Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
That's kinda the idea behind storing power...GabonX wrote:Thats good but I still see rainy days as being a big problem. Good luck utilizing technology like this in places like London. Also, they're going to need to find a better catalyst than platinum.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
What, producing platinum? I must have missed the part about how they are gonna turn sunlight into the world's most valued metal.Neoteny wrote:That's kinda the idea behind storing power...GabonX wrote:Thats good but I still see rainy days as being a big problem. Good luck utilizing technology like this in places like London. Also, they're going to need to find a better catalyst than platinum.
OH yeah? How about this Mr. Smarty,GabonX wrote:What, producing platinum? I must have missed the part about how they are gonna turn sunlight into the world's most valued metal.Neoteny wrote:That's kinda the idea behind storing power...GabonX wrote:Thats good but I still see rainy days as being a big problem. Good luck utilizing technology like this in places like London. Also, they're going to need to find a better catalyst than platinum.
Seriously though, even if they perfect this technology I can see it having severe limitations. Anywhere where there is prolonged time with minimal sunlight will have a problem with this unless they can store massive amounts of energy..
..What I don't understand is why they don't just hook the solar panels up to an alternator, use the energy to spin a fan, and store the energy that way. It may not be the most efficient way to store solar energy that is possible but it would definitely work and we could start building solar alternators now instead of possibly being able to store solar energy ten years into the future..
..and once again I'm smarter than everyone.
Rainy days. That's the idea behind storing the power.GabonX wrote:What, producing platinum? I must have missed the part about how they are gonna turn sunlight into the world's most valued metal.Neoteny wrote:That's kinda the idea behind storing power...GabonX wrote:Thats good but I still see rainy days as being a big problem. Good luck utilizing technology like this in places like London. Also, they're going to need to find a better catalyst than platinum.
Seriously though, even if they perfect this technology I can see it having severe limitations. Anywhere where there is prolonged time with minimal sunlight will have a problem with this unless they can store massive amounts of energy..
..What I don't understand is why they don't just hook the solar panels up to an alternator, use the energy to spin a fan, and store the energy that way. It may not be the most efficient way to store solar energy that is possible but it would definitely work and we could start building solar alternators now instead of possibly being able to store solar energy ten years into the future..
..and once again I'm smarter than everyone.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
You spelled sentence wrong.Juan_Bottom wrote:
OH yeah? How about this Mr. Smarty,
The next sentence will be true.
The last sentance was false.
*GABONX's head explodes*
OK. First off the technology they are talking about doesn't exist currently, so it is only speculation as of yet. Second, there are places on this planet where it rains for months at a time and also where there is no sunlight for weeks or months. It would require massive storage of energy to enable the people who live in these places to utilize solar technology. I suggest you research scandinavian winters and "wet seasons" just about anywhere instead of flaming me about things that I'm right about.Neoteny wrote:
Rainy days, fucktard. That's the idea behind storing the power. You're barely smarter than a gerbil.
Just to clarify, are you arguing that George Bush isn't a horrible president? Because I really haven't seen anything positive come out of his administration.GabonX wrote:Sorry for being such a "fucktard," it's just that I think it's better to be skeptical of technologies that don't yet exist and I don't subscribe to the "Bush is worse than Hitler cause John Stewart told me so!!!111" philosophy.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
I'm thinking if you take the oxygen out it will be hard to contain hydrogen as it wil normally be waste. Just my assumptionjonesthecurl wrote:Maybe I'm going senile, but I don't understand why you need one catalyst to get oxygen from water, and a different one to get hydrogen.
Surely when you take the oxygen out of the water you are left with hydrogen and vice versa?
I mean, unless I missed some basic science, water molecules are made from hydrogen and oxygen...and nothing else.
This does seem like it would be true. I am not certain about this but I think for whatever reason certain catalysis will only separate hydrogen or oxygen as a gas and will leave the leftovers (either H+ or OH-) in solution. For example I'm pretty sure you get hydrogen gas when you react an alkaline metal with water, but not oxygen gas.jonesthecurl wrote:Surely either catlyst will separate the water into two gases?