Conquer Club

So long and thanks for the fish!

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby MeDeFe on Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:03 pm

thegreekdog wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:You're misunderstanding or dodging my point, and so I will do the typical thegreekdog route and provide an example.

Country A has a wealth disparity. 95% of the wealth goes to 5% of the population. The overall "wealth" is $100,000. The population is 100.

Country B has no wealth disparity. Wealth is equally distributed among the entire population. The overall "wealth" is $40,000. The population is 50.

Which country is "better off?"

This is my point. For all we say that the middle class is doing poorly, let's take a look at the assets and incomes of the midde class in the US as compared to the middle class in other countries. Alternatively, let's take a look at the assets and incomes of the people in the US by "wealth band" as compared to other countries in the same "wealth band."

I don't think you, or anyone else, can say "look at the wealth disparity in the US" and then make the assumption that something is wrong. I mean, I live here. I see what people have and what they earn and what they spend. Are there people who are struggling? Of course. Do we not want to have such a wealth divide? Sure. Is there a big problem? Nopers.

FTFY

Let's not be intellectually dishonest.


Two requests:

(1) Can you please stop using internet acronyms? I literally have to look them up every single time.
(2) What did you fix? According to google, FTFY means "fixed that for you."

I amended your numbers a little.

But why on earth should I stop using internet acronyms on the internet?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby thegreekdog on Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:10 pm

MeDeFe wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:You're misunderstanding or dodging my point, and so I will do the typical thegreekdog route and provide an example.

Country A has a wealth disparity. 95% of the wealth goes to 5% of the population. The overall "wealth" is $100,000. The population is 100.

Country B has no wealth disparity. Wealth is equally distributed among the entire population. The overall "wealth" is $40,000. The population is 50.

Which country is "better off?"

This is my point. For all we say that the middle class is doing poorly, let's take a look at the assets and incomes of the midde class in the US as compared to the middle class in other countries. Alternatively, let's take a look at the assets and incomes of the people in the US by "wealth band" as compared to other countries in the same "wealth band."

I don't think you, or anyone else, can say "look at the wealth disparity in the US" and then make the assumption that something is wrong. I mean, I live here. I see what people have and what they earn and what they spend. Are there people who are struggling? Of course. Do we not want to have such a wealth divide? Sure. Is there a big problem? Nopers.

FTFY

Let's not be intellectually dishonest.


Two requests:

(1) Can you please stop using internet acronyms? I literally have to look them up every single time.
(2) What did you fix? According to google, FTFY means "fixed that for you."

I amended your numbers a little.

But why on earth should I stop using internet acronyms on the internet?


(1) Why did you add populations to my numbers? That defeats my scenario. Yes, I know that was the point you little communist moderator bastard.

(2) Because I don't understand internet acronyms and clearly you should cater to me, a paying customer.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby thegreekdog on Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:13 pm

By the way, the point here is this - go travel around the US sometime and see how the middle class lives. Then go travel around somewhere else and try to find the middle class. We're good man, we're good.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby AAFitz on Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:47 pm

thegreekdog wrote:By the way, the point here is this - go travel around the US sometime and see how the middle class lives. Then go travel around somewhere else and try to find the middle class. We're good man, we're good.


Have to fully agree there. And the middle class changes by region too obviously even within the US, to the point where I dont even understand why some people live where they do. Granted, I havent moved very far from my birthplace, but living in the Northeast just opens up a great number of possibilities, with many, many options. The weather can be fickle, but its worth the trade off in my opinion.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby PLAYER57832 on Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:31 pm

thegreekdog wrote:As a related to example to BBS's statement... based on the taxes in the current healthcare bill, existing federal taxes, and existing state and local taxes, it is estimated (currently) that wealthy individuals living in New York City could be paying as much as 57% of their income and income-type taxes in a few years. I don't imagine those people will leave New York City, considering that part of the reason they make that money is because they live in New York City. However, those people will certainly attempt to cut costs somewhere... for example, buying less, laying off employees, providing less benefits to employees, and the like.

And yet, they are still getting more benefit than the location is costing them, else they would be leaving. I believe this is because that 57% is going to pay for much of what makes the city function in the way that is beneficial to those businesses.

You cannot have it both ways.. either you pay for services or you get no services.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby PLAYER57832 on Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:32 pm

tzor wrote:No, the dolphins are not leaving; the rich are! They are not going to stand around and take all the taxes that Obama and the Progressives want to throw on them in order to pay with their Statist dreams, so they are leaving. One of the first to announce is the owner of the Independent, a newspaper that covers the Hamptons on Long Island, New York. He is going to sell his 40 million dollar home and move to Tuscany.

Unfortunately the Independent doesn't have that article in text format, but here on page 5 is a copy of the paper where the editor has written the news blurb. First it will be the rich, then what remains of the middle class and only you idiots will be left holding the bag.

The fish in the ear was supposed to allow better understanding of different speech. I think Tzor, you got the wrong kind of fish!
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby AAFitz on Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:37 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:
tzor wrote:No, the dolphins are not leaving; the rich are! They are not going to stand around and take all the taxes that Obama and the Progressives want to throw on them in order to pay with their Statist dreams, so they are leaving. One of the first to announce is the owner of the Independent, a newspaper that covers the Hamptons on Long Island, New York. He is going to sell his 40 million dollar home and move to Tuscany.

Unfortunately the Independent doesn't have that article in text format, but here on page 5 is a copy of the paper where the editor has written the news blurb. First it will be the rich, then what remains of the middle class and only you idiots will be left holding the bag.

The fish in the ear was supposed to allow better understanding of different speech. I think Tzor, you got the wrong kind of fish!


I have to admit I just get this..so im assuming its a joke and I am missing it..but I will point out for anyone that doesnt know, that
so long and thanks for the fish
is from the The Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy, and the only reason I even knew that, was because Someone just happened to mention it to me literally the other day.

I know most know this, Im as much pointing out that I find it ironic that someone brought it up the other day.

You know what...dont bother... I know how bad this post is...just move along...
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby john9blue on Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:50 pm

AAFitz wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:The fish in the ear was supposed to allow better understanding of different speech. I think Tzor, you got the wrong kind of fish!


I have to admit I just get this..so im assuming its a joke and I am missing it..but I will point out for anyone that doesnt know, that
so long and thanks for the fish
is from the The Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy, and the only reason I even knew that, was because Someone just happened to mention it to me literally the other day.

I know most know this, Im as much pointing out that I find it ironic that someone brought it up the other day.

You know what...dont bother... I know how bad this post is...just move along...


I think Player's referring to the Babel Fish and not the dolphins that left Earth before its destruction.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby thegreekdog on Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:08 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:As a related to example to BBS's statement... based on the taxes in the current healthcare bill, existing federal taxes, and existing state and local taxes, it is estimated (currently) that wealthy individuals living in New York City could be paying as much as 57% of their income and income-type taxes in a few years. I don't imagine those people will leave New York City, considering that part of the reason they make that money is because they live in New York City. However, those people will certainly attempt to cut costs somewhere... for example, buying less, laying off employees, providing less benefits to employees, and the like.

And yet, they are still getting more benefit than the location is costing them, else they would be leaving. I believe this is because that 57% is going to pay for much of what makes the city function in the way that is beneficial to those businesses.

You cannot have it both ways.. either you pay for services or you get no services.


They stay in New York because the businesses are in New York. They aren't in New York City because there is some benefit that the city government provides. C'mon...
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby PLAYER57832 on Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:56 pm

thegreekdog wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:As a related to example to BBS's statement... based on the taxes in the current healthcare bill, existing federal taxes, and existing state and local taxes, it is estimated (currently) that wealthy individuals living in New York City could be paying as much as 57% of their income and income-type taxes in a few years. I don't imagine those people will leave New York City, considering that part of the reason they make that money is because they live in New York City. However, those people will certainly attempt to cut costs somewhere... for example, buying less, laying off employees, providing less benefits to employees, and the like.

And yet, they are still getting more benefit than the location is costing them, else they would be leaving. I believe this is because that 57% is going to pay for much of what makes the city function in the way that is beneficial to those businesses.

You cannot have it both ways.. either you pay for services or you get no services.


They stay in New York because the businesses are in New York. They aren't in New York City because there is some benefit that the city government provides. C'mon...

I would say that the businesses are there because New York is such a large city. It is a large city, in large part because of the infrastructure. And, that weighty infrastructure is largely necessary for the large city.

Granted, had New York been designed today, it might function a bit better. However... from Central Park to the subway, to its many museums, to claim the city is the city apart from what makes it THE city is rather disengenuous.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby thegreekdog on Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:57 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:As a related to example to BBS's statement... based on the taxes in the current healthcare bill, existing federal taxes, and existing state and local taxes, it is estimated (currently) that wealthy individuals living in New York City could be paying as much as 57% of their income and income-type taxes in a few years. I don't imagine those people will leave New York City, considering that part of the reason they make that money is because they live in New York City. However, those people will certainly attempt to cut costs somewhere... for example, buying less, laying off employees, providing less benefits to employees, and the like.

And yet, they are still getting more benefit than the location is costing them, else they would be leaving. I believe this is because that 57% is going to pay for much of what makes the city function in the way that is beneficial to those businesses.

You cannot have it both ways.. either you pay for services or you get no services.


They stay in New York because the businesses are in New York. They aren't in New York City because there is some benefit that the city government provides. C'mon...

I would say that the businesses are there because New York is such a large city. It is a large city, in large part because of the infrastructure. And, that weighty infrastructure is largely necessary for the large city.

Granted, had New York been designed today, it might function a bit better. However... from Central Park to the subway, to its many museums, to claim the city is the city apart from what makes it THE city is rather disengenuous.


Nevermind.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby Titanic on Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:13 pm

thegreekdog wrote:You're misunderstanding or dodging my point, and so I will do the typical thegreekdog route and provide an example.

Country A has a wealth disparity. 95% of the wealth goes to 5% of the population. The overall "wealth" is $100,000.

Country B has no wealth disparity. Wealth is equally distributed among the entire population. The overall "wealth" is $1.

Which country is "better off?"

This is my point. For all we say that the middle class is doing poorly, let's take a look at the assets and incomes of the midde class in the US as compared to the middle class in other countries. Alternatively, let's take a look at the assets and incomes of the people in the US by "wealth band" as compared to other countries in the same "wealth band."

I don't think you, or anyone else, can say "look at the wealth disparity in the US" and then make the assumption that something is wrong. I mean, I live here. I see what people have and what they earn and what they spend. Are there people who are struggling? Of course. Do we not want to have such a wealth divide? Sure. Is there a big problem? Nopers.


Irrelevant arguament as I clearly stated this earlier - "the USA having the greatest economic inequality in the western world and the real wages for the middle class being almost stagnant for 30 years."

Just have to ask this, what is it with Americans making themselves feel like the best in the world by comparing themselves to third world nations? Compare yourselves to the rest of the developed world ffs and then see how well you fare.
User avatar
Major Titanic
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby thegreekdog on Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:24 pm

Why is that irrelevant? Do you not understand my comments? Why is wealth disparity, by itself, an indicator that the middle class in the United States is not well-off? You can keep stating the same thing over and over again, but until you answer my question I'm afraid you're barking up the wrong tree.

I'm not making Americans out to be the greatest in the world. There are other priorities in life than wealth. I'm simply responding to your indication that you think Americans are not doing well simply because of the economic inequalities you mentioned.

And I just have to ask this, why is it that Europeans think they are the best in the world by comparing what their governments provide them to what the US government provides to its citizens or, more importantly, because they have greater economic equality amongst the middle class and wealthy?
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby AAFitz on Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:27 pm

john9blue wrote:
AAFitz wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:The fish in the ear was supposed to allow better understanding of different speech. I think Tzor, you got the wrong kind of fish!


I have to admit I just get this..so im assuming its a joke and I am missing it..but I will point out for anyone that doesnt know, that
so long and thanks for the fish
is from the The Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy, and the only reason I even knew that, was because Someone just happened to mention it to me literally the other day.

I know most know this, Im as much pointing out that I find it ironic that someone brought it up the other day.

You know what...dont bother... I know how bad this post is...just move along...


I think Player's referring to the Babel Fish and not the dolphins that left Earth before its destruction.


it was clear she was referring to another joke, and probably even knew where the dolphins were from...i just took the time to mention it for those who didnt know where the dolphins came from...(no creationist/evolutionary jokes please)
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby Frigidus on Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:40 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
Uncle Waldo wrote:You'll NEVER EVER be able to build a country again like the U.S. or better yet what it was and/or had the potential to be. From a global perspective things began to change slightly for the worse 186 years ago. Things really began to get nuts 151 years ago. Throughout that time, no power broker/psuedogod/Zeus no matter how twisted and/or fucked up he was could bring themselves to destroy it (I think alot of them spent alot of time here growing up). And so it was.......


=D> =D> =D> =D>


LOL, totally, things have just sucked since the 1830s. "This country has sucked outside of the first 50 years! I remember when things used to be good...oh wait, I DON'T!"
User avatar
Sergeant Frigidus
 
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby Titanic on Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:45 pm

thegreekdog wrote:Why is that irrelevant? Do you not understand my comments? Why is wealth disparity, by itself, an indicator that the middle class in the United States is not well-off? You can keep stating the same thing over and over again, but until you answer my question I'm afraid you're barking up the wrong tree.

I'm not making Americans out to be the greatest in the world. There are other priorities in life than wealth. I'm simply responding to your indication that you think Americans are not doing well simply because of the economic inequalities you mentioned.

And I just have to ask this, why is it that Europeans think they are the best in the world by comparing what their governments provide them to what the US government provides to its citizens or, more importantly, because they have greater economic equality amongst the middle class and wealthy?


I don't think European nations are the best in the world and never have stated that way. I think certain ones are the best in certain categories, but if you've ever noticed in the "greatest country" threads I will never state that one country is the greatest in the world as its a very subjective term.

When middle class wages have been almost stagnant for 30 years its a very clear indicator that they are not quite as wealthy or influential as they used to be, especially as the economy has grown a fair bit since then. Look at the stats and you see an extremely large portion of the wealth generated since then has gone to the top 5% in particular its fairly obvious that the US middle class is nowhere near vibrant as it was in the past. To put it blatantly higher wealth inequality means that the upper class is taking in a much larger percentage of all wealth generated, hence less income for the middle class. I don't get how its hard to understand that.

This I totally agree with - "There are other priorities in life than wealth"
User avatar
Major Titanic
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby tzor on Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:20 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:The fish in the ear was supposed to allow better understanding of different speech. I think Tzor, you got the wrong kind of fish!


The fish doesn't help with Vogon poetry. It only makes you more insane!
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby daddy1gringo on Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:48 pm

AAFitz wrote:
so long and thanks for the fish
is from the The Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy, and the only reason I even knew that, was because Someone just happened to mention it to me literally the other day.

Actually I think it's the title of a sequel to the hitchhiker's guide.
The right answer to the wrong question is still the wrong answer to the real question.
User avatar
Lieutenant daddy1gringo
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Connecticut yankee expatriated in Houston, Texas area, by way of Isabela, NW PR

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby MeDeFe on Thu Apr 01, 2010 4:33 am

daddy1gringo wrote:
AAFitz wrote:
so long and thanks for the fish
is from the The Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy, and the only reason I even knew that, was because Someone just happened to mention it to me literally the other day.

Actually I think it's the title of a sequel to the hitchhiker's guide.

It's the last message the dolphins left before they vanished. It may also be the title of a book, but I'm not 100% sure of that.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby john9blue on Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:17 am

it is
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby AAFitz on Thu Apr 01, 2010 6:30 am

john9blue wrote:it is


Nice to have that all cleared up 3 pages into the thread. he he...

Page 4: Do we need to give those in the upper percentage of wealth in this country more tax breaks and less taxes, in hopes they will stay and let it trickle down to the rest of the country?

And more importantly, havent the most wealthy been leaving for a while now. And by leaving, I mean buying all products from overseas, moving manufacturing overseas, and outsourcing overseas?

Dont get me wrong, Im a capitalist as much as anyone. Its the only system that can work with human beings, because its the only way to get real production out of them with any real quality that isnt essentially forced. It is a global market, and companies are free and have a responsibility to make money. The point is not that these things need be controlled, only that our tax money should not help them accomplish it, and while its easy to complain about welfare, the corporate grants, the promotional grants and research grants for multimillion dollar companies, all owned by billionaires is staggering. And in addition, the bailouts and bonuses, and tax breaks is no small amount either.

I forget the time period, but at one point the top 5% wealthiest, increased their income 100%, and the rest increased by 8% or so. Giving that 5% tax breaks, and not taking a fair tax from them, after there is no doubt, taxes went to very much help them generate that wealth is just not equitable, and simply results in an unfair system, that obviously needs to be adjusted, but carefully so.

Taxes are absolutely necessary. We have been in a war spending billions for years. We lost over 3000 citizens in a terrorist attack, and we have had the biggest financial crisis since the great depression. We need roads, infrastructure, and often forgotten education. We simply need these things, and we especially need these things in areas that need them most, because there are areas in this country where there is no hope, where crime is simply a way of life, because people simply can see no other way out. Now, taking tax money and just giving it to them is of course equally pointless, however, investing it is not. We compete globally, and our main competitor is china who has a billion people to draw on for labor. Now, we cant possibly compete with that on a pure numbers scale, but we certainly have enough people who need to work, to at least try. We simply need the resources to help the people that can work, find jobs, get trained and compete and contribute above all.

Unfortunately, we have not invested in this correctly for quite some time. We have lived like kings and queens, and have rested on our gold pieces for too long, and have not invested into building the very country that allowed this growth in the past. In many ways, we abandoned it completely in lieu of more, and no doubt selfish endevors.

There is no way the all the dolphins are all going to leave this country. We simply need to tax them, fairly, to help rebuild what once was and what can remain, one of the greatest countries that has ever existed. We need to simply get things moving again, but above all, invest the money where it is most needed, which is essentially creating a viable work environment for US citizens. And I dont mean by controlling it physically or even directly, because that is simply not viable at all... but we can very much devote resources to education, to encouraging jobs, for those people, that are not specifically skilled, so they can help themselves, and help contribute as well.

We simply need to do this, because it is simply the only way America will ever survive, and considering the debt weve accumulated, we need everyone that can, to help contribute...but if people have no hope they will do nothing. If they have no opportunities they will fail. If they are ill, they cannot work. The day Henry Ford embraced the idea of helping his company by helping the lower class contribute, was the day this country began its great climb to glory. He of course did not just give them anything, but simply gave them an opportunity to earn, and in may ways, our country has systematically let that opportunity erode. We have invested our precious resources, and given tax breaks, to companies that do not return very much to the American people at large.

We absolutely have no choice but to invest money into creating a viable work environment. Investment requires sacrifice. Taxes are that sacrifice, and they necessarily need be collected from those that can sacrifice and it is essential that they are used for far less selfish endeavors in the past.

The dolphins simply have to take less fish, otherwise the rest of the ocean will simply be barren, and the entire ecosystem will fall apart.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby PLAYER57832 on Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:27 am

AAFitz wrote:
john9blue wrote:
AAFitz wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:The fish in the ear was supposed to allow better understanding of different speech. I think Tzor, you got the wrong kind of fish!


I have to admit I just get this..so im assuming its a joke and I am missing it..but I will point out for anyone that doesnt know, that
so long and thanks for the fish
is from the The Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy, and the only reason I even knew that, was because Someone just happened to mention it to me literally the other day.

I know most know this, Im as much pointing out that I find it ironic that someone brought it up the other day.

You know what...dont bother... I know how bad this post is...just move along...


I think Player's referring to the Babel Fish and not the dolphins that left Earth before its destruction.


it was clear she was referring to another joke, and probably even knew where the dolphins were from...i just took the time to mention it for those who didnt know where the dolphins came from...(no creationist/evolutionary jokes please)

Actually, I think john9 was actually referring to another tangential joke. But anyway.. my joke flopped. Glad a couple of people at least semi understood it.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby BigBallinStalin on Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:20 am

AAFitz wrote:
john9blue wrote:it is


Nice to have that all cleared up 3 pages into the thread. he he...

Page 4: Do we need to give those in the upper percentage of wealth in this country more tax breaks and less taxes, in hopes they will stay and let it trickle down to the rest of the country?

And more importantly, havent the most wealthy been leaving for a while now. And by leaving, I mean buying all products from overseas, moving manufacturing overseas, and outsourcing overseas?

Dont get me wrong, Im a capitalist as much as anyone. Its the only system that can work with human beings, because its the only way to get real production out of them with any real quality that isnt essentially forced. It is a global market, and companies are free and have a responsibility to make money. The point is not that these things need be controlled, only that our tax money should not help them accomplish it, and while its easy to complain about welfare, the corporate grants, the promotional grants and research grants for multimillion dollar companies, all owned by billionaires is staggering. And in addition, the bailouts and bonuses, and tax breaks is no small amount either.

I forget the time period, but at one point the top 5% wealthiest, increased their income 100%, and the rest increased by 8% or so. Giving that 5% tax breaks, and not taking a fair tax from them, after there is no doubt, taxes went to very much help them generate that wealth is just not equitable, and simply results in an unfair system, that obviously needs to be adjusted, but carefully so.

Taxes are absolutely necessary. We have been in a war spending billions for years. We lost over 3000 citizens in a terrorist attack, and we have had the biggest financial crisis since the great depression. We need roads, infrastructure, and often forgotten education. We simply need these things, and we especially need these things in areas that need them most, because there are areas in this country where there is no hope, where crime is simply a way of life, because people simply can see no other way out. Now, taking tax money and just giving it to them is of course equally pointless, however, investing it is not. We compete globally, and our main competitor is china who has a billion people to draw on for labor. Now, we cant possibly compete with that on a pure numbers scale, but we certainly have enough people who need to work, to at least try. We simply need the resources to help the people that can work, find jobs, get trained and compete and contribute above all.

Unfortunately, we have not invested in this correctly for quite some time. We have lived like kings and queens, and have rested on our gold pieces for too long, and have not invested into building the very country that allowed this growth in the past. In many ways, we abandoned it completely in lieu of more, and no doubt selfish endevors.

There is no way the all the dolphins are all going to leave this country. We simply need to tax them, fairly, to help rebuild what once was and what can remain, one of the greatest countries that has ever existed. We need to simply get things moving again, but above all, invest the money where it is most needed, which is essentially creating a viable work environment for US citizens. And I dont mean by controlling it physically or even directly, because that is simply not viable at all... but we can very much devote resources to education, to encouraging jobs, for those people, that are not specifically skilled, so they can help themselves, and help contribute as well.

We simply need to do this, because it is simply the only way America will ever survive, and considering the debt weve accumulated, we need everyone that can, to help contribute...but if people have no hope they will do nothing. If they have no opportunities they will fail. If they are ill, they cannot work. The day Henry Ford embraced the idea of helping his company by helping the lower class contribute, was the day this country began its great climb to glory. He of course did not just give them anything, but simply gave them an opportunity to earn, and in may ways, our country has systematically let that opportunity erode. We have invested our precious resources, and given tax breaks, to companies that do not return very much to the American people at large.

We absolutely have no choice but to invest money into creating a viable work environment. Investment requires sacrifice. Taxes are that sacrifice, and they necessarily need be collected from those that can sacrifice and it is essential that they are used for far less selfish endeavors in the past.

The dolphins simply have to take less fish, otherwise the rest of the ocean will simply be barren, and the entire ecosystem will fall apart.



QUOTED FOR RECORD LENGTH

YOUR CONTRIBUTION IS APPRECIATED.

On a more serious note, I'd like to read this when I have more time and respond as soon as possible.
Last edited by BigBallinStalin on Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby AAFitz on Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:24 am

BigBallinStalin wrote:QUOTED FOR RECORD LENGTH

YOUR CONTRIBUTION IS APPRECIATED.


Nowhere near my record length.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: So long and thanks for the fish!

Postby BigBallinStalin on Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:29 am

AAFitz wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:QUOTED FOR RECORD LENGTH

YOUR CONTRIBUTION IS APPRECIATED.


Nowhere near my record length.


Oh yeah? what's your record length? 10 "paragraphs?" Must of been a good night.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users