Aki4Real wrote:
Accused:
petesilv
Lord Cheto
The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis or Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Game number(s):
Game 4378629
Comments:
Look at the game and their moves.. obvious teamplay or multi
The time between them taking their turns also is somewhat peculiar.
Game is still in progress..so you can see what they did until now..and I saw their history almost every game they play together
I think its pretty safe to say that
petesilv,
Lord Cheto, &
Aldevaran are all friends that play together.
petesilv
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:38 pm
Country: USA
16 games played/involved in (10 of them with at least 1 of the others)
Lord Cheto
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:21 pm
Country: USA
22 games played/involved in (8 of them with petesilv in it)
Aldevaran
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:12 pm
Country: USA
10 games played/involved in (9 of them with petesilv in it)
- 3 player games with all 3 in it
3 player game with just petesilv & Aldevaran
4 player game with all 3
3 player game with just petesilv & Lord Cheto
Game 4378629 Log wrote:
2009-03-02 18:34:25 - petesilv reinforced Media with 4 troops from Parthynia
Game 4347479 Log wrote:
2009-03-02 18:34:23 - Lord Cheto deployed 9 troops on Greenland
This discredits the notion of
petesilv &
Lord Cheto being multiple accounts seeing as the timing between turns in the 2 separate games mentioned.
Game 4378629 Log wrote:
2009-03-02 18:39:36 - Lord Cheto assaulted Lydia from Caria and conquered it from Aki4Real
Game 4347479 Log wrote:
2009-03-02 18:39:39 - Aldevaran receives 6 troops for holding Europe
This discredits the notion of
Lord Cheto &
Aldevaran being multiple accounts seeing as the timing between turns in the 2 separate games mentioned.
Game 4347479 Log wrote:2009-02-26 16:16:06 - Aldevaran receives 11 troops for 33 regions
Game 4340528 Log wrote:2009-02-26 16:16:15 - petesilv reinforced Broomstick Base with 2 troops from Sheelbe Buggery
This discredits the notion of
Aldevaran &
petesilv being multiple accounts seeing as the timing between turns in the 2 separate games mentioned.
With the amount of games that they play together as opposed to other people I think one can safely assume that maybe you joined the game before their other counterpart could, and may or may not have got a raw deal out of the situation.
Secret alliances are hard to prove, and most likely at the most you will get from this claim is that they will be
NOTED.
I would recommend for you to move on and rate them accordingly.
And I would recommend to the 3 that were/are in question to
- to make sure their speaking English or in a language that all opponents understand in chat
- at least one upgrade to Premium status so they can set these games to private and not have this problem again
However all I do is try to provide insight, maybe I got it wrong. The hunters might be able to piece together data to show an unsaid alliance between two or three of these players when there involved in games that have other users in them.
Best of Luck
King Sam
