Moderator: Community Team
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.
shit was badass
He actually won the humanitarian award that the NFL gives out last year...Gold Knight wrote:First thing, the contract is only $40 million guaranteed, of which the other $60mil likely has some lofty expectations. Secondly, yes. His contract and affiliation with the Eagles and the NFL has nothing to do with his life outside of football; past, present, or future. His current and previous contracts never had any clauses about dogfighting or other illegal acts, nor should they. There is a seperation between one's personal life and their profession. Sure, Vick did some shitty things in his life and probably wont be getting any humanitarian awards, but that has nothing to do with his ability to play the game, which is what he is paid for. Not to mention he is one of the few complete game-changers in the NFL, his value to Philly is obviously worth the risk of his previous lifestyle choices.
Yep.Symmetry wrote:If you're not a fan of American football? No.
If you're a fan of American football? Maybe.
This was the dude that murdered pets for money though right?

Sure, but the question is about what he deserves rather than what he's paid for at the moment.QoH wrote:Yep.Symmetry wrote:If you're not a fan of American football? No.
If you're a fan of American football? Maybe.
This was the dude that murdered pets for money though right?
And he's being paid to play football, not be nice to animals.
It should be noted though, that I was fully against what Vick did to the dogs, I"m just saying his past life doesn't play a role in his present life, in terms of business.

Apologies- I was responding to the subject of the thread, and didn't realise that it wasn't about him deserving his $100 million dollars.QoH wrote:The wuestion is whether he deserves $100 million dollars for PLAYING FOOTBALL...
...something he does very well. The Eagles are prepared to risk a ton of money investing with him, since he's going to get hurt the way he plays.

Apologies, but the original question was "Does Mike Vick deserve his $100 million dollars"?QoH wrote:You're forgiven
But you kind of twisted the wording a little (at least in my opinion) to make it not exactly what the original question was. I don't know.
wildwilliam? Is that you?rockfist wrote:Who am I to say how much money anyone should make?
President of the United States.patrickaa317 wrote:The amount anyone makes for doing any job is based on their replace-ability.
Symmetry wrote:President of the United States.patrickaa317 wrote:The amount anyone makes for doing any job is based on their replace-ability.
I'm personally opposed to the president being involved in government, sounds like the president being involved in government to me.BigBallinStalin wrote:Symmetry wrote:President of the United States.patrickaa317 wrote:The amount anyone makes for doing any job is based on their replace-ability.
(Assuming that there's no state-regulated price controls.)
Don't be preposterous! Clearly, the President was crucial to the development of Systems Theory, and for anyone to suggest that he wasn't, he's batshit insane.Symmetry wrote:I'm personally opposed to the president being involved in government, sounds like the president being involved in government to me.BigBallinStalin wrote:Symmetry wrote:President of the United States.patrickaa317 wrote:The amount anyone makes for doing any job is based on their replace-ability.
(Assuming that there's no state-regulated price controls.)
If you're for (or against) the president being involved in government, I think you'll agree with me that the president should be doing less or perhaps more of whatever he's doing. Or she.
Basically he's being paid too much, or hasn't received enough recognition. Or both. Or both are lies.
Neither of them are lies, and he is a she.
Their are exceptions to this which would primarily include politicians and unions. Politicians in the fact they can vote for their own pay raise and unions in the fact that individuals are paid based on seniority.Symmetry wrote:President of the United States.patrickaa317 wrote:The amount anyone makes for doing any job is based on their replace-ability.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.

Why did you let Johnny Rockets haxxor your account???neanderpaul14 wrote:He deserves to be in jail. Or better yet he deserves to be dropped into a cage filled with dogs and torn limb from limb. That would be justice.
I agree, but unless you only watch independent films and such were the actors need another job just to live, then it's kind of hypocritical. Being a football player is a lot harder than acting (I think, I don't know personally though, I just have played football) yet actors make ridiculous amount of money as well. But people, especially football fans, are never going to stop watching games. Just like in the days of the Coliseum, people want to see blood.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I suppose whether he "deserves" the money depends on how much business he can bring to the team. Apparently whomever is signing the checks thinks he can bring the win and therefore the revenue, through ticket and merchandise sales, advertising, etc.
I'm sure BBS will back me up here.
But other than that I couldn't give a f*ck about football. The fact that a player potentially CAN make $100 million by running around on a field seems odd to me. Just goes to show how many of you are getting suckered into paying for tickets, seats, gear, cable t.v., etc. etc. to watch a group of idiots throw a ball around.
-TG