Moderator: Community Team
darvlay wrote:Get over it, people. It's just a crazy lookin' bear ejaculating into the waiting maw of an eager fox. Nothing more.
no.brooksieb wrote:political stance, Communism, socialism, liberalism that kind of thingPrawn_UK wrote:Brooksie...is this a fiscal or non-fiscal leaning that you are reffering to?
QFT.Prawn_UK wrote:no.brooksieb wrote:political stance, Communism, socialism, liberalism that kind of thingPrawn_UK wrote:Brooksie...is this a fiscal or non-fiscal leaning that you are reffering to?
Please, try and know what you are talking about.
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
meh... the 1-dimensional view works as a basic "in a nutshell" summary of your stance, while the 2-dimensional view explains more fully.Prawn_UK wrote:no.brooksieb wrote:political stance, Communism, socialism, liberalism that kind of thingPrawn_UK wrote:Brooksie...is this a fiscal or non-fiscal leaning that you are reffering to?
Please, try and know what you are talking about.
Things such as political aleigances are never linear. They are barely even square either. I see my own political alleigance as cubic at a push, discounting the 4th dimension of time.
OK, i've lost you. Let me explain this to you.
There is no simple way of expressing one's political alleigance, as simply as you have tried. For instance, one may have capitalistic views (ie right wing) but may also hold liberal views (ie left wing). Som, which is he? left or right? left/right/left/right or is he a lefty-righty? righty-lefty? NO!
Basically, in the 2 dimensional thought line of these general subjects, there is thought to be a cross-section of fiscal views, and non-fiscal views....where would a market-liberal stand on your linear scale? where would a stalinist stand on your scale? see, just to say that one has staunchly liberal views, does not mean to say one is a communist...capiche?
So, this covers most eventualities, although I admit that the more intellectual political debater (ie, me) will see problems in this 2 dimensional idea as well....I will not attempt to explain why I feel this.
But anywho...try in future to lay your options out more logically in future.
I have not voted in this poll.
darvlay wrote:Get over it, people. It's just a crazy lookin' bear ejaculating into the waiting maw of an eager fox. Nothing more.
luns101 wrote:You should be able to convert a soul from 500 yards away armed only with a Gideon New Testament that you found at a Holiday Inn!!!!
muy_thaiguy wrote:Sir! Permission to do 50 push-ups with the Ark of the Covenant on my back?
A 3 dimensional system seems to be what you are discribing; three axis: Social, Economic and Motivation. Social and Ecomonic are self-explamatory (Bolshevics are authoritarian socially and collective economically), Motivation is how far you would go to further your "Cause".Prawn_UK wrote:no.brooksieb wrote:political stance, Communism, socialism, liberalism that kind of thingPrawn_UK wrote:Brooksie...is this a fiscal or non-fiscal leaning that you are reffering to?
Please, try and know what you are talking about.
Things such as political aleigances are never linear. They are barely even square either. I see my own political alleigance as cubic at a push, discounting the 4th dimension of time.
OK, i've lost you. Let me explain this to you.
There is no simple way of expressing one's political alleigance, as simply as you have tried. For instance, one may have capitalistic views (ie right wing) but may also hold liberal views (ie left wing). Som, which is he? left or right? left/right/left/right or is he a lefty-righty? righty-lefty? NO!
Basically, in the 2 dimensional thought line of these general subjects, there is thought to be a cross-section of fiscal views, and non-fiscal views....where would a market-liberal stand on your linear scale? where would a stalinist stand on your scale? see, just to say that one has staunchly liberal views, does not mean to say one is a communist...capiche?
So, this covers most eventualities, although I admit that the more intellectual political debater (ie, me) will see problems in this 2 dimensional idea as well....I will not attempt to explain why I feel this.
But anywho...try in future to lay your options out more logically in future.
I have not voted in this poll.