Moderator: Community Team
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
john9blue wrote:I'm really not sure why I said that, as bottled water is one of the few areas in which the government trounces the private industry. I guess it just came to my mind when thinking of dumb wastes of money. Bottled water is a monument to the stupidity of man. Anyway...
Any money spent fighting against net neutrality.
AAFitz wrote:john9blue wrote:I'm really not sure why I said that, as bottled water is one of the few areas in which the government trounces the private industry. I guess it just came to my mind when thinking of dumb wastes of money. Bottled water is a monument to the stupidity of man. Anyway...
Any money spent fighting against net neutrality.
No. Contaminated water is the true monument of the stupidity of man.
Phatscotty wrote:AAFitz wrote:john9blue wrote:I'm really not sure why I said that, as bottled water is one of the few areas in which the government trounces the private industry. I guess it just came to my mind when thinking of dumb wastes of money. Bottled water is a monument to the stupidity of man. Anyway...
Any money spent fighting against net neutrality.
No. Contaminated water is the true monument of the stupidity of man.
When I take a dump, it magically dissapears!
AAFitz wrote:Phatscotty wrote:AAFitz wrote:john9blue wrote:I'm really not sure why I said that, as bottled water is one of the few areas in which the government trounces the private industry. I guess it just came to my mind when thinking of dumb wastes of money. Bottled water is a monument to the stupidity of man. Anyway...
Any money spent fighting against net neutrality.
No. Contaminated water is the true monument of the stupidity of man.
When I take a dump, it magically dissapears!
That kind of contamination is survivable. The carcinogenic kind is often less survivable.
Alternate answer "I dont know, it seems the forum is littered with them."
Johnny Rockets wrote:legalize and tax pot.
Phatscotty wrote:Johnny Rockets wrote:legalize and tax pot.
that would be a true stimulus bill. and they should sign it on hemp and then roll it up and smoke that shit!
hecter wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Johnny Rockets wrote:legalize and tax pot.
that would be a true stimulus bill. and they should sign it on hemp and then roll it up and smoke that shit!
You don't know much about hemp, do you?
Phatscotty wrote:hecter wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Johnny Rockets wrote:legalize and tax pot.
that would be a true stimulus bill. and they should sign it on hemp and then roll it up and smoke that shit!
You don't know much about hemp, do you?
I know you can make paper out of hemp. I know pot is smoked in papers. Is there something else I missed?
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
john9blue wrote:angola wrote:You should taste the tap water in West Texas. It is undrinkable and so full of chemicals in a sad attempt to make it drinkable, that cancer rates are sky high in this area.
Whatever, that stuff helps your immune system anyway.
jefjef wrote:Phatscotty wrote:hecter wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Johnny Rockets wrote:legalize and tax pot.
that would be a true stimulus bill. and they should sign it on hemp and then roll it up and smoke that shit!
You don't know much about hemp, do you?
I know you can make paper out of hemp. I know pot is smoked in papers. Is there something else I missed?
The rope?
angola wrote:The water comes from two mud pits somewhere out here. The only river that flows through West Texas is the Pecos, which is alkaline and tastes awful - plus I've rarely seen any water in it.
And there is no way whatever crap they put in the water out here is helping anyone, though I can't attest to that, because I use one of those office-type water coolers at my house.
Something the government can get rid of? Tax breaks for the rich.
Woodruff wrote:Cancer helps your immune system?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
THORNHEART wrote:I think we ought to cut woodruffs social security check...
john9blue wrote:angola wrote:The water comes from two mud pits somewhere out here. The only river that flows through West Texas is the Pecos, which is alkaline and tastes awful - plus I've rarely seen any water in it.
And there is no way whatever crap they put in the water out here is helping anyone, though I can't attest to that, because I use one of those office-type water coolers at my house.
Something the government can get rid of? Tax breaks for the rich.Woodruff wrote:Cancer helps your immune system?
Dammit, this is why I need to start using smileys again, so people can detect subtle sarcasm.
Neoteny wrote:Primary school education.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Phatscotty wrote:AAFitz wrote:Phatscotty wrote:AAFitz wrote:john9blue wrote:I'm really not sure why I said that, as bottled water is one of the few areas in which the government trounces the private industry. I guess it just came to my mind when thinking of dumb wastes of money. Bottled water is a monument to the stupidity of man. Anyway...
Any money spent fighting against net neutrality.
No. Contaminated water is the true monument of the stupidity of man.
When I take a dump, it magically dissapears!
That kind of contamination is survivable. The carcinogenic kind is often less survivable.
Alternate answer "I dont know, it seems the forum is littered with them."
that depends on how many people are taking a dump. I think you are overstating the non-contaminations value, that only being true in a small, very very small population
AAFitz wrote:Phatscotty wrote:AAFitz wrote:Phatscotty wrote:AAFitz wrote:
No. Contaminated water is the true monument of the stupidity of man.
When I take a dump, it magically dissapears!
That kind of contamination is survivable. The carcinogenic kind is often less survivable.
Alternate answer "I dont know, it seems the forum is littered with them."
that depends on how many people are taking a dump. I think you are overstating the non-contaminations value, that only being true in a small, very very small population
Yes, I actually meant usually survivable but I think "usually" got lost in the editing process. And given the choice, of a known carcinogen, and drinking water with your dump in it..........
I might take the chances of a cancer cure being developed.
(cue: cancer cure wont be developed because all medical money will be going to lower income people that wont contribute to medical services responses.)
MeDeFe wrote:Let's see, before police...
70% of the military budget
jay_a2j wrote:NASA
And unnecessary research like to see how fast katsup pours out of a bottle
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users