Conquer Club

would you get married for 1,000 years

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Would you get married for 1,000 years?

 
Total votes : 0

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby AndyDufresne on Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:20 pm

Haggis_McMutton wrote:
heavycola wrote:What if i told you he was over 300 years old?


I wouldn't buy it. Mostly because a 300 year old couldn't sport such a rockin' hat.


Or would they, just to throw you off? Dun dun dun!


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby daddy1gringo on Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:24 pm

Now I have to remind myself first of all that a lot of this is in jest, and second that a lot of you are really young and just don’t know any better, but Good Lord how dismal. It’s no wonder the freaking divorce rate is doing a Saturn 5. Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.

I’ve been waiting for Woodruff, or perhaps someone else to chime in so people don’t just say ā€œYeah right, that’s just your Christian propaganda,ā€ but unless I’ve badly misread things from his posts I’m sure he will corroborate a lot of this.

Later this month I will be married (to the same woman) for 23 years, so I know what I am talking about, and I would absolutely marry her for 1000, or more. Our marriage is a process of becoming one, body soul, and spirit, and getting to know each other and ourselves more and more intimately, and it is an adventure. Our marriage, including but not limited to sex is continually made new because our relationship is always evolving: growing and deepening.

Sure life, including sex, goes through dry spells when everything is routine, but those dry spells are where you exercise your commitment to each other that just causes you to respect and trust one another more. You hang onto each other, and the fire comes back, better than ever. If it doesn’t come back soon enough, you take steps to bring it back.

I think I’ll stop there for now. By the way, my 16-year-old read the thread and said, ā€œThese people are stupid. If you are marrying for life and it’s only 40 years, then you’re dead anyway.ā€ Smart kid.
The right answer to the wrong question is still the wrong answer to the real question.
User avatar
Lieutenant daddy1gringo
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Connecticut yankee expatriated in Houston, Texas area, by way of Isabela, NW PR

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby natty dread on Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:29 pm

daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.


Says the guy who thinks marriage is defined by a supernatural entity.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby Haggis_McMutton on Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:56 pm

daddy1gringo wrote:Now I have to remind myself first of all that a lot of this is in jest, and second that a lot of you are really young and just don’t know any better, but Good Lord how dismal. It’s no wonder the freaking divorce rate is doing a Saturn 5. Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.

I’ve been waiting for Woodruff, or perhaps someone else to chime in so people don’t just say ā€œYeah right, that’s just your Christian propaganda,ā€ but unless I’ve badly misread things from his posts I’m sure he will corroborate a lot of this.

Later this month I will be married (to the same woman) for 23 years, so I know what I am talking about, and I would absolutely marry her for 1000, or more. Our marriage is a process of becoming one, body soul, and spirit, and getting to know each other and ourselves more and more intimately, and it is an adventure. Our marriage, including but not limited to sex is continually made new because our relationship is always evolving: growing and deepening.

Sure life, including sex, goes through dry spells when everything is routine, but those dry spells are where you exercise your commitment to each other that just causes you to respect and trust one another more. You hang onto each other, and the fire comes back, better than ever. If it doesn’t come back soon enough, you take steps to bring it back.

I think I’ll stop there for now. By the way, my 16-year-old read the thread and said, ā€œThese people are stupid. If you are marrying for life and it’s only 40 years, then you’re dead anyway.ā€ Smart kid.


Well, it's great that it works for you.
This does not mean however that it could work for everyone.
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
Major Haggis_McMutton
 
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby heavycola on Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:27 am

daddy1gringo wrote:Sure life, including sex, goes through dry spells


Image

On a more serious note - dude if you really do look like aragorn then it's no surprise your marriage works. Hell, I"d marry you. Maybe not for 1,00 years though - maybe like 200.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby yang guize on Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:36 am

why would anyone get married? all it means is having children and some stupid woman barking in your ear about paying for everything.

if you get married then when your wife gets old and boring you have to put up with her. if you keep concubines then you just throw them away when they're older than 25 and get some new ones.
User avatar
New Recruit yang guize
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: Peking LOL

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby BigBallinStalin on Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:05 am

Does every land owner in China have a concubine? Or were both land owners and concubines exterminated when the Maoists took over?
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby daddy1gringo on Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:52 am

Well, welcome back heavycolon, I noticed you have started posting again after a long absence (or should I say "long dry spell"?) You were missed.
heavycola wrote:
daddy1gringo wrote:Sure life, including sex, goes through dry spells


Image
OK, I asked for that one. "Dry spells" was redundant anyway; I should've just said "goes through times when everything is routine...".

heavycola wrote:On a more serious note - dude if you really do look like aragorn then it's no surprise your marriage works. Hell, I"d marry you. Maybe not for 1,00 years though - maybe like 200.
Nah, the 2 times anybody has commented on an actual picture of me on the internet and compared me to someone, it has been "Qui-gon" and "Steve Jobs", both of whom are better-looking than I am, but dead (so presumably not so good-looking anymore). (No, Liam Neeson isn't dead, but Qui-gon is. Gimme a break.)

On the "living to 1000" thing, that's a fallacy. The average lifespan is increasing, largely due to the decrease in infant mortality (you remove all those really low numbers and of course the average goes up) but people don't live to be significantly older than they used to, just more people live to be that old, raising the average. The oldest still don't make it past 120 or 130 or so. There were people in the middle ages who lived that long, according to parish records, which historians consider more or less reliable, just, as I said, not as many as today.


natty dread wrote:
daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.


Says the guy who thinks marriage is defined by a supernatural entity.
I said nothing about a "supernatural entity" here, and the very next thing I said after what you quoted is that even people who don't believe in God, but who have a healthy idea of what marriage is would agree with me.

Are you indeed so bigoted that you reject sound advice from someone just because they are a Christian? How liberal and open-minded of you. My concept works, and beautifully, how's yours doin'?

Haggis_McMutton wrote:Well, it's great that it works for you.
This does not mean however that it could work for everyone.
Thanks for a respectful and reasoned disagreement.

Anyway, that's my point: marriage, as apparently most people view it today, doesn't "work". What causes it to "work" is, as a non-Christian that I mentioned said in another thread, putting in the "work" to put one's partner and the new entity that is the marriage above one's selfish, short-term interest. The result is that you get all the good things that you didn't put first -- great sex and companionship that is satisfying to you -- along with the ones that you did put first. (I could give clear Biblical references to this principle, but then I'd risk turning off certain people)
The right answer to the wrong question is still the wrong answer to the real question.
User avatar
Lieutenant daddy1gringo
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Connecticut yankee expatriated in Houston, Texas area, by way of Isabela, NW PR

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby daddy1gringo on Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:57 am

yang guize wrote:why would anyone get married? all it means is having children and some stupid woman barking in your ear about paying for everything.

if you get married then when your wife gets old and boring you have to put up with her. if you keep concubines then you just throw them away when they're older than 25 and get some new ones.
See my first post.
The right answer to the wrong question is still the wrong answer to the real question.
User avatar
Lieutenant daddy1gringo
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Connecticut yankee expatriated in Houston, Texas area, by way of Isabela, NW PR

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby Bleed_Green on Tue Aug 07, 2012 2:31 pm

Life sentence is Canada is 25 years and that is what I told my wife prior to saying our vows.. Will let her know after 25 if I want to opt for a 25 more or take the parol
Image

Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him to phish and he'll charge your credit card for lunch forever. ;)
User avatar
Captain Bleed_Green
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:37 am

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby Haggis_McMutton on Tue Aug 07, 2012 2:41 pm

daddy1gringo wrote:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Well, it's great that it works for you.
This does not mean however that it could work for everyone.
Thanks for a respectful and reasoned disagreement.

Anyway, that's my point: marriage, as apparently most people view it today, doesn't "work". What causes it to "work" is, as a non-Christian that I mentioned said in another thread, putting in the "work" to put one's partner and the new entity that is the marriage above one's selfish, short-term interest. The result is that you get all the good things that you didn't put first -- great sex and companionship that is satisfying to you -- along with the ones that you did put first. (I could give clear Biblical references to this principle, but then I'd risk turning off certain people)


Ok, but do you think every couple could be happy together even if they "put in the work"? Is it not possible that marriage just isn't for some people?
It does, after all, sort of go against our genetics. We didn't evolve to be monogamous.

I think marriage just doesn't work for some( most ? ) people, and it is harmfull for us a society to send the message that if you don't get married for life you have somehow failed.
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
Major Haggis_McMutton
 
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby MoB Deadly on Tue Aug 07, 2012 2:48 pm

tkr4lf wrote:A thousand years with the same person, no matter who that person is, would get incredibly old and boring. I don't care if it's Jessica Alba, after the 20,000th time of hitting that, it wouldn't be fun anymore.


I DONT CARE ABOUT THE REST OF THIS THREAD. BUT THIS IS FALSE
Image
Art by: codierose | High Score: 2550
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class MoB Deadly
 
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:07 am

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby Maugena on Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:49 pm

Haggis_McMutton wrote:We didn't evolve to be monogamous.

It's advantageous to be able to produce with more than one mate. If some serious shit goes down and everyone's significant other (male or female - it doesn't matter as long as there is at least one of each that is potent/fertile) dies, then our species would be fucked.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:[..] and it is harmfull for us a society to send the message that if you don't get married for life you have somehow failed.

Yeah.. We don't know what's best for humanity, necessarily. Marriage isn't necessary to continue the human race. Branding anyone a failure is pretty much a fuckbag's type of thing.
MoB Deadly wrote:
tkr4lf wrote:A thousand years with the same person, no matter who that person is, would get incredibly old and boring. I don't care if it's Jessica Alba, after the 20,000th time of hitting that, it wouldn't be fun anymore.


I DONT CARE ABOUT THE REST OF THIS THREAD. BUT THIS IS FALSE

My guess is that you're only saying that because you're Jessica Alba's stalker.
Renewed yet infused with apathy.
Let's just have a good time, all right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjQii_BboIk
User avatar
New Recruit Maugena
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:07 pm

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby yang guize on Tue Aug 07, 2012 6:39 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:Does every land owner in China have a concubine? Or were both land owners and concubines exterminated when the Maoists took over?


how do you mean by 'land owner'?

one of mao's mistakes was declaring that concubines should not be kept (he felt it was bourgeois). since the decline of maoism concubines have returned, although acceptance is not so widespread as it once was. there are plenty of rich businessmen who keep concubines to display their wealth.
User avatar
New Recruit yang guize
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: Peking LOL

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby BigBallinStalin on Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:23 pm

yang guize wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Does every land owner in China have a concubine? Or were both land owners and concubines exterminated when the Maoists took over?


how do you mean by 'land owner'?

one of mao's mistakes was declaring that concubines should not be kept (he felt it was bourgeois). since the decline of maoism concubines have returned, although acceptance is not so widespread as it once was. there are plenty of rich businessmen who keep concubines to display their wealth.


how do you mean by 'wealth'?
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby Lootifer on Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:32 am

yang guize wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Does every land owner in China have a concubine? Or were both land owners and concubines exterminated when the Maoists took over?


how do you mean by 'land owner'?

one of mao's mistakes was declaring that concubines should not be kept (he felt it was bourgeois). since the decline of maoism concubines have returned, although acceptance is not so widespread as it once was. there are plenty of rich businessmen who keep concubines to display their wealth.

Image
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Postby 2dimes on Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:55 am

daddy1gringo wrote:
heavycola wrote:On a more serious note - dude if you really do look like aragorn then it's no surprise your marriage works. Hell, I"d marry you. Maybe not for 1,00 years though - maybe like 200.
Nah, the 2 times anybody has commented on an actual picture of me on the internet and compared me to someone, it has been "Qui-gon" and...

Get a hair cut man!!
Haggis_McMutton wrote:
daddy1gringo wrote:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Well, it's great that it works for you.
This does not mean however that it could work for everyone.
Thanks for a respectful and reasoned disagreement.

Anyway, that's my point: marriage, as apparently most people view it today, doesn't "work". What causes it to "work" is, as a non-Christian that I mentioned said in another thread, putting in the "work" to put one's partner and the new entity that is the marriage above one's selfish, short-term interest. The result is that you get all the good things that you didn't put first -- great sex and companionship that is satisfying to you -- along with the ones that you did put first. (I could give clear Biblical references to this principle, but then I'd risk turning off certain people)


Ok, but do you think every couple could be happy together even if they "put in the work"? Is it not possible that marriage just isn't for some people?
It does, after all, sort of go against our genetics. We didn't evolve to be monogamous.

I think marriage just doesn't work for some( most ? ) people, and it is harmfull for us a society to send the message that if you don't get married for life you have somehow failed.


Maybe I'm over simplifying it but. Why have marriage if it's impossible?

Now that I'm in one, marriage sure isn't "for me." The first two - four years on the other hand... Shall we call it the "Jessica Albamoon"? That part is. After that it's just more work than it appears. I look at Woodruff and think, "Why's he so lucky, to find a good wife?" ignoring the fact he "put in the work" to be a good husband and forgot/didn't post that week he wanted to murder and replace her.

More so why is the world pretending it's such an important issue to either, "Allow people to marry others of the same gender." or "Prevent people from marrying others of the same gender."
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 13098
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby zimmah on Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:45 am

natty dread wrote:
daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.


Says the guy who thinks marriage is defined by a supernatural entity.


Mind you, the supernatural entity is the one who created marriage, I don't even know why you atheists even marry, it's a religious thing. And it's also a promise to god, your parnter and the world that you stay together until death itself completes the contract. If you break the contract, not only do you betray your parnter, you also betray god.
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby zimmah on Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:47 am

heavycola wrote:
daddy1gringo wrote:Sure life, including sex, goes through dry spells


Image

On a more serious note - dude if you really do look like aragorn then it's no surprise your marriage works. Hell, I"d marry you. Maybe not for 1,00 years though - maybe like 200.


No wonder your relations do not work. All you guys care about it looks.
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby comic boy on Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:02 am

zimmah wrote:
natty dread wrote:
daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.


Says the guy who thinks marriage is defined by a supernatural entity.


Mind you, the supernatural entity is the one who created marriage, I don't even know why you atheists even marry, it's a religious thing. And it's also a promise to god, your parnter and the world that you stay together until death itself completes the contract. If you break the contract, not only do you betray your parnter, you also betray god.


Thats your belief which is fine in itself but it doesn't explain why so many ' religious ' couples get divorced and more pertinently it doesn't add anything to the debate.
Im a TOFU miSfit
User avatar
Brigadier comic boy
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: London

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby zimmah on Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:08 am

comic boy wrote:
zimmah wrote:
natty dread wrote:
daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.


Says the guy who thinks marriage is defined by a supernatural entity.


Mind you, the supernatural entity is the one who created marriage, I don't even know why you atheists even marry, it's a religious thing. And it's also a promise to god, your parnter and the world that you stay together until death itself completes the contract. If you break the contract, not only do you betray your parnter, you also betray god.


Thats your belief which is fine in itself but it doesn't explain why so many ' religious ' couples get divorced and more pertinently it doesn't add anything to the debate.


Because they are still human. And it's not my belief either, it's a fact that marriage started from the bible. Of course nowadays almost no one marries in the church anymore, but still, it's a religious ceremony.

It's kinda useless to even get married as a nonbeliever.

And religious people divorcing is sad, actually any kind of divorce is sad, but we're still human, so we do make mistakes.
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby thegreekdog on Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:22 am

Practically speaking, if we're talking about only looks, someone who is 70 likely looks substantially similar to someone who is 985.

If we're talking about boredom, I suspect there would be a number of things, other than marriage, that one would be bored with. Plus, you know, if the retirement age is 950 instead of 65, you don't get to see your spouse as much as you would think.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Postby 2dimes on Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:52 am

Is it better or worse if they stay attractive sexually. How long is cialis going to remain effective? Wouldn't it just be more frustrating if your spouse is a super hunky, distinguished 126 year old guy and you can't do anything about it anyways?
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 13098
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: would you get married for 1,000 years

Postby comic boy on Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:30 pm

zimmah wrote:
comic boy wrote:
zimmah wrote:
natty dread wrote:
daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.


Says the guy who thinks marriage is defined by a supernatural entity.


Mind you, the supernatural entity is the one who created marriage, I don't even know why you atheists even marry, it's a religious thing. And it's also a promise to god, your parnter and the world that you stay together until death itself completes the contract. If you break the contract, not only do you betray your parnter, you also betray god.


Thats your belief which is fine in itself but it doesn't explain why so many ' religious ' couples get divorced and more pertinently it doesn't add anything to the debate.


Because they are still human. And it's not my belief either, it's a fact that marriage started from the bible. Of course nowadays almost no one marries in the church anymore, but still, it's a religious ceremony.

It's kinda useless to even get married as a nonbeliever.

And religious people divorcing is sad, actually any kind of divorce is sad, but we're still human, so we do make mistakes.


I dont know where you get your information from but marriage did not originate in the bible.
In actual fact the religious marriage contract you subscribe to is fairly recent , it was codified by the RC Church in the 16th century. Even after this date most protestant groups , including the English pilgrims , insisted that marriage was a secular matter.
Last edited by comic boy on Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Im a TOFU miSfit
User avatar
Brigadier comic boy
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: London

Re:

Postby thegreekdog on Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:33 pm

2dimes wrote:Is it better or worse if they stay attractive sexually. How long is cialis going to remain effective? Wouldn't it just be more frustrating if your spouse is a super hunky, distinguished 126 year old guy and you can't do anything about it anyways?


I suspect that once a spouse gets to age 60 or so, sexual attractiveness becomes less important (no offense intended, Saxi).
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users