...as i like a variety of things.
1v1 is NOT something that interests me much, even in a round-robin or multi-game format. Singles, I prefer mutigame and ranking.
I have only played one doubles game to this point, but it's the start of a tournament... I think team play is an intruiging idea, but it looks like doubles, 3 teams to a map is the only way to reduce the effect of luck in the draw and going first. 2 Doubles teams to a map can leave the game open for pretty brutal exploitation by whichever team goes first.
Exotic formats work... I was actually working on an idea much like the current 3456 league to try and run when that one got posted, so I've shelved it for now, but I like the concept. (as much as I'm getting my head lopped off, I don't know WHY, but I do like it)
I've also considered an odd team concept. Say, 6 groups of 6; one designated captain for each 'team'. publish the 6 games to be played, (map, forts, cards, etc). have the captains poll or discuss with their members, then assign one person to each of the six games, to make points for their team in terms of finishing position.
Could run that one as a league... could even have spare players, and do a fantasy-rotissiere sort of thing, with the 'managers' not actually playing... only with CC players, but that's getting a bit unnecessarily baroque.
