Moderator: Cartographers
It's called "bleeding Cowboy"DiM wrote:what's the font in the legend? i love it.
On the map I use they didn't...Spain was in control of Louisianamuy_thaiguy wrote:You should include Spain, they helped in the South quite a bit (they also had control of Florida).
I don't know if I can keep it like this...maybe I will have to but I think the army circles fit...but names notI GOT SERVED wrote:The only issue I have is that how are you going to fit army numbers in territories like New Jersey, Delaware, Connecticut and RI? They seem really small. Maybe you could merge New Jersey and Delaware, and merge Connecticut and RI. That might give you some extra wiggle room for army numbers
you sure? when I look at this maps it seems that the borders are more straight than on my map but I don't think it's that bad...bryguy wrote:ooks a lot better, thanks for adding Rhode island. the only thing that i can see that is really off is that Pennsylvania is to small in the top left corner


Gnome wrote:It's called "bleeding Cowboy"DiM wrote:what's the font in the legend? i love it.
On the map I use they didn't...Spain was in control of Louisianamuy_thaiguy wrote:You should include Spain, they helped in the South quite a bit (they also had control of Florida).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Brit ... rd1923.jpg
I don't know if I can keep it like this...maybe I will have to but I think the army circles fit...but names notI GOT SERVED wrote:The only issue I have is that how are you going to fit army numbers in territories like New Jersey, Delaware, Connecticut and RI? They seem really small. Maybe you could merge New Jersey and Delaware, and merge Connecticut and RI. That might give you some extra wiggle room for army numbers![]()
you sure? when I look at this maps it seems that the borders are more straight than on my map but I don't think it's that bad...bryguy wrote:ooks a lot better, thanks for adding Rhode island. the only thing that i can see that is really off is that Pennsylvania is to small in the top left corner
Version 6.0
details:
-added army circles
-added names (correct me if I'm wrong)
Needs:
-Can some1 tell how I should call the territories of American England?
-Should I give boats a name or just a number?
-anything that bothers you
At current at least three British American territory names are missing and all fleet names are missing. Once they have names we can move this.Coleman wrote:A. Some sort of clear plan of how production will go.
B. the map must have a working image (either of the small or large map). This working image must be beyond the ‘rough draft’ state. I.E. the working image can’t be a pencil/paper drawing or an MS paint image. To Elaborate:
* Include a working legend with speculative bonuses
* tentative border divisions
* names
* barriers
* colors and textures
* aesthetic images (I.E. compasses, picture designs, etc)
* background image (I.E. ocean or something to discriminate the playing field)
* A map should be ‘inherently unique either in game play, location, or style’ . Maps that aren't just the same tried and true formula from the Classic Map disguised will be more successful.
* Every effort should be made to acquire express written consent for a map based on Copyrighted works. In the event that no response is given by the Copyright holders, the map can still be made, but must consist of completely original artwork.
C. the map (or the post) must also include a few basic things for easy reference such as:
* number of countries currently on the map & number of continents
* descriptions of any unique features or areas
* the title of the map must indicate the page with the latest development of production (I.E. ‘Update – Pg 3, and please, no use of [brackets]: use (parentheses), --dashes--, or “quotes”)
D. the map must have some honest and interested discussion. If no one seems to support your idea or it lacks much appeal, it most likely won’t make it to the next stage.
it did, it helped with defeating the british navy, and did a big part in taking back new york, but just leave that as it is, since u dont have spain in it.Gnome wrote:But than why is france on this map...I'm sure france had to do something with this warps2civxr20 wrote:the french didnt own florida the british did. all the french owned in america at this point was haiti. I think you should change french americas name to british florida and change its background
Ever heard of the Louisiana Purchase? A big territory purchased by Thomas Jefferson from Napolean Bonaparte in 1802 or 1803 I think. Ans Spain DID have control of Florida.ps2civxr20 wrote:the french didnt own florida the british did. all the french owned in america at this point was haiti. I think you should change french americas name to british florida and change its background
ok now i know that aint right, spain didnt do anything in the revolution, didnt do anything in the french india war, and louisiana is kind of hard to give to spain from france if lousiana was controlled by england.ps2civxr20 wrote:florida was spanish but was given to britain as a result of the 7 years war (French indian war in the us) and was given back after the revolution because spain took part in it. Also louisiana was givin to spain by france because france got spain into the 7 years war but it was secretly given back to france during the nepolionic era. So we bought it.
ive already read itps2civxr20 wrote:or we could all just look it up
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_years_war#Peace
this wasnt the first place i learned what i knew

La Gaspésie ou communément appelée Gaspé par les anglophones (en anglais Gaspe coast) est la région du Québec qui couvre, en tout ou en partie, la péninsule gaspésienne située à l'extrême est du Canada, près du golfe du Saint-Laurent.
