Moderator: Community Team

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... metry.htmlWhen considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.
I always offer cake, friend.riskllama wrote:will u be serving cake in this thread, caff?
If you want to count that, it's currently 1-5.Symmetry wrote:http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... metry.htmlWhen considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.
BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.

In my favour though, right? I do have the scientists on my side. You've got riskllama.iAmCaffeine wrote:I always offer cake, friend.riskllama wrote:will u be serving cake in this thread, caff?
If you want to count that, it's currently 1-5.Symmetry wrote:http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... metry.htmlWhen considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.
BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.
However, perfect symmetry is not attractive.Symmetry wrote:http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... metry.htmlWhen considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.
BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.
Good thing I'm not perfectWingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:However, perfect symmetry is not attractive.Symmetry wrote:http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... metry.htmlWhen considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.
BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.
Own goal?
No, 6-2 against you. I guess riskllama only counts as .5 so it's 5.5 vs 2.Symmetry wrote:In my favour though, right? I do have the scientists on my side. You've got riskllama.iAmCaffeine wrote:I always offer cake, friend.riskllama wrote:will u be serving cake in this thread, caff?
If you want to count that, it's currently 1-5.Symmetry wrote:http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... metry.htmlWhen considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.
BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.
It is?WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:When is this getting moved to general discussion?

You make a good point!Symmetry wrote:In my favour though, right? I do have the scientists on my side. You've got riskllama.iAmCaffeine wrote:I always offer cake, friend.riskllama wrote:will u be serving cake in this thread, caff?
If you want to count that, it's currently 1-5.Symmetry wrote:http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... metry.htmlWhen considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.
BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.
This ain't my first rodeo.BrutalBob wrote:You make a good point!Symmetry wrote:In my favour though, right? I do have the scientists on my side. You've got riskllama.iAmCaffeine wrote:I always offer cake, friend.riskllama wrote:will u be serving cake in this thread, caff?
If you want to count that, it's currently 1-5.Symmetry wrote:http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... metry.htmlWhen considering a mate, people's assessment of physical beauty is mostly about symmetry, scientists say.
BOOM- SCORE ONE FOR TEAM SYM.
I have literally no idea what you're talking about, but I support your right to say it, maybe.elbitjusticiero wrote:Symmetry is a good thing. For example, if you have a notorious asshole on one side, you should have an equivalent on the other. When a notorious asshole leaves, a void is created, and others step up to fill it.
I prefer my assholes unsweetened.
I don't think I can double down on the voting, but caff's team does seem to have stalled.elbitjusticiero wrote:I voted for you, actually.
- Everyone outspoken is a troll, If your able to surf around looking to respond to subjects that interest you, then your guilty of being a troll.riskllama wrote:what about the trolling instinct, mags? genetics or environment?
Being outspoken is not the same thing as trolling, nor is liking to engage in debates.MagnusGreeol wrote:- Everyone outspoken is a troll, If your able to surf around looking to respond to subjects that interest you, then your guilty of being a troll.riskllama wrote:what about the trolling instinct, mags? genetics or environment?
- I would say it's genetics, there are people who aren't afraid to post, and people who are shy and like to read but not post, then those who could give a rat's azz about anything but the wars in front of them. I'm an outspoken troll ")
-\M∆GS/-
Oxford dictionaries wrote:To troll= Make a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them.