@wicked

NESconqueror · Post by **NESconqueror** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:29 pm

Thank you for locking that chris7he thread... Gives me less of a headache to bother with it. You have my undying gratitude.

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:30 pm

She will probly lock this thread also

NESconqueror · Post by **NESconqueror** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:30 pm

dustn64 wrote:She will probly lock this thread also

what for? It has no spam or flaming whatsoever. I enjoy the mods here.

soundout9 · Post by **soundout9** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:34 pm

suck-up

I love you WICKED!!!

edwinissweet · Post by **edwinissweet** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:40 pm

that is so much freaking crap (note no curse words

) that kid has been spaming the place up with his pedo links of that so-called-girl for like 3 days now and no1 has said poo about it.

Wicked i bet you a weeks worth of advertisement through your sig for the under 18 clan if you look up his posts and find no less than 15 post without the word lauren in it.. i bet you half of them even have the link to it.
this is retarded.

*sticks it to the man* (woman in wickeds case)

im going to start spaming up the place like crazy with my own links if nothing is done about chris.. even if i get banned from the public forums

soundout9 · Post by **soundout9** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:43 pm

edwinissweet wrote:that is so much freaking crap (note no curse words ) that kid has been spaming the place up with his pedo links of that so-called-girl for like 3 days now and no1 has said poo about it.

Wicked i bet you a weeks worth of advertisement through your sig for the under 18 clan if you look up his posts and find no less than 15 post without the word lauren in it.. i bet you half of them even have the link to it.
this is retarded.

*sticks it to the man* (woman in wickeds case)

im going to start spaming up the place like crazy with my own links if nothing is done about chris.. even if i get banned from the public forums

Are you retarded....i NEVER advertised that ugly ass chick!

You mean Chris7He

edwinissweet · Post by **edwinissweet** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:43 pm

soundout9 wrote:
edwinissweet wrote:that is so much freaking crap (note no curse words ) that kid has been spaming the place up with his pedo links of that so-called-girl for like 3 days now and no1 has said poo about it.

Wicked i bet you a weeks worth of advertisement through your sig for the under 18 clan if you look up his posts and find no less than 15 post without the word lauren in it.. i bet you half of them even have the link to it.
this is retarded.

*sticks it to the man* (woman in wickeds case)

im going to start spaming up the place like crazy with my own links if nothing is done about chris.. even if i get banned from the public forums
Are your retarded....i NEVER advertised that ugly ass chick!

huh? wat do u mean?

soundout9 · Post by **soundout9** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:45 pm

edwinissweet wrote:
soundout9 wrote:
edwinissweet wrote:that is so much freaking crap (note no curse words ) that kid has been spaming the place up with his pedo links of that so-called-girl for like 3 days now and no1 has said poo about it.

Wicked i bet you a weeks worth of advertisement through your sig for the under 18 clan if you look up his posts and find no less than 15 post without the word lauren in it.. i bet you half of them even have the link to it.
this is retarded.

*sticks it to the man* (woman in wickeds case)

im going to start spaming up the place like crazy with my own links if nothing is done about chris.. even if i get banned from the public forums
Are your retarded....i NEVER advertised that ugly ass chick!

huh? wat do u mean?

Who are you talking about?

Strife · Post by **Strife** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:47 pm

LOCK-ER-DOWN!

edwinissweet · Post by **edwinissweet** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:47 pm

im complainig about chris7he.. but now im complaining to wicked for locking the official compliant thread....

i bet her a weeks worth of advertisement in her sig if im right wen i say that that kid has posted atleast 15 posts with laurels name in it...

soundout9 · Post by **soundout9** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:50 pm

edwinissweet wrote:im complainig about chris7he.. but now im complaining to wicked for locking the official compliant thread....

i bet her a weeks worth of advertisement in her sig if im right wen i say that that kid has posted atleast 15 posts with laurels name in it...

O i thought you were talking about me saying i posted the links

my bad

edwinissweet · Post by **edwinissweet** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:56 pm

lol no... anyway... yea.

so wicked? do we have a bet?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:57 pm

edwinissweet wrote:im complainig about chris7he.. but now im complaining to wicked for locking the official compliant thread....

i bet her a weeks worth of advertisement in her sig if im right wen i say that that kid has posted atleast 15 posts with laurels name in it...

You were asking people to spam.

And no one cares if anyone posts about laurel or whoever.

edwinissweet · Post by **edwinissweet** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:01 pm

wicked wrote:
edwinissweet wrote:im complainig about chris7he.. but now im complaining to wicked for locking the official compliant thread....

i bet her a weeks worth of advertisement in her sig if im right wen i say that that kid has posted atleast 15 posts with laurels name in it...
You were asking people to spam.

And no one cares if anyone posts about laurel or whoever.

yea we do. im going to start another thread. dont lock it this time. it will be dead serious. i can get 50 spamfree posts (signatures) in 24 hours. if i get them you will ban him if he brings her up again. cool?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:38 am

edwinissweet · Post by **edwinissweet** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:50 am

wicked wrote:No.

grrr

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:52 am

If you don't like his posts, don't read them. Simple as that.

edwinissweet · Post by **edwinissweet** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:58 am

wicked wrote:If you don't like his posts, don't read them. Simple as that.

you banned tabasco for spaming up the place.. and thats exactly wat he is doing. he finds a way to relater that girl to every single damn thread. i dont want him banned i just dont to see that bitches face and name every forum i go to

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:03 am

edwinissweet wrote:
wicked wrote:If you don't like his posts, don't read them. Simple as that.

you banned tabasco for spaming up the place.. and thats exactly wat he is doing. he finds a way to relater that girl to every single damn thread. i dont want him banned i just dont to see that bitches face and name every forum i go to

Though you could have put it more eloquently... I agree.

edwinissweet · Post by **edwinissweet** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:04 am

waterver just lock it. screw it.

i still think is crap

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:04 am

If he's creative enough to keep it on topic and not flaming, then more power to him.

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:26 am

wicked wrote:If you don't like his posts, don't read them. Simple as that.

So with that ideology I could post porn and if people don't like them they can just not look at them?

edwinissweet · Post by **edwinissweet** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:27 am

Iliad wrote:
wicked wrote:If you don't like his posts, don't read them. Simple as that.
So with that ideology I could post porn and if people don't like them they can just not look at them?

do it do it do it

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:31 am

edwinissweet wrote:
Iliad wrote:
wicked wrote:If you don't like his posts, don't read them. Simple as that.
So with that ideology I could post porn and if people don't like them they can just not look at them?

do it do it do it

I'm not going to do it but there is a double standard here. If a person is spamming we are told not to read it if we don't like it but if somoene pots porn they get banned

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:52 am

Iliad wrote:
edwinissweet wrote:
Iliad wrote:
wicked wrote:If you don't like his posts, don't read them. Simple as that.
So with that ideology I could post porn and if people don't like them they can just not look at them?

do it do it do it
I'm not going to do it but there is a double standard here. If a person is spamming we are told not to read it if we don't like it but if somoene pots porn they get banned

because if a parent sees a kid reading porn they will get mad, and some people think kids should be looking at that stuff. But if they see spam, they won't mind much.

Not that I believe in this, but it could be the reasoning.