missed turns - no x multplier

whvingelby · Post by **whvingelby** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:45 pm

I hate it when a player that misses their turn can come back and collect times # of turns they missed multiplier. I think this is dumb. A missed turn should be that they also missed out on collecting their armies. This rewards the people that are actually playing the game.

You want your armies, you play when it's your turn. Otherwise, tough luck.

Strife · Post by **Strife** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:48 pm

All ready suggested. Also next time use the form and Search.

Suggested here.

The Fuzzy Pengui · Post by **The Fuzzy Pengui** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:33 pm

Yeah, suggested many times, rejected many times.

Sorry, not gonna happen

Strife · Post by **Strife** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:38 pm

The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:Yeah, suggested many times, rejected many times.

Sorry, not gonna happen

On the contrary, check the sticky at the top of the forum, or click my link above. It is currently pending, I believe.

The Fuzzy Pengui · Post by **The Fuzzy Pengui** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:42 pm

Strife wrote:
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:Yeah, suggested many times, rejected many times.

Sorry, not gonna happen
On the contrary, check the sticky at the top of the forum, or click my link above. It is currently pending, I believe.

It's still been rejected many times

, but it's now in the process of being reviewed.
It is on the to-do list, but who knows if it will be changed....or when it would be even

There will be upset people either way, but I don't care which way it goes

Strife · Post by **Strife** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:48 pm

The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:
Strife wrote:
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:Yeah, suggested many times, rejected many times.

Sorry, not gonna happen
On the contrary, check the sticky at the top of the forum, or click my link above. It is currently pending, I believe.
It's still been rejected many times , but it's now in the process of being reviewed.
It is on the to-do list, but who knows if it will be changed....or when it would be even
There will be upset people either way, but I don't care which way it goes

I'm sorry I forgot to bold "not gonna happen" I was reffering to that.

The Fuzzy Pengui · Post by **The Fuzzy Pengui** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:17 pm

Strife wrote:
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:
Strife wrote:
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:Yeah, suggested many times, rejected many times.

Sorry, not gonna happen
On the contrary, check the sticky at the top of the forum, or click my link above. It is currently pending, I believe.
It's still been rejected many times , but it's now in the process of being reviewed.
It is on the to-do list, but who knows if it will be changed....or when it would be even
There will be upset people either way, but I don't care which way it goes
I'm sorry I forgot to bold "not gonna happen" I was reffering to that.

Oh lol....well probably not gonna happen for a while if it does

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:36 am

Well, according to the poll the majority wants to keep the armies for missed turns, in one form or an other.