Moderator: Community Team
yorkiepeter wrote:Iliad,when I was making out a case against ET it was at a time when we had very little evidence to go on. I admitted that the evidence was a little shaky, but it was all we had to go on.
Just because he was claiming to be a power role does not make him exempt to be accused.
However, he has been behaving a lot less scummy lately and I am inclined to believe him now. Mainly because there is no-one claiming cop so I think there is no cop and therefore they must surely be a tracker, and no-one has counterclaimed him.
If I believe him then it puts a whole new light on William. He has been behaving incredibly scummy lately, first accusing everyone who did not jump on his iliad bandwagon as being scummy, then changing his vote to me cos I voted for him. But the fact remains that he could have hammered ET, a power role but didn't. I rreally can't see how william can be scum if ET is telling the truth.
So for now unvote
that's actually a good idea. Post your ideas of every person in the gameSkoffin wrote: Haha.. I like that 'yet' at the end thar.
Anywho, I think it might be a good idea if we all did a list like that, it might give us a better idea of where we all stand and we can compare easier and find a consensus on who to lynch. Thoughts?
Iliad wrote:Yorkie trying to defend william(I know you also accused him but that last few comments render your accusations useless) is great for you now. william has been scummy but we have to be careful. I don't think there are many protective roles so we need to get today right.
Will post what I think of each player in a minute
militant wrote:Vote Count
sam_levi_11 (4) cena-rules, ExplainThis, Lord Voldemort, Kernal_Kronic
philh wrote:sam - bulletproof claim. That people think he's acting scummy only further convinces me that that's not a good metric
cena-rules wrote:vc from day 1militant wrote:Vote Count
sam_levi_11 (4) cena-rules, ExplainThis, Lord Voldemort, Kernal_Kronic
why wouls lovo vote sam (his mason buddy?) and add pressure which leads to a claim
william18 wrote:If I was scum I would have hammered ET a while back. I'm not scum.
I really have a feeling that yorkie is scum.
yorkiepeter wrote:william18 wrote:If I was scum I would have hammered ET a while back. I'm not scum.
I really have a feeling that yorkie is scum.
what happened to your vote Iliad campaign?
you asked me why I wasn't voting Iliad and that I must be scum otherwise I'd have jumped on his bw. You said anyone who doesn't vote Iliad must be scum.
Presumably you could not muster up enough votes for him so now you are trying to start a bw against me. If this fails which townie will you try next? No wonder you urged the cop not to reveal townie results.
Despite you not hammering ET I really do feel you are scum.
Tell me William, did you enjoy KK?
sam_levi_11 wrote:also what does this meanphilh wrote:sam - bulletproof claim. That people think he's acting scummy only further convinces me that that's not a good metric
lord voldemort wrote:sam_levi_11 wrote:who do you support....chelsea? spurs? or as i thought...liverpool!
arsenal rule
stay fricken on topic
vote sam
lets get some pressure going
philh wrote:
As for LoVo, I'm confused now. But the wagon only got to -2, and he unvoted without giving a reason before sam claimed. Possibly he only voted to get something moving, but then I don't get why he picked sam. ET was already on 3, and sam was only on 2 at the time.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users