Moderator: Community Team
Well then i dont see point of these implementation? Lack need to implement something what will be improvment, not what will be easy to implement.blakebowling
lack is not saying that either suggestion is better or worse. He is saying that the one that was implemented was more simple to code. Yours would take more time to implement.
Improvement on siteload but pain for TO's.SirSebstar wrote:but it already is an improvement on the siteload. so yes = improvement
marginally...patrickaa317 wrote:Improvement on siteload but pain for TO's.SirSebstar wrote:but it already is an improvement on the siteload. so yes = improvement
Can you show me a way to turn auto complete on just for this site? I don't want it on for every single site.SirSebstar wrote:marginally...patrickaa317 wrote:Improvement on siteload but pain for TO's.SirSebstar wrote:but it already is an improvement on the siteload. so yes = improvement
Once you have supplied the info, and you have auto complete on, all you have to do is doubleclick the box and select your previously given tournament, and its done... its that simple. so they have to do one more handling, and thats it.
to set it on http://userscripts.org/scripts/search?p ... tocompletepatrickaa317 wrote:Can you show me a way to turn auto complete on just for this site? I don't want it on for every single site.SirSebstar wrote:marginally...patrickaa317 wrote:Improvement on siteload but pain for TO's.SirSebstar wrote:but it already is an improvement on the siteload. so yes = improvement
Once you have supplied the info, and you have auto complete on, all you have to do is doubleclick the box and select your previously given tournament, and its done... its that simple. so they have to do one more handling, and thats it.
How many other sites require you to change the settings of your browser after they put an "improvement" in their site?
i don't want auto-complete for just this site. if i could set it for just that field on that one page, then sure.SirSebstar wrote:to set it on http://userscripts.org/scripts/search?p ... tocomplete
I assume you could build an extention that could turn only cc on, but i am not sure.. i am not a programmer.
and with regards to your last comment: google,hotmail, facebook, i think i can go on for a while, but yea those at the least..
to set it on http://userscripts.org/scripts/search?p ... tocompleteSirSebstar wrote:[quote="patrickaa317"
How many other sites require you to change the settings of your browser after they put an "improvement" in their site?
Qwert, lack made it very clear that your idea could/would NOT be implemented. There's no reason to keep saying what you believe or not because it's not going to happen.qwert wrote:Still belive that these can be implemented,so that all players can find ,very easy what they search.
should this be moved to rejected then ?Night Strike wrote:Qwert, lack made it very clear that your idea could/would NOT be implemented. There's no reason to keep saying what you believe or not because it's not going to happen.qwert wrote:Still belive that these can be implemented,so that all players can find ,very easy what they search.
Why do you always take everything personally? You make it seem like every person on this site that says or does anything against what you have to say is out to get you. That's preposterous. You MUST understand that suggestions are not only implemented based on community support, but also time needed to implement, load on the servers, ease of use, and finally what some members of the community wish to gripe about. You MUST understand that most suggestions WILL NOT be implemented, simply due to the sheer amount of time required to implement each one. And if the amount of time implementing suggestions takes wasn't enough to reduce the amount of things implemented, lack has people bitching every single time he changes anything on the website. Those of you who play on this site for free, should be grateful lack allows you to do so. Those of you who pay, should at the very least respect lack for what he has created. Because as much as anyone else contributed to the rise of the CC community, none of us would be here without lack's initiative.qwert wrote:well what left to say ,with all these comunity support,mine last word to lack and hes company its ** ** **** *** ******* *****.
Thanks,i hope that i will continue to give you waluable sugestions,and that you will like now reject all mine sugestions.