Moderator: Tournament Directors
new thread for new tournament, as its unlikelly that the first will finish in under a week, so we dont have the mods moving the threads all over the place back and forthbrandoncfi wrote:Sounds cool Ill help...Would there be only 1 sign up thread or would you have a new thread every week
monthly would be no different then what i currently do for tournaments though... lol, i normally create a new tournament every week on average if not moremax is gr8 wrote:I think a monthly schedule would be a better idea.
Now, while i like what you/prime are saying in this, its just not what i mean, basically what you guys are talking about is a general timeline for organizers to post the tournaments, while what im suggesting is a concistant almost completely standardized tournament to come out on a schedual, while still allowing the organizers to make whatever tournaments they wish on the side... Basically wnat i want to make is a type of tournament the players can count on to me online when they expect it and can join on a schedual, not players looking for a certain organizer.amazzony wrote:I said I'll drop by when I have more time and it seems that I have now...
I'll start from the back (no offense, Nate!) and say that I like Optimus' idea (no, he didn't get me hooked by using me as an example). Sometimes several experienced organisers post at the same time and then there can be weeks when nobody posts anything. One good aspect would be what Optimus mentioned. Another thing is that if there's always a tournament by experienced organiser looking for players then new players who lurk around in tournament forums would have a chance to join a good tournament. Now, please, don't get me wrong, I don't think that only experienced organisers can run good tournaments but often it happens that those who have ran several know how to set everything up and their posts might be more attractive and inviting. Plus I think if the list suggested by Optimus would be advertised well enough then notification lists could be forgotten and that would give better chance to new players find good tournaments.
I'm not sure if the above paragraph makes any sense![]()
now this is easilly done, i dont mind doing this like i said what i have above is an example, nothing more, we can easilly stagger them, for example you live across the ocean so say we could do like thisamazzony wrote: Now, Nate, if I got your idea correctly then I don't like it. I like it overall but one thing makes me not like - that you want to use the same timezone. I think that the time zone should be different in each tournament. For example, I'm not ready to stay up until 3 o'clock to join a tournament but the time I wake up a small tournament might be full. So, I think that the timezones should be different each time... lets say that they shift 3 hours with every tournament... that way everybody has a chance to join one of the tournaments and in that case I like your idea (though I think it needs more thinking through, some evolving and some... twist maybe?).
I'm not sure if this makes any sense eitherBut at least I dropped it and gave you my 2 cents, in this case 2 paragraphs
i was attempting something similar to this a couple weeks ago, but what with all the travel/holidays at this time of year i desided to put it off until maybe around the feb. month hopefully more people will be able to get on regularlyDJ Teflon wrote:I was thinking something like his but more of a Speed Tournament - players play regularly on a certain day, at a certain time.
Say 6-player games - players have a 'window' to join (e.g. 7.45pm to 8.15pm), and if they dont turn-up in time then those who have joined then drop the 6-player game for a 5-player game (or 4, or 3) that's already set-up as a backup.
There could be groups playing in mini-leagues in different time zones. Maybe they could meet at a mutual time for a few games too.