Moderator: Community Team
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Campin_Killer wrote:safariguy5 wrote:I know you're probably new to this Streaker, but we already explained why nobody would probably come forward and claim. I joke voted you before, but this is the most suspicious thing I've seen so far, so my vote is on you for real this time. It sounds like you're trying to see if you can flush out a cop or investigative role.
Theherkman was doing the same thing, and he has played a couple of games.
Almost all newbs seem to do that, lolI mean I advocated for a no lynch and random bandwagoning... =D
aage wrote:@Squirrel: new players stay new if you keep killing 'em.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
aage wrote:Mr. Squirrel wrote:sooooo we are just giving all the relatively new players a free pass for today? Seems a bit off to me......
new players stay new if you keep killing 'em.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Skoffin wrote:...Chillin', lurkin' like a mofo...
Mr. Squirrel wrote:sooooo we are just giving all the relatively new players a free pass for today? Seems a bit off to me......
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
MeDeFe wrote:aage wrote:Mr. Squirrel wrote:sooooo we are just giving all the relatively new players a free pass for today? Seems a bit off to me......
new players stay new if you keep killing 'em.
Yeah, but on the other hand, if we give them a free pass, how will they ever learn?
Then again, I suppose it wouldn't hurt to put pressure on one of the more quiet people, has anyone kept tabs on the submariners? (I'm too lazy)
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
safariguy5 wrote:I'd also like to add, metagaming a bit here, that Night 0 ending so quickly probably means that active players in the mafia subforum probably have investigative roles. While I understand this means most of us, I'd like to point out that someone like tdans who's more active in other forums probably isn't an investigative role. Just bringing this up because we can learn something from an unusually short night period.
theherkman wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE Skoffin
Skoffin wrote:theherkman wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE Skoffin
Just curious, but is this a joke vote or did you take what I wrote seriously?
I don't know about you lot but I am going to completely ignore the timing of night 0 and when it ended. I think it a terrible idea to try to assume what people could have been online and thus could have had a role for it, plus all it takes is someone claiming "I think that guy was on at that time.." and fuzzy memories to send us into circling arguments. And really, if such an accusation were made, how would anyone defend on it? "Oh it couldn't have been me I was asleep at the time"? It has no game basis so I don't feel it appropriate to discuss in terms of lynching people.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users