Moderator: Community Team
Sure, but it's generally the best indicator.tkr4lf wrote:schooling alone cannot accurately gauge a person's level of education.
I would say with the growth of the internet, there is a far greater capacity to self-teach.tkr4lf wrote:Agreed. Just gotta keep in mind that some people who accomplished quite a bit never went to school outside of primary school. They were self-taught. Reading books, gaining knowledge from experience, that sort of thing. But that is much more uncommon nowadays I think.

I've got 41 PhDs and a Bachelors in One-UppingHaggis_McMutton wrote:I've got 40 Phds.
The degree one has is not the best measure of education, not really. I grew up with plenty of farmers, for example, who might not have degrees, but who knew more about not just agriculture, but politics, history, etc than many with advanced degrees. Further, they tended to be less absolute, more willing to listen, to think thye might not have the answer and to be willing to go out and find answers.Timminz wrote:So, I've recently returned to education-land, to up my knowledge, and that got me wondering about the various levels of learnedness among the posters, and lurkers, of the forum that shall not be named.
Same. Starting my 3rd trimester in my first year.rdsrds2120 wrote:Some college/university.
-rd

Quite true. And to self-unteach, unfortunately.nagerous wrote:I would say with the growth of the internet, there is a far greater capacity to self-teach.tkr4lf wrote:Agreed. Just gotta keep in mind that some people who accomplished quite a bit never went to school outside of primary school. They were self-taught. Reading books, gaining knowledge from experience, that sort of thing. But that is much more uncommon nowadays I think.
I see far more of this and its one reason I have come to strongly believe in compulsory education, even though I believe in freedom of thought. Without knowledge, there is no freedom.Woodruff wrote:Quite true. And to self-unteach, unfortunately.nagerous wrote:I would say with the growth of the internet, there is a far greater capacity to self-teach.tkr4lf wrote:Agreed. Just gotta keep in mind that some people who accomplished quite a bit never went to school outside of primary school. They were self-taught. Reading books, gaining knowledge from experience, that sort of thing. But that is much more uncommon nowadays I think.

I don't think ability is the primary limitation. I believe it is desire. Many groups have no desire to truly educate. They just want others to follow their cause, and pretend their methods to convince are "education". (and that applies to groups across the political spectrum, all creeds, etc.)got tonkaed wrote:To be fair, there isnt really any reason why issues of quality of information and information selection skills couldn't improve in the future. As is the case with most technology, people's understanding and application of technology usually lags behind its development.
We are not really talking about that long of a period of time considering the amount of information people now have the ability to access.
