

Well, pretty much everybody is a "supporter of global warming" (unless that means Republicans creating policies to promote global warming) so, this basically means that people like waterfront property?tzor wrote:So riddle me this. With the exception of one fringe candidate, almost all the major supporters of global warming are locating to the shoreline. CNN is moving to Hudson Yards. Obama is moving to Martha's Vineyards. Are they insane or do they totally don't believe the bullshit they are selling people?
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
By "supporter of global warming" I usually mean companies like Exxon that continue pushing fossil fuel dependence.tzor wrote:So riddle me this. With the exception of one fringe candidate, almost all the major supporters of global warming are locating to the shoreline. CNN is moving to Hudson Yards. Obama is moving to Martha's Vineyards. Are they insane or do they totally don't believe the bullshit they are selling people?
But only a few have seaplanes.riskllama wrote:most rich people have personal aircraft, tzor...![]()

BY supporter of global warming, I mean those people who actively support the concept of the problem of global warming.Dukasaur wrote:By "supporter of global warming" I usually mean companies like Exxon that continue pushing fossil fuel dependence.

Well first of all, remember that "New York City" is an association of five distinct Burroughs. Each one has to be considered separately.NomadPatriot wrote:I like the Sea Wall they are building around New York City to Save it from rising Ocean Levels...

it's a hard number to actually find but it seems the lowest point in Manhattan is only 8 feet above sea level. not sure where thst is though..tzor wrote:Well first of all, remember that "New York City" is an association of five distinct Burroughs. Each one has to be considered separately.NomadPatriot wrote:I like the Sea Wall they are building around New York City to Save it from rising Ocean Levels...
Let's consider Manhattan (I just pulled a topographic map for reference). Central Park is 50' above sea level and the great hill is over 100'. The upper parts of Manhattan is well over 50' throughout and has places over 200'
People get the impression that 10' of sea rise is going to sink the whole island; it's not true.
I understand what you meant. I posit that you're using the language incorrectly.tzor wrote:BY supporter of global warming, I mean those people who actively support the concept of the problem of global warming.Dukasaur wrote:By "supporter of global warming" I usually mean companies like Exxon that continue pushing fossil fuel dependence.
I would generally put Exxon as a "causer" of global warming.
Uhh... you remember a 3.4 meter rise from Hurricane Sandy, right? And that was a temporary surge, which will happen more and more as ocean levels rise. Nobody says that all of NYC will be under water, it'll just be a catastrophe.tzor wrote:Well first of all, remember that "New York City" is an association of five distinct Burroughs. Each one has to be considered separately.NomadPatriot wrote:I like the Sea Wall they are building around New York City to Save it from rising Ocean Levels...
Let's consider Manhattan (I just pulled a topographic map for reference). Central Park is 50' above sea level and the great hill is over 100'. The upper parts of Manhattan is well over 50' throughout and has places over 200'
People get the impression that 10' of sea rise is going to sink the whole island; it's not true.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.