Haggis_McMutton wrote:heavycola wrote:What if i told you he was over 300 years old?
I wouldn't buy it. Mostly because a 300 year old couldn't sport such a rockin' hat.
Or would they, just to throw you off? Dun dun dun!
--Andy
Moderator: Community Team
Haggis_McMutton wrote:heavycola wrote:What if i told you he was over 300 years old?
I wouldn't buy it. Mostly because a 300 year old couldn't sport such a rockin' hat.













daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.














daddy1gringo wrote:Now I have to remind myself first of all that a lot of this is in jest, and second that a lot of you are really young and just donāt know any better, but Good Lord how dismal. Itās no wonder the freaking divorce rate is doing a Saturn 5. Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.
Iāve been waiting for Woodruff, or perhaps someone else to chime in so people donāt just say āYeah right, thatās just your Christian propaganda,ā but unless Iāve badly misread things from his posts Iām sure he will corroborate a lot of this.
Later this month I will be married (to the same woman) for 23 years, so I know what I am talking about, and I would absolutely marry her for 1000, or more. Our marriage is a process of becoming one, body soul, and spirit, and getting to know each other and ourselves more and more intimately, and it is an adventure. Our marriage, including but not limited to sex is continually made new because our relationship is always evolving: growing and deepening.
Sure life, including sex, goes through dry spells when everything is routine, but those dry spells are where you exercise your commitment to each other that just causes you to respect and trust one another more. You hang onto each other, and the fire comes back, better than ever. If it doesnāt come back soon enough, you take steps to bring it back.
I think Iāll stop there for now. By the way, my 16-year-old read the thread and said, āThese people are stupid. If you are marrying for life and itās only 40 years, then youāre dead anyway.ā Smart kid.












daddy1gringo wrote:Sure life, including sex, goes through dry spells
























OK, I asked for that one. "Dry spells" was redundant anyway; I should've just said "goes through times when everything is routine...".heavycola wrote:daddy1gringo wrote:Sure life, including sex, goes through dry spells
Nah, the 2 times anybody has commented on an actual picture of me on the internet and compared me to someone, it has been "Qui-gon" and "Steve Jobs", both of whom are better-looking than I am, but dead (so presumably not so good-looking anymore). (No, Liam Neeson isn't dead, but Qui-gon is. Gimme a break.)heavycola wrote:On a more serious note - dude if you really do look like aragorn then it's no surprise your marriage works. Hell, I"d marry you. Maybe not for 1,00 years though - maybe like 200.
I said nothing about a "supernatural entity" here, and the very next thing I said after what you quoted is that even people who don't believe in God, but who have a healthy idea of what marriage is would agree with me.natty dread wrote:daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.
Says the guy who thinks marriage is defined by a supernatural entity.
Thanks for a respectful and reasoned disagreement.Haggis_McMutton wrote:Well, it's great that it works for you.
This does not mean however that it could work for everyone.

See my first post.yang guize wrote:why would anyone get married? all it means is having children and some stupid woman barking in your ear about paying for everything.
if you get married then when your wife gets old and boring you have to put up with her. if you keep concubines then you just throw them away when they're older than 25 and get some new ones.




















daddy1gringo wrote:Thanks for a respectful and reasoned disagreement.Haggis_McMutton wrote:Well, it's great that it works for you.
This does not mean however that it could work for everyone.
Anyway, that's my point: marriage, as apparently most people view it today, doesn't "work". What causes it to "work" is, as a non-Christian that I mentioned said in another thread, putting in the "work" to put one's partner and the new entity that is the marriage above one's selfish, short-term interest. The result is that you get all the good things that you didn't put first -- great sex and companionship that is satisfying to you -- along with the ones that you did put first. (I could give clear Biblical references to this principle, but then I'd risk turning off certain people)












tkr4lf wrote:A thousand years with the same person, no matter who that person is, would get incredibly old and boring. I don't care if it's Jessica Alba, after the 20,000th time of hitting that, it wouldn't be fun anymore.




























Haggis_McMutton wrote:We didn't evolve to be monogamous.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:[..] and it is harmfull for us a society to send the message that if you don't get married for life you have somehow failed.
MoB Deadly wrote:tkr4lf wrote:A thousand years with the same person, no matter who that person is, would get incredibly old and boring. I don't care if it's Jessica Alba, after the 20,000th time of hitting that, it wouldn't be fun anymore.
I DONT CARE ABOUT THE REST OF THIS THREAD. BUT THIS IS FALSE
BigBallinStalin wrote:Does every land owner in China have a concubine? Or were both land owners and concubines exterminated when the Maoists took over?
yang guize wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Does every land owner in China have a concubine? Or were both land owners and concubines exterminated when the Maoists took over?
how do you mean by 'land owner'?
one of mao's mistakes was declaring that concubines should not be kept (he felt it was bourgeois). since the decline of maoism concubines have returned, although acceptance is not so widespread as it once was. there are plenty of rich businessmen who keep concubines to display their wealth.

















yang guize wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Does every land owner in China have a concubine? Or were both land owners and concubines exterminated when the Maoists took over?
how do you mean by 'land owner'?
one of mao's mistakes was declaring that concubines should not be kept (he felt it was bourgeois). since the decline of maoism concubines have returned, although acceptance is not so widespread as it once was. there are plenty of rich businessmen who keep concubines to display their wealth.









daddy1gringo wrote:Nah, the 2 times anybody has commented on an actual picture of me on the internet and compared me to someone, it has been "Qui-gon" and...heavycola wrote:On a more serious note - dude if you really do look like aragorn then it's no surprise your marriage works. Hell, I"d marry you. Maybe not for 1,00 years though - maybe like 200.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:daddy1gringo wrote:Thanks for a respectful and reasoned disagreement.Haggis_McMutton wrote:Well, it's great that it works for you.
This does not mean however that it could work for everyone.
Anyway, that's my point: marriage, as apparently most people view it today, doesn't "work". What causes it to "work" is, as a non-Christian that I mentioned said in another thread, putting in the "work" to put one's partner and the new entity that is the marriage above one's selfish, short-term interest. The result is that you get all the good things that you didn't put first -- great sex and companionship that is satisfying to you -- along with the ones that you did put first. (I could give clear Biblical references to this principle, but then I'd risk turning off certain people)
Ok, but do you think every couple could be happy together even if they "put in the work"? Is it not possible that marriage just isn't for some people?
It does, after all, sort of go against our genetics. We didn't evolve to be monogamous.
I think marriage just doesn't work for some( most ? ) people, and it is harmfull for us a society to send the message that if you don't get married for life you have somehow failed.













natty dread wrote:daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.
Says the guy who thinks marriage is defined by a supernatural entity.




















heavycola wrote:daddy1gringo wrote:Sure life, including sex, goes through dry spells
On a more serious note - dude if you really do look like aragorn then it's no surprise your marriage works. Hell, I"d marry you. Maybe not for 1,00 years though - maybe like 200.




















zimmah wrote:natty dread wrote:daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.
Says the guy who thinks marriage is defined by a supernatural entity.
Mind you, the supernatural entity is the one who created marriage, I don't even know why you atheists even marry, it's a religious thing. And it's also a promise to god, your parnter and the world that you stay together until death itself completes the contract. If you break the contract, not only do you betray your parnter, you also betray god.











comic boy wrote:zimmah wrote:natty dread wrote:daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.
Says the guy who thinks marriage is defined by a supernatural entity.
Mind you, the supernatural entity is the one who created marriage, I don't even know why you atheists even marry, it's a religious thing. And it's also a promise to god, your parnter and the world that you stay together until death itself completes the contract. If you break the contract, not only do you betray your parnter, you also betray god.
Thats your belief which is fine in itself but it doesn't explain why so many ' religious ' couples get divorced and more pertinently it doesn't add anything to the debate.





















































zimmah wrote:comic boy wrote:zimmah wrote:natty dread wrote:daddy1gringo wrote: Nobody has any freaking clue what marriage is.
Says the guy who thinks marriage is defined by a supernatural entity.
Mind you, the supernatural entity is the one who created marriage, I don't even know why you atheists even marry, it's a religious thing. And it's also a promise to god, your parnter and the world that you stay together until death itself completes the contract. If you break the contract, not only do you betray your parnter, you also betray god.
Thats your belief which is fine in itself but it doesn't explain why so many ' religious ' couples get divorced and more pertinently it doesn't add anything to the debate.
Because they are still human. And it's not my belief either, it's a fact that marriage started from the bible. Of course nowadays almost no one marries in the church anymore, but still, it's a religious ceremony.
It's kinda useless to even get married as a nonbeliever.
And religious people divorcing is sad, actually any kind of divorce is sad, but we're still human, so we do make mistakes.











2dimes wrote:Is it better or worse if they stay attractive sexually. How long is cialis going to remain effective? Wouldn't it just be more frustrating if your spouse is a super hunky, distinguished 126 year old guy and you can't do anything about it anyways?




















Users browsing this forum: No registered users