also suggest that you sort it by totall number of pages not the difference. Otherwise it just shows the biggest movers, not who is actually doing the best.
DiM wrote:dominationnation wrote:perhaps if there is a loss in pages then you should put a negative number. for example: doodle earth is very high up even though It lost pages, not gained. If someone skims this they would take it to mean that doodle earth moved up. I would also suggest that you sort it by totall number of pages not the difference. Otherwise it just shows the biggest movers, not who is actually doing the best.
to realize what map is doing the best it's better to look at the active games count or the games/day count. arranging by total games played is not relevant because for example discworld has 69 pages of games while doodle earth has just 38. does this mean discworld is hotter than doodle? no it means it's just been available for a much longer period of time. if you look at the active games doodle has 4 pages while discworld has 1. that means doodle is far more hotter.
yeti_c wrote:Wow - Doodle Earth has taken off - that has proven the Nay sayers completely wrong...
AoM still strong too... Well done DiM.
Sad that Valley of the Kings isn't going anywhere - I like that one!!
C.
DiM wrote:very good idea as long as it is updated constantly.
Blitzaholic wrote:
also i was hoping someone could let me know the top 5 map makers, who created the most?
Blitzaholic wrote:wow this is more complex that i thought, how would you do this fairly, any suggestions? maybe top 5 names who have contributed to creating or enhancing maps in any form? I dont know, ugh.
cairnswk wrote:New stats for the week ended September 16, 2007 are also loaded at the top of this thread.
DiM wrote:on another note i can't help noticing how some maps are totally under appreciated (votk mongol and CCC) while other maps which are definitely inferior (imho) are played a lot (middle earth, europe, indochina)
cairnswk wrote:DiM wrote:on another note i can't help noticing how some maps are totally under appreciated (votk mongol and CCC) while other maps which are definitely inferior (imho) are played a lot (middle earth, europe, indochina)
if i were rebellious, i'd vote to remove classic for a while, like three months.![]()
![]()
DiM wrote:cairnswk wrote:DiM wrote:on another note i can't help noticing how some maps are totally under appreciated (votk mongol and CCC) while other maps which are definitely inferior (imho) are played a lot (middle earth, europe, indochina)
if i were rebellious, i'd vote to remove classic for a while, like three months.![]()
![]()
yeah and then people would gather in front of lack's house and throw poop on it
DiM wrote:it's about time we got the new stats. a week has passed
cairnswk wrote:DiM wrote:it's about time we got the new stats. a week has passed
DiM...hulmey is supposed to be doing them this weekend...but i'll prepare something from my time tonight, just in case, and post it tomorrow if he doesn't post beforehand.
DiM wrote:i would like to note that doodle earth seems to be the most successful map ever if it manages to continue it's current streak. it gains games faster than world 2.1 which is a first i believe.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: MichelSableheart