Not the most attentive one here...jay_a2j wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:I don't remember anything about the constitution being against gay marriage and abortion.
Moderator: Community Team
Naturally they want approval. They want to be treated exactly the same as any other couple. They want to have the term "marriage" to show that they're not any less than heterosexual couples. The only reason to restrict them having the term is a religious one, not a constitutional one.luns101 wrote: Homosexual couples can already receive benefits through civil unions here. So why are they so adamant about obtaining that term "marriage"? I think it's because they want approval and endorsement from the government. The legal justification for overturning existing law is once again..."it's my choice to do what I want with my body".
heavycola wrote:if guns kill people, do wrecking balls demolish houses? Are pencils made with the express purpose of misspelling words? If you shoot someone dead with a gun, can you rub it out with an eraser and start again? If i have mindless, ill thought-through platitudes in my sig, will i do myself any favours?
unriggable wrote: Not the most attentive one here...
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Ok Jay. How about this one:jay_a2j wrote:heavycola wrote:if guns kill people, do wrecking balls demolish houses? Are pencils made with the express purpose of misspelling words? If you shoot someone dead with a gun, can you rub it out with an eraser and start again? If i have mindless, ill thought-through platitudes in my sig, will i do myself any favours?
![]()
unriggable wrote: Not the most attentive one here...
I post awhen someone posts something that is stupid, without merit or just plain too ignorant to respond to. (see above
)
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
Is this why so many litter your own posts?jay_a2j wrote:heavycola wrote:if guns kill people, do wrecking balls demolish houses? Are pencils made with the express purpose of misspelling words? If you shoot someone dead with a gun, can you rub it out with an eraser and start again? If i have mindless, ill thought-through platitudes in my sig, will i do myself any favours?
![]()
unriggable wrote: Not the most attentive one here...
I post awhen someone posts something that is stupid, without merit or just plain too ignorant to respond to. (see above
)

Yeah, most supporters of abortion are supportive of there being a time-limit for the abortion. I believe over here it's 14 weeks or 20 or something, but sometimes it's done later because the mother is in grave danger where she will almost certainly die without an abortion.unriggable wrote:Luns it depends on the age of the baby. I'm all for abortion up to a point - 20 weeks or so into the pregnancy. Certainly once it's a ball of cells it should be able to be taken down as it is essentially part of the mother still.
Guiscard wrote:Ok Jay. How about this one:jay_a2j wrote:heavycola wrote:if guns kill people, do wrecking balls demolish houses? Are pencils made with the express purpose of misspelling words? If you shoot someone dead with a gun, can you rub it out with an eraser and start again? If i have mindless, ill thought-through platitudes in my sig, will i do myself any favours?
![]()
unriggable wrote: Not the most attentive one here...
I post awhen someone posts something that is stupid, without merit or just plain too ignorant to respond to. (see above
)
If guns were INVENTED to kill people, are pencils INVENTED to misspell words?
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
True dat...heavycola wrote:And bows suck at shooting sprees, too. You might get two arrows off, three max, before some anti-libertarian shoots you in the head with his nation-protector.Anarkistsdream wrote:Actually, they were invented to hunt animals because they worked better than a bow.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
It is both, since laws have their basis in religious principles.Snorri1234 wrote:Naturally they want approval. They want to be treated exactly the same as any other couple. They want to have the term "marriage" to show that they're not any less than heterosexual couples. The only reason to restrict them having the term is a religious one, not a constitutional one.
It is to the homosexuals.luns101 wrote:Are you saying that homosexuality is normal?

are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.If you're going to take that angle then it all becomes moral relativism. Two things that are directly contradictory to each other can not both be correct at the same time.Backglass wrote:It is to the homosexuals.luns101 wrote:Are you saying that homosexuality is normal?
To me left-handed people are not normal, but to them it is perfectly normal. Should we make all lefties change hands so we can all be the same? Even though it is their preference and they didn't CHOOSE to be that way?
Really, you're actually going to say that laws aren't based on religious principles. What are they based on then?Snorri1234 wrote:No they don't.luns101 wrote: It is both, since laws have their basis in religious principles.
Ok, how so?Snorri1234 wrote:Very much yes.luns101 wrote:Are you saying that homosexuality is normal?
While not always true (take for example some muslim countries), most societies have laws that are good for society and take into account human rights. For example, murder isn't condemned in society because it's against the bible, but because it's just bad for society (imagine a society where people can easily get away with murder) and violates another persons right to live. Stealing is against the law because you violate other people's property. While ofcourse religion sometimes has an influence on the law, laws are certainly not based on religion in that way.luns101 wrote:Really, you're actually going to say that laws aren't based on religious principles. What are they based on then?Snorri1234 wrote:t;]No they don't.luns101 wrote: It is both, since laws have their basis in religious principles.
Because even animals engage in it. Not to mention that the only argument against it is a religious one. Homosexuality is not detrimental to society. It does not harm anyone.Ok, how so?Snorri1234 wrote:Very much yes.luns101 wrote:Are you saying that homosexuality is normal?
I am, yes.luns101 wrote:So in your analogy, you're saying that homosexuals were born that way?
All of my gay friends claim it. The vast majority of gays in general claim it. They are living it...I am not.luns101 wrote:Care to show the evidence to support that if that is indeed your position.
And Xtratabasco has tons of quotes refuting that a 757 hit the pentagon.luns101 wrote:I can show you the quotes that would refute that claim.

are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.I can't tell whether you're joking or not.Napoleon Ier wrote:homosexuality is an improper cancer on society. individuals with damaged psychology are homosexuals, the genetic-inheritance crap makes no sense, itis a construct of bolsho-mediatic press.
Homosexuality is an abhorration of nature, which forms weak half-men. The individual's correct formation must pass through intrisically heterosexual instinct, of finding a woman and starting a family, which psychologically is indispensable the healthy individual in the healthy society. Reproducing his genes, and breeding more children Deo et patriae, must be a cornerstone of his psyche. Without it, there is not enough meaning to his presence in a community. Due to the fact ours is so pathetic, the homosexual illness is tolerated, however, a real society based around the roles naturally intended for man would not.
Backglass wrote:I am, yes.luns101 wrote:So in your analogy, you're saying that homosexuals were born that way?
All of my gay friends claim it. The vast majority of gays in general claim it. They are living it...I am not.luns101 wrote:Care to show the evidence to support that if that is indeed your position.
I believe them.
And Xtratabasco has tons of quotes refuting that a 757 hit the pentagon.luns101 wrote:I can show you the quotes that would refute that claim.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
because the concept of a psychological health for an individual's health and hence by extension for society beyond simplecure of diseases such as schizophrenia escapes youSnorri1234 wrote:I can't tell whether you're joking or not.Napoleon Ier wrote:homosexuality is an improper cancer on society. individuals with damaged psychology are homosexuals, the genetic-inheritance crap makes no sense, itis a construct of bolsho-mediatic press.
Homosexuality is an abhorration of nature, which forms weak half-men. The individual's correct formation must pass through intrisically heterosexual instinct, of finding a woman and starting a family, which psychologically is indispensable the healthy individual in the healthy society. Reproducing his genes, and breeding more children Deo et patriae, must be a cornerstone of his psyche. Without it, there is not enough meaning to his presence in a community. Due to the fact ours is so pathetic, the homosexual illness is tolerated, however, a real society based around the roles naturally intended for man would not.