1 - porn is not allowed on youtube.
2 - If I link to a site that has a button on its bottom corner that lead to a porn site, would that link be deleted too because it could lead to porn?
3- Mods, sense of humour, proper judgment -please find some.
4 - There are topic on this site of women with scantily clad clothes barely on., but that's ok?
5 - Youtube, ever browsed it?
6 - Conquer club is about having fun, for everybody, not just those with power that get to wield(abuse) it whenever they wish.
I probably should go on, but at the end of the day, when you don't have any power, and reason an rationality have no effect, what can you do?
This video or group may contain content that is inappropriate for some users, as flagged by YouTube's user community.
To view this video or group, please verify you are 18 or older by signing in or signing up.
That pretty clearly sets off a curiosity as to why the video is not allowed to be seen by minors. I do not have a youtube account, so I asked Twill to check it for me. He said that the video itself was clean but that there were links to others that were not allowed on this site. I then took the appropriate actions based on our Community Guidelines.
If something says you have to be 18 or older to view it, I would highly recommend not posting it on this site. Or be 110% sure that everything on that page is clean.
Night Strike wrote:When I clicked on the link, this text showed up:
This video or group may contain content that is inappropriate for some users, as flagged by YouTube's user community.
To view this video or group, please verify you are 18 or older by signing in or signing up.
That pretty clearly sets off a curiosity as to why the video is not allowed to be seen by minors. I do not have a youtube account, so I asked Twill to check it for me. He said that the video itself was clean but that there were links to others that were not allowed on this site. I then took the appropriate actions based on our Community Guidelines.
If something says you have to be 18 or older to view it, I would highly recommend not posting it on this site. Or be 110% sure that everything on that page is clean.
Technically, the link was to an age verification form, a page which has absolutely nothing pornographic on it. It would be up to the users over 18 to decide whether or not watching anything that requires such measures is appropriate at the time, and anybody under 18 should not be viewing it at all.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Night Strike wrote: When I clicked on the link, this text showed up:
This video or group may contain content that is inappropriate for some users, as flagged by YouTube's user community.
To view this video or group, please verify you are 18 or older by signing in or signing up.
That pretty clearly sets off a curiosity as to why the video is not allowed to be seen by minors.
Anybody with a youtube account can flag any video, no matter the content. In fact when you title a video like this you want it flagged, so idiots will really believe they will be on to something.
Night Strike wrote:
I do not have a youtube account, so I asked Twill to check it for me. He said that the video itself was clean but that there were links to others that were not allowed on this site. I then took the appropriate actions based on our Community Guidelines.
If something says you have to be 18 or older to view it, I would highly recommend not posting it on this site. Or be 110% sure that everything on that page is clean.
MrBenn wrote:The Community Guidelines state that
Nudity and sexual material are not allowed.
... obviously this includes, but is not limited to pornographic material.
In other words twill looked at the names of the links on the page, and thought ohmygodthesexywecan'tcorruptourmembersbyallowingthemtoseethese...
Not considering for a second that all those videos are titled as the original was, to get idiots to click on them thinking their might be some shecks there..
MrBenn wrote:The Community Guidelines state that
Nudity and sexual material are not allowed.
... obviously this includes, but is not limited to pornographic material.
Yeah, that sounds pretty like the policy youtube has...
hecter wrote:Technically, the link was to an age verification form, a page which has absolutely nothing pornographic on it. It would be up to the users over 18 to decide whether or not watching anything that requires such measures is appropriate at the time, and anybody under 18 should not be viewing it at all.
Precisely. The link takes you to a site that asks for age verification, it doesn't take you directly to the videos.
And if a 16 year old did click on the verification button, what's the worst that could happen? Oh no! A 16 year old has learned how to do a proper breast examination...
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
hecter wrote:Technically, the link was to an age verification form, a page which has absolutely nothing pornographic on it. It would be up to the users over 18 to decide whether or not watching anything that requires such measures is appropriate at the time, and anybody under 18 should not be viewing it at all.
Precisely. The link takes you to a site that asks for age verification, it doesn't take you directly to the videos.
And if a 16 year old did click on the verification button, what's the worst that could happen? Oh no! A 16 year old has learned how to do a proper breast examination...
Without nipples, because Youtube would probably have removed that. Or said 16 year old might be able to listen to music, the lyrics of which contain uncensored expletives. The horror!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
No response from a mod? when your initial claim for locking the thread was false. Do I have to contact Youtube Admin to have them expain to you that porn/nudity etc is not permitted on their site?
Or do you guys(the mods/admin) just bury your heads in the sand when you've made a mistake and are too arrogant to admit your mistake, apologise, and unlock the other topic?
From the numerous bad decisions I've witnessed here recently, I think I won't hold my breath.
Well, I never looked at the original, because of the age-related warning - I never enable anything like that in case the kids stumble across it (yes, I may have the only porn-free computer in the Northern hemisphere!).
But to lock something acceptable because it sits near something potentially unacceptable would surely mean no links to Yewtoob at all.
jonesthecurl wrote:...or wiki- or any- pedia - they will have medical pics of naughty bits in, no?
Yes, there was a penis incident...
jonesthecurl wrote:...or links to any art museums, or science museums, or libraries...
And a loong time ago hecter had to change his/her/its avatar because it depicted a painting of a nude woman. Can you imagine? A several hundred year old painting of a nude woman with nipples and naughty bits and everything as an avatar! Shrunk down to 100*100 pixels. The poor artist must be turning in his grave at having his work treated like that...
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
The fact the the NSFW-Show-Blitzaholic-lots-of-pics-of-naked-women-covering-breasts-with-their-arms-thread has gone on for so long with noone caring but a youtube link was deleted because of innappropriately titled links shows a massive hypocrisy.
I think some those photos are quite pornographic at times, they're depicting women in a totally sexualized way. I don't complain because I don't give a shit and I'm not a prude, but i don't see the fucking difference
I must say, it is pretty much complete bullshit that I got banned over it.
It was an honest mistake, and I had no idea I would be PUNISHED for something I had no control over. But fine, lesson learned. Don't post anything that might include links to other things! Of course, it wouldn't even be an issue if we were allowed to embed videos.
I honestly wish Night Strike could be arbitrarily banned for 24 hours, or better yet, a few days. Let him see what heavy handed judgments feel like, both as a condemnation of a person's character, and as a completely heavy handed method for dealing with things.
I even PMed a mod when I first posted that thing, saying to be sure to check the link before overreacting. The mods know I am responsive and cooperative. They didn't have to take punitive measures.
This is why people don't bother renewing. What's the point? Even an obviously harmless joke has to become a big federal issue, instead of quietly taking it down and letting it fade into the ether of forum memory. Nope, instead it has to become a big deal.
Seriously, it feels like they were LOOKING for a reason to act punitively in this case because of the completely ancillary nature of the objectionable content.
Plus, this site is so arbitrary in its rules enforcement. I could swallow these harsh pills if they would just ENFORCE THE RULES FOR EVERYONE, not just their little clique of insiders.
Plus, when you reach out to these megalomaniacs, they don't even RESPOND. You try to open a private dialogue with the punitive mods, what do you get? Silence.
Fine, I'll keep my money. That's no kind of customer service. You wanna give me the finger, fine.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Night Strike wrote:When I clicked on the link, this text showed up:
This video or group may contain content that is inappropriate for some users, as flagged by YouTube's user community.
To view this video or group, please verify you are 18 or older by signing in or signing up.
That pretty clearly sets off a curiosity as to why the video is not allowed to be seen by minors. I do not have a youtube account
Then you shouldn't have mod powers. If you can't access one of the biggest linked sites in CC, why are you a mod?
You wouldn't get a driving licence if you are blind.
This picture is deeply offensive and sexual in nature, if any mod sees this, please ban backglass for no less than 28.3 hours.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Be-Jeebus. What do you expect when you post a link claiming its some chick squirting? My 11 year old saw that advertisement and asked me about it. Fooking brilliant Pimpasaurusrex. Too bad yer pissed but pull your head out.
And the thread of the chicks in bikinis and other nominal clothing has been modded several times.
I dont see this as such a nazi state; I see it as a bunch of fooking whiners. Play war....whine about something real like the craphouse dice....lol.
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."
KoolBak wrote:Be-Jeebus. What do you expect when you post a link claiming its some chick squirting? My 11 year old saw that advertisement and asked me about it. Fooking brilliant Pimpasaurusrex.
Does your 11 year old ask what "Fooking" means? Just curious.
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
