Moderator: Community Team
blacky365 wrote:Ragian wrote:Town commuter is a known town role, blacky, and it does something similar to what you're saying.
So if hes a town commuter, he is immune to night kills?
And then the only way he can be killed is a day lynch?
If thats the case then he will be the number one target for scum to lynch during the day... surely anyone who votes him would be scum... eek, do i unvote?
BuJaber wrote:I think it's time we knew who it is if it isn't jfm.
Mets who is your target?
If you or tobi are lying it helps us catch the liar later on if evidence doesn't match the claims.
It should also help town avoid being poisoned thus freeing any protective PRs to target other people who might be NK'd.
Sirius Kase wrote:Commuter is NOT a "known role", not to me at least. I've been operating under the assumption that it was something dakky made up. To me, a commuter is someone who drives a car to work. Just to let you how I think, I start with the real world definition, then try to adapt it to work in a world where everyone is a fish. As you see, commuter doesn't work in this world, so I figured he was being creative, and therefore probably scum.
Tobikera wrote:BuJaber wrote:I think it's time we knew who it is if it isn't jfm.
Mets who is your target?
If you or tobi are lying it helps us catch the liar later on if evidence doesn't match the claims.
It should also help town avoid being poisoned thus freeing any protective PRs to target other people who might be NK'd.
I assume you mean his target on N1? I've stated many times already what I did. When only blacky came up with a negative result on D2, I figured the person I misdirected, Metsfanmax, was the reason. Now, after N2, I see that logic might be in error. However, I voted for Metsfanmax believing he was scum on D2 and still have him on my FOS list, so I don't see how we are lying together as a team, if that is what you are implying. I gave you my two targets, Mets confirmed my action on the first and you suggested I was correct on the second, now you need Mets target to sort out anything else. This cow is dry.
BuJaber wrote:I think it's time we knew who it is if it isn't jfm.
Mets who is your target?
If you or tobi are lying it helps us catch the liar later on if evidence doesn't match the claims.
It should also help town avoid being poisoned thus freeing any protective PRs to target other people who might be NK'd.
Tobikera wrote:BuJaber wrote:I think it's time we knew who it is if it isn't jfm.
Mets who is your target?
If you or tobi are lying it helps us catch the liar later on if evidence doesn't match the claims.
It should also help town avoid being poisoned thus freeing any protective PRs to target other people who might be NK'd.
I assume you mean his target on N1? I've stated many times already what I did. When only blacky came up with a negative result on D2, I figured the person I misdirected, Metsfanmax, was the reason. Now, after N2, I see that logic might be in error. However, I voted for Metsfanmax believing he was scum on D2 and still have him on my FOS list, so I don't see how we are lying together as a team, if that is what you are implying. I gave you my two targets, Mets confirmed my action on the first and you suggested I was correct on the second, now you need Mets target to sort out anything else. This cow is dry.
ZaBeast wrote:- The poisoning of blacky was claimed by jfm
blacky365 wrote:Ragian wrote:Town commuter is a known town role, blacky, and it does something similar to what you're saying.
So if hes a town commuter, he is immune to night kills?
And then the only way he can be killed is a day lynch?
If thats the case then he will be the number one target for scum to lynch during the day... surely anyone who votes him would be scum... eek, do i unvote?
ZaBeast wrote:Just a note on the poisoner: if it's passive, wouldn't that just make it a version of paranoid gun owner?
Ragian wrote:I presume that he could be blocked and thus not hide...?
TX AG 90 wrote:BuJaber wrote:I think it's time we knew who it is if it isn't jfm.
Mets who is your target?
If you or tobi are lying it helps us catch the liar later on if evidence doesn't match the claims.
It should also help town avoid being poisoned thus freeing any protective PRs to target other people who might be NK'd.
agree, with blacky confirmation
Ragian wrote:blacky365 wrote:Ragian wrote:Town commuter is a known town role, blacky, and it does something similar to what you're saying.
So if hes a town commuter, he is immune to night kills?
And then the only way he can be killed is a day lynch?
If thats the case then he will be the number one target for scum to lynch during the day... surely anyone who votes him would be scum... eek, do i unvote?
I presume that he could be blocked and thus not hide...?ZaBeast wrote:Just a note on the poisoner: if it's passive, wouldn't that just make it a version of paranoid gun owner?
Well, yes, the difference being that the PGO kills instantly.
Re: poisoner, yeah it would make sense for that person to fess up, I presume. I was mulling over this, thinking that it would be nice if mafia targeted any passive poisoner, but then again, they could just cry help and be healed by SW. Perhaps get a majority vote on whether the poisoner should reveal her- or himself? I'm for. Counting Beast, too.
Speaking of that...why not kill SW last night? Did they need him to heal blacky? I dunno...
dakky21 wrote:Ragian wrote:I presume that he could be blocked and thus not hide...?
Read the link I sent few posts up. Commuter can't be blocked nor even a Strongman can kill me.
blacky365 wrote:Is this asking me to confirm something?
Not sure what im to confirm
dakky21 wrote:dakky21 wrote:Ragian wrote:I presume that he could be blocked and thus not hide...?
Read the link I sent few posts up. Commuter can't be blocked nor even a Strongman can kill me.
Though I'm not a Commuter, I'm a Hermit but the role is pretty much the same.
ZaBeast wrote:ZaBeast wrote:@mets, apart an investigative PR claiming he had incriminating evidence against jfm, what could have given you a scummy read on ifm then?
I'm still waiting on an answer, mets
BuJaber wrote:I think it's time we knew who it is if it isn't jfm.
Mets who is your target?
Mets wrote:Again, I only know who I requested to visit, but I am skeptical that I actually visited this person, since I know that the effect of my action was not applied to this person. Earlier in this day I suggested that I was redirected, but Tobi has claimed he didn't target me. And, having thought about it more since I originally brought it up, it's possible that there's another explanation than me being redirected: namely, that the passive poisoner also negates the action that was applied to them. But until I have more information, I'm not sure I want to share the identity of who I targeted.
Ragian wrote:Town commuter is a known town role, blacky, and it does something similar to what you're saying.
dakky21 wrote:Sirius Kase wrote:Commuter is NOT a "known role", not to me at least. I've been operating under the assumption that it was something dakky made up. To me, a commuter is someone who drives a car to work. Just to let you how I think, I start with the real world definition, then try to adapt it to work in a world where everyone is a fish. As you see, commuter doesn't work in this world, so I figured he was being creative, and therefore probably scum.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Commuter
It's a known town role. Anyway, difference between bulletproof VT and commuter is that if the Cop checks the player, bulletproof VT would come up as TOWN, while if Cop checks the Commuter, he would get no result.
Metsfanmax wrote:Mets wrote:Again, I only know who I requested to visit, but I am skeptical that I actually visited this person, since I know that the effect of my action was not applied to this person. Earlier in this day I suggested that I was redirected, but Tobi has claimed he didn't target me. And, having thought about it more since I originally brought it up, it's possible that there's another explanation than me being redirected: namely, that the passive poisoner also negates the action that was applied to them. But until I have more information, I'm not sure I want to share the identity of who I targeted.
If I keep saying this, maybe people will eventually read it?
chapcrap wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:Mets wrote:Again, I only know who I requested to visit, but I am skeptical that I actually visited this person, since I know that the effect of my action was not applied to this person. Earlier in this day I suggested that I was redirected, but Tobi has claimed he didn't target me. And, having thought about it more since I originally brought it up, it's possible that there's another explanation than me being redirected: namely, that the passive poisoner also negates the action that was applied to them. But until I have more information, I'm not sure I want to share the identity of who I targeted.
If I keep saying this, maybe people will eventually read it?
Got Fp'd by Mets...
I think we all read it. No one has any idea if they are getting redirected or not.
You and blacky could still say who you targeted and then we would know if there is a passive poisoner or if you are just making something up and jfm poisoned blacky. I'm leaning more and more that you are scummy.
Pikanchion wrote:blacky365 wrote:Is this asking me to confirm something?
Not sure what im to confirm
I believe TX AG 90 was asking for your confirmation of what Metsfanmax may or may not claim in the future regarding choice of target on the nights each of you were poisoned. Regardless, I did ask you to confirm something that you seem to have ignored.
BuJaber wrote:Yeah I forgot that post. I was only thinking about redirection, and Tobiman claimed to target me.
I'm not entirely convinced it's beneficial to keep the who hidden anyway, but I won't press the issue when there's an easier solution:
@Blacky - did you target anyone on N1?
blacky365 wrote:Originally I thought my target had poisoned me so I did not want to reveal who it was, however since jfm claimed (in a roundabout way) that he was my attacker, I reread the pm from the mod and the wording was that on my way to my target I was bumped into and I felt a pain in my side... so my target was not my poisoner but probably jfm or someone else.
Metsfanmax wrote:blacky365 wrote:Originally I thought my target had poisoned me so I did not want to reveal who it was, however since jfm claimed (in a roundabout way) that he was my attacker, I reread the pm from the mod and the wording was that on my way to my target I was bumped into and I felt a pain in my side... so my target was not my poisoner but probably jfm or someone else.
I confirm this language about a pain on the side of my body. However I was not told I was bumped into, and the language indicates that my target is the one who poisoned me.
(The "bumped into" bit sounds like what happened to Tobi on N2 though?)
BuJaber wrote:Fine this is going nowhere.
Probably a good thing, we can focus in real scumhunting.
Now vote dakky
Users browsing this forum: No registered users