[OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" Day 2

[Ragian]

I don't know what more you want. I can't get you a guilty verdict. I got this so far on Son!c:
- D1: Voted EW Devon without reason and then scolded EW for asking about the vote.
- D1: When I did the same, he didn't acknowledge the vote at all.
- D1: When I mentioned him not acknowledging the vote, he didn't react.
- N1: Visited halrob.
- D2: Has, according to EW, claimed to be town doc.
- D2: Refuses to engage in clearing whether or not he did in fact claim town doc/protective role.

EBWOP

At no point have I generalised that you vote without reason.

[SoN!c]

i didn't got your vote or stab D1 at me at all and its one of the things that later sticked to me as one of many "huh i didnt say thaties".. this happened when the patern became visible but "Ragian is misreading it or his memory is messy" was my D1 town (just town paranoid) feel on you.

So D1 i must have fast read it, either not thinking much of it or i scrolled over completely thinking its a misread or thinking this is not were the focus must be at that time.

I still don't know your question or what it was but if you rephrase now always happy to answer.

Also to lazy to read back because i dont care but there were a lot of "i didnt say thaties", hence the "old man and memory remarks" i made (which i shouldnt have but i was trying to get a angry reaction emotion out of you) and then later the "elfendust dorc poops" remarks when the pattern got too stinky for me to believe it to be town. Like now im pretty sure i never voted anybody without a stated reason (if not following somebody like loose to add pressure for good reasons). Its just not my style to do so.

[SoN!c]

I don't know what more you want. I can't get you a guilty verdict. I got this so far on Son!c:
- D1: Voted EW Devon without reason and then scolded EW for asking about the vote.
- D1: When I did the same, he didn't acknowledge the vote at all.
- D1: When I mentioned him not acknowledging the vote, he didn't react.
- N1: Visited halrob.
- D2: Has, according to EW, claimed to be town doc.
- D2: Refuses to engage in clearing whether or not he did in fact claim town doc/protective role.

EBWOP

At no point have I generalised that you vote without reason.

Didnt see the FP

[chanakam2020]

Hm, This is becoming very interesting and also very complex.
Trying to understand the long confrontation of EW, Sonic, Ragian & (Loose Cannon ?) My head is spinning like a spinnign top in a roller coaster

D2 is flying and it seems we are nowhere near to agree for one thing or other.
On D-1 we found virtually nothing
(We got COP claim form halrob. But at D-2 did not have chance to verify it because of stewpid higher authority)
If we finish the D-2 also without clear plan and agreement to find some useful info I think we will be in very bad shape when another 2 die at night.
.
Earlier on this game some wise man said "lynching is the towns only weapon"
(cannot remember who said it and lazy and not feeling well and not in mood to dig down deep in thread to find it)
.
If we lynch some one today there is 4/11 = 0.36 chance we will bust a Bad Boy
Going to N2 with no lynch D-2 = We had 0.00% chance of busting a Bad Boy on D-2 and we go to night without any new solid info.
.
Now at the moment in D-2 we have 4 Bad boys and 7 Good Boys.
If we luckey to lynch a correct target today, then at the begining of D-3 after 2 night deaths there will be 3 Bad Boys vs 5 Good Boys & 5 votes enough to lynch.
If we mislynch a Good Boya today then at the begining of D-3 there will be 4 Bad Boys vs 4 Good Boys & 5 votes to lynch (Mission impossible !!!)

Am I doing correct math here ?
If I am correct we cannot risk to mislynch a Good Boy today.

I have to cast my vote very carefully and have to read and think more.
It seems there is no interest about getting Kingm to L-2 and getting his role claim.
So till I see some hope of light at the end of the tunnel

Unvote

[SoN!c]

I don't know what more you want. I can't get you a guilty verdict. I got this so far on Son!c:
- D1: Voted EW Devon without reason and then scolded EW for asking about the vote.
- D1: When I did the same, he didn't acknowledge the vote at all.
- D1: When I mentioned him not acknowledging the vote, he didn't react.
- N1: Visited halrob.
- D2: Has, according to EW, claimed to be town doc.
- D2: Refuses to engage in clearing whether or not he did in fact claim town doc/protective role.

EBWOP

At no point have I generalised that you vote without reason.

And you said it before in the "ground mud" post too

Ragians tin foil mafia its just too funny

[Loose Canon]

Trying to work out if I need to rethink here.

So rag sonic I think on rereading you have both virtually claimed town protective roles.

Correct?

If so I need to consider if both (say bodyguard and doc) are possible and if so how...?

And Sonic I think you have also confirmed you visited Halrob - correct?

[SoN!c]

Trying to work out if I need to rethink here.

So rag sonic I think on rereading you have both virtually claimed town protective roles.

Correct?

If so I need to consider if both (say bodyguard and doc) are possible and if so how...?

And Sonic I think you have also confirmed you visited Halrob - correct?

Yes 100%. I think my posts are very clear on that subject, at least for the comprehensive. Its Ragian who does not wanna answer anything on the matter.

[SoN!c]

As much as you hate it Sonic, I think there is an onus on you to make a full claim.

No its not. Its Ragian who needs to. He soft claimed a protective role. Me too, so one of us is lying. I already confirmed EW and im no bus driver.

And why if scum would i make this a Ragian OR SoNic thing? I could of easily pivoted to a silent player instead.

If this is not clear enough what is?

[Ragian]

Cool. If you also agree that one of us is lying, let's lynch one of us. I don't mind taking a bullet if I trade it for a scum hit.

[SoN!c]

Cool. If you also agree that one of us is lying, let's lynch one of us. I don't mind taking a bullet if I trade it for a scum hit.

Yes im pretty sure you would say that but im also 100% sure you don't wanna go first right

The entire play is D2 is crucial based.

I have no problem with town lynching me after lynching you first.

[Loose Canon]

Ew on the other hand claims to have correctly identified and so tracked a visitor sonic to halrob and it just so happens happened upon rag as the other player in his one of the two of you visited Halrob play.

And as a supposed town ew felt it worth outing his own pr and 50/50 outing another town pr to mafia.

There's a lot of coincidence and risking a lot for no guaranteed result in that.

A lot of a lot.

Fpd

[SoN!c]

Cool. If you also agree that one of us is lying, let's lynch one of us. I don't mind taking a bullet if I trade it for a scum hit.

If Rag is saying the truth here and wanna be lynched first i will believe him. Anybody can see this is bluff poker otherwise.

[Loose Canon]

And a mafia extreme with a mafia watcher of players visiting Halrob would see sonic and I think that would put sonic as the more likely of the 2 of you to be town.

Wouldn't it rag?

Wouldn't it sonic?

[SoN!c]

Rag, your poker bluff has been called.

Your pockets are empty by now but you can still gamble your tin foil hat.

Are you gonna go all in and agree to be lynched first? :Taking a bullet for the team first to trade in".

Or lets hear it - can't wait tbh what you will come up now