[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Never attacked each other's important bonuses the entire game and attack other players together. Very suspicious behaviour with no interaction in game chat whatsoever.
they have played one game together on this site. one joined in '07, the other in '09. so, they picked this one game to decide and collude? interesting.-Jésus noir
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
- The two strongest are working over the weakest, It does not have to be mentioned in chat if it's a mutual obv., Blue will be next, It's the process of elimination, and these two are not about to battle and give the rest of you a chance to come back.
I personally think they both players are hesitating to make a move, especcially against each other. The both know that any move they make can result in counter moves.
I think that is the case here, if you have no further evidence?
Perhaps they truly were hesitating to attack each other. It is the only game they played together after all. But the game was totally given away by the second strongest player to the strongest player. I don't have further evidence.
Heraklius wrote:Perhaps they truly were hesitating to attack each other. It is the only game they played together after all. But the game was totally given away by the second strongest player to the strongest player. I don't have further evidence.
just because you don't agree with how someone plays, they are not "giving" a game away. if everyone played how you wanted or thought they were, you would be undefeated... ever think of that? *black jesus eyes rolling right out of my black jesus skull*... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
