Which is against the rules.

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply

Which do you think is against the rules?

Poll ended at Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:30 am

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
GallantPellham
Posts: 111
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: Jawga
Contact:

Which is against the rules.

Post by GallantPellham »

A
4:21:35 ‹David Hoekstra›
04:21:37 ‹Sackett58› ok, I'm better now
04:21:50 * Sackett58 breath, breath
04:24:23 ‹eddie2› what bollocks bloody ban that map from random
04:24:44 ‹eddie2› http://www.conquerclub.com/gam...9459855
04:24:49 * David Hoekstra quit (timeout)
04:25:00 ‹eddie2› of all the flucked up random maps that has to be it
04:30:26 ‹Sackett58› lol
04:30:56 ‹eddie2› might max time hop[e he deadbeats lol
04:31:24 ‹eddie2› i got all night
04:42:54 * Tisha quit (timeout)
04:45:54 * FarangDemon quit (timeout)
04:50:28 ‹BoganGod› poetic justice me thinks
04:50:47 ‹eddie2› piss off bogan duche bag
04:50:59 ‹eddie2› kiss me arse noi mods

04:51:09 ‹BoganGod› no flaming spurious child
04:51:18 ‹eddie2› go suck jefs cock like you are used 2
04:51:33 ‹BoganGod› gay slurs now is it?
04:51:58 * yb609 joins Social
04:52:07 ‹BoganGod› don't understand all the hate eddie
04:52:27 ‹yb609› what did i talk into
04:52:28 ‹yb609› lol
04:52:33 * bluesrockson joins Social
04:52:35 ‹BoganGod› your jealousy I can understand, but not the blind and stupid hatrid
04:52:53 ‹BoganGod› eddie is just doing his best to bring back flame wars
04:53:01 ‹BoganGod› single handedly
04:53:14 * bluesrockson quit (timeout)
04:53:40 ‹eddie2› bogan you are a prick (cant stand all the hate ) piss off and stop commenting against me then
04:53:46 * Pixar joins Social
04:53:57 ‹BoganGod› its not all about you eddie
04:53:58 * clapper011 joins Social
04:54:14 ‹BoganGod› but keep on calling me names and flaming eddie
04:54:22 * Pixar quit (timeout)
04:54:35 ‹clapper011›
04:54:45 ‹BoganGod› I know you have issues that you need to work out, would prefer it if you did that elsewhere
04:54:49 ‹Sackett58› wb ☼
04:55:02 ‹clapper011› ty sacket
• clapper011
• yb609
• eddie2
• BoganGod
• sekretar
• Sackett58
• drake_259
• Bruceswar
• 04:54:49 ‹Sackett58› wb ☼
• 04:55:02 ‹clapper011› ty sacket
• 04:55:09 * Evil Semp joins Social
• 04:55:17 ‹Evil Semp› helloooooooooooo
• 04:55:27 ‹BoganGod› helloooooo
• 04:55:40 ‹clapper011› hiya semp
• 04:57:22 ‹yb609› clap clap clapper lol
• 04:57:35 ‹clapper011› hiya yb
• 04:58:34 ‹BoganGod› so where has Lord V gone clappy?
04:58:35 * eddie2 grabs a gun and kicks the living shit out of BoganGod chops his head off and sticks it up his arse.
• 04:58:55 ‹Evil Semp› eddie stop it
• 04:58:56 ‹clapper011› BoganGod, I care?
• 04:58:57 ‹clapper011› lol
• 04:59:15 ‹clapper011› eddie, why do you hold grudges so easily?
• 04:59:22 ‹BoganGod› I thought you did clappy, were you only toying with his emotions
• 04:59:51 ‹BoganGod› jealously and deep seated emotional issues, possibly to do with sexual repression
• 04:59:55 ‹clapper011› lol no i was mad that he gave tisha such a happy welcome..and I got a oh hi..
• 05:00:02 ‹clapper011› BoganGod, help?
• 05:00:04 ‹clapper011› lol
• 05:00:06 * nagerous joins Social
• 05:00:12 ‹clapper011› nagggggggggggg
• 05:00:16 ‹BoganGod› hence the constant need to suggest that jefjef and I fellate each other
• 05:00:19 ‹clapper011› now taht is someone I wouldnt mind,....nvm..
• 05:00:26 ‹clapper011›
• 05:00:35 * David Hoekstra joins Social
• 05:00:39 ‹BoganGod› you like jefjef clappy?
• 05:00:49 ‹nagerous› me clap?
• 05:00:51 ‹BoganGod› you wouldn't mind him?
• 05:01:24 ‹clapper011› BoganGod, I was referring to nag
• 05:01:35 ‹nagerous› old worn out horse nag
• 05:01:35 ‹clapper011› jef is megaswoman's lol
• 05:01:43 ‹David Hoekstra› Ahoy Bruces, Sacks, ClaptoTheGreatestGuitarPlayerHeardInPerson, Semp, Nag, et al
• 05:01:52 ‹nagerous› David Hoekstra, old man take a look at your life
• 05:01:57 ‹BoganGod› ah so you noticed


B

Disclaimer
Eddie2, once again this is not about you. Please feel free to start another spurious C&A report, or maybe just cast more uncalled for bigoted gay slurs against myself and a former clan member next time you see me in live chat. Just what ever helps you feel better about yourself, I'm glad to be here to help. Focus your hatred on me, not yourself. That is a good chap



Polls will be open for 2weeks, this ain't Chicago just vote once.

Eddie2 this IS about you
User avatar
jimboston
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by jimboston »

I voted "A".

That said... "B" could be considered baiting.
User avatar
JoshyBoy
Posts: 3750
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 6:04 pm
Gender: Male
Location: In the gym. Yeah, still there.

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by JoshyBoy »

I voted "A". That's pretty strong hatred being directed towards Bogan there. "B" could possibly, by some stretch of the imagination, be considered baiting.
drunkmonkey wrote:I honestly wonder why anyone becomes a mod on this site. You're the whiniest bunch of players imaginable.
Ron Burgundy wrote:Why don't you go back to your home on Whore Island?
User avatar
Ace Rimmer
Posts: 1911
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:22 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by Ace Rimmer »

1 vote for B, I bet it was eddie.
User avatar
JoshyBoy
Posts: 3750
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 6:04 pm
Gender: Male
Location: In the gym. Yeah, still there.

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by JoshyBoy »

Ace Rimmer wrote:1 vote for B, I bet it was eddie.
No, my guess is that he hasn't seen this yet. If he had, he would have replied. You can bet on that.
drunkmonkey wrote:I honestly wonder why anyone becomes a mod on this site. You're the whiniest bunch of players imaginable.
Ron Burgundy wrote:Why don't you go back to your home on Whore Island?
User avatar
GallantPellham
Posts: 111
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: Jawga
Contact:

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by GallantPellham »

JoshyBoy wrote:I voted "A". That's pretty strong hatred being directed towards Bogan there. "B" could possibly, by some stretch of the imagination, be considered baiting.
I've heard,by some very reliable sources, that Bogan is a master baiter.
User avatar
JoshyBoy
Posts: 3750
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 6:04 pm
Gender: Male
Location: In the gym. Yeah, still there.

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by JoshyBoy »

GallantPellham wrote:I've heard,by some very reliable sources, that Bogan is a master baiter.
Well I heard he was a mass debater. :)
drunkmonkey wrote:I honestly wonder why anyone becomes a mod on this site. You're the whiniest bunch of players imaginable.
Ron Burgundy wrote:Why don't you go back to your home on Whore Island?
User avatar
oVo
Posts: 3858
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by oVo »

I don't think eddie2's small penis should be the subject of public debate.
User avatar
GallantPellham
Posts: 111
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: Jawga
Contact:

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by GallantPellham »

oVo wrote:I don't think eddie2's small penis should be the subject of public debate.
your the first one, to mention his inch and a half of rusty steel needle.
User avatar
oVo
Posts: 3858
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by oVo »

I was caught up in the stereotype where small minds with matching members
have big mouths to compensate.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3075
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by PLAYER57832 »

I believe both would be considered OK, in honesty. I would say both should be not OK, though.
User avatar
GallantPellham
Posts: 111
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: Jawga
Contact:

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by GallantPellham »

PLAYER57832 wrote:I believe both would be considered OK, in honesty. I would say both should be not OK, though.
are you in congress?
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3075
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by PLAYER57832 »

GallantPellham wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:I believe both would be considered OK, in honesty. I would say both should be not OK, though.
are you in congress?
They are likely considered OK by CC, but I don't think they should be.. nothing inconsistant about that.
Army of GOD
Posts: 7178
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by Army of GOD »

A is flaming, B is baiting.

Whether their severity is equivalent is an entirely different and unanswerable question. Baiting is much more passive than flaming.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Victor Sullivan
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Columbus, OH
Contact:

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by Victor Sullivan »

Army of GOD wrote:A is flaming, B is baiting.

Whether their severity is equivalent is an entirely different and unanswerable question. Baiting is much more passive than flaming.
+1 to Army of GOD?!?

-Sully
User avatar
jimboston
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by jimboston »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
GallantPellham wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:I believe both would be considered OK, in honesty. I would say both should be not OK, though.
are you in congress?
They are likely considered OK by CC, but I don't think they should be.. nothing inconsistant about that.
What is the "in honesty" for?

It makes no sense being there and disrupts your intended meaning.

Oh wait... It's Player.... Sorry I got confused for a moment, and thought your posts were supposed to make sense. My bad!
User avatar
oVo
Posts: 3858
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by oVo »

"In honesty" I understand his sentiments
as he was expressing a personal opinion.

Blitzaholic should probably receive a one month ban
for allowing this travesty of equality to occur.
User avatar
MegasWoman
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:29 am
Gender: Female
Location: Texas

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by MegasWoman »

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Poor Bogan...to question his manhood like that....now if you and JJ would stop spending so much time in the captains quarters people wouldn't be spreading these nasty rumors. How are they to know you are down there playing chess?
Click image to enlarge.
image
][/color]
LIVE well, LAUGH often, LOVE much...[/color]
Tourney win D-Day 6000+ Triples
Tourney win 2v2 Series - Japan
Winner! Map Champ Challenge Tournament # 3 - Egypt-Nubia
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3075
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by PLAYER57832 »

jimboston wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
GallantPellham wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:I believe both would be considered OK, in honesty. I would say both should be not OK, though.
are you in congress?
They are likely considered OK by CC, but I don't think they should be.. nothing inconsistant about that.
What is the "in honesty" for?

It makes no sense being there and disrupts your intended meaning.

Oh wait... It's Player.... Sorry I got confused for a moment, and thought your posts were supposed to make sense. My bad!
Sorry, I go on the assumption most people here (at least those in the US, Canada and the UK) are proficient in English. I do take the time to explain to non-English speakers, but generally cannot be bothered with those who just never paid attention in elementary school
User avatar
jimboston
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by jimboston »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
jimboston wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
GallantPellham wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:I believe both would be considered OK, in honesty. I would say both should be not OK, though.
are you in congress?
They are likely considered OK by CC, but I don't think they should be.. nothing inconsistant about that.
What is the "in honesty" for?

It makes no sense being there and disrupts your intended meaning.

Oh wait... It's Player.... Sorry I got confused for a moment, and thought your posts were supposed to make sense. My bad!
Sorry, I go on the assumption most people here (at least those in the US, Canada and the UK) are proficient in English. I do take the time to explain to non-English speakers, but generally cannot be bothered with those who just never paid attention in elementary school
The phrase or term "in honesty" makes absolutely NO SENSE in your response.

Perhaps you mean "IMHO" or "by Conquer Club standards". I don't know... because you type "in honesty" instead.

Also, IMHO, I find that people who use the word "honestly" when they are telling me something are often lying.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5071
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: Which is against the rules.

Post by BigBallinStalin »

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”