Borderdawg wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Who cares?
Humans did not evolve in North America, so every single human in in Canada, the U.S.A., or Mexico, is an immigrant or the descendant of immigrants.
People who rant about immigrants are basically saying, "I'm glad that it was easy to immigrate here when I/my father/my grandfather/my great-grandfather/etc. came over here, but I sure as hell don't want to extend the same courtesy to anyone else!"
Fucking hypocrites. You came to the Land of Opportunity, now don't stand in the way of other people that want to do the same.
????? Dude, I'm not saying end all immigration forever, I'm saying the freaking system is broken, let's fix it as quickly as possible. Perhaps you just skimmed the post, saw it was a Texas thing, and instantly assumed it was an anti-immigration post? Typical yankee logic. Try reading it again, very slowly. Maybe even sound out the words so you don't get confused. If you have too much trouble pm me, I'll try to explain the big words for you in very simple terms.

Actually, putting in some paragraph breaks in logical places would help far more than sounding out the big words. The basic stuff your teachers tried to teach you in Grade Four is very valuable -- every paragraph has an introductory sentence and a concluding sentence, and one to five sentences in between, and then a space before the next paragraph. Clarity in communication is a pretty important thing.
That would be a start, anyway. Or maybe you could present your "solutions" as a bulleted list, if you don't like paragraphs. I mean, the software does carry
- built-in
- support
- for
- bulleted
- lists
- with
- good
- reason
, so that you don't have to look like James Joyce having a bad hair day.
So, yeah, I did just skim the first half of your post, and completely gave up before the second half. But now that you've made an issue of it, I went back and did you the courtesy of reading the whole thing. Guess what? Not much changed. You're still mostly an immigrant hater. Yes, you're willing to legalize the ones that have shown a history of responsibility, and I agree, that's a positive step. But you want to immediately send back any others, without waiting to find out if they'll be responsible or not. That basically means you're still against immigrants, just willing to let bygones be bygones with those who have been here long enough.
I'm sure when your grandpa or great-grandpa came over from Pomerania or Scotland or Sicily or the Ukraine or wherever you're originally from, nobody demanded that he demonstrate twenty years of responsible living or they'd send him back. They just accepted him as-is and let him make his own way.
You can be sure that 90% of the people don't want to be criminals or live on welfare. 90% of them want to work for a living and make their way in life through honest and honourable means, but they're stuck in places where that is impossible, so they make their way to places where maybe they will have a chance. Yes, there's a major law-and-order problem along the way, and as you point out the human trade is controlled by the drug cartels. Whose fault is that? When Prohibition was repealed, the main motivation was to restore law and order. Prohibition created the gang warfare of the late 20s and early 30s, and people were sick of it. The War on Immigration, like the War on Drugs, is what drives these people to beg the cartels for help. When you make normal activities a crime, you make normal people into criminals.
You have contradictory positions on the latter. You want to legalize pot but have capital punishment for meth. Either legalization is a good idea or it isn't. Either capital punishment is a good idea or it isn't. I won't argue about which, since it's somewhat irrelevant to this whole discussion, and I don't want to be up all day typing. The only thing is that the two positions are contradictory. A recreational drug is a recreational drug. If legalizing pot is a good idea, then legalizing meth is a good idea. If having capital punishment for meth is a good idea, then having capital punishment for pot is a good idea too, and capital punishment for drinking Budweiser is a good idea too.
I could criticize other details in your post, but I'm not here about the details. Your basic philosophy, plus or minus a couple tweaks, is against immigration, and that is just plain wrong. The immigrant of today or tomorrow is no different than my father or your grandfather. He's just a scared and desperate soul that wants a chance to make a life for himself. Leave him alone.