Get shitty dice rolls? Is it the mods evil way of fucking with us?
If anything, I play better now than I did when I first started here, and I can't get my score to budge much past 1600.
I just played the same guy on France in four exact games.
Four turns in a row on one game he went 5v5 against a city he had to break to keep himself in the game, and in all four turns managed to break the bonus AND have armies left over.
Across these same four games, he has cashed for 50 armies versus my 26.
I know the bad rolls stick out more than the good ones, but I'm not talking about single occurrences here, I'm talking about an overall impression that I am getting the shitty end of the stick.
Does the dice analyzer work well? What about a card analyzer?
Herakilla wrote:yes, the less negatives you have the better rolls you get... its the admins way of punishing those who use the cheap tactics on freestyle
The actual statistics:
0-1 negative (Never lose a roll)
2-5 negatives (lose 1/15 rolls)
6-10 negatives (lose 1/10 rolls)
10-20 negatives (lose 1/2 rolls)
20+ negatives (never win any rolls)
Herakilla wrote:yes, the less negatives you have the better rolls you get... its the admins way of punishing those who use the cheap tactics on freestyle
The actual statistics: 0-1 negative (Never lose a roll)
2-5 negatives (lose 1/15 rolls)
6-10 negatives (lose 1/10 rolls)
10-20 negatives (lose 1/2 rolls)
20+ negatives (never win any rolls)
The bolded part is false as I seem to be whacked at times with the bad roll nuke.
I'm back after an all too long hiatus.
Real life sure knows how to intervene.
Herakilla wrote:yes, the less negatives you have the better rolls you get... its the admins way of punishing those who use the cheap tactics on freestyle
The actual statistics: 0-1 negative (Never lose a roll)
2-5 negatives (lose 1/15 rolls)
6-10 negatives (lose 1/10 rolls)
10-20 negatives (lose 1/2 rolls)
20+ negatives (never win any rolls)
The bolded part is false as I seem to be whacked at times with the bad roll nuke.
it's all false.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Herakilla wrote:yes, the less negatives you have the better rolls you get... its the admins way of punishing those who use the cheap tactics on freestyle
The actual statistics: 0-1 negative (Never lose a roll)
2-5 negatives (lose 1/15 rolls)
6-10 negatives (lose 1/10 rolls)
10-20 negatives (lose 1/2 rolls)
20+ negatives (never win any rolls)
The bolded part is false as I seem to be whacked at times with the bad roll nuke.
it's all false.
Well, but you have to consider that the other player might also have no negative feedbacks, in which case the two even out and the dice become random again.
Herakilla wrote:yes, the less negatives you have the better rolls you get... its the admins way of punishing those who use the cheap tactics on freestyle
The actual statistics: 0-1 negative (Never lose a roll)
2-5 negatives (lose 1/15 rolls)
6-10 negatives (lose 1/10 rolls)
10-20 negatives (lose 1/2 rolls)
20+ negatives (never win any rolls)
The bolded part is false as I seem to be whacked at times with the bad roll nuke.
it's all false.
Well, but you have to consider that the other player might also have no negative feedbacks, in which case the two even out and the dice become random again.
