Conquer Club

If you're country was in danger........

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

would you stand and fight?

 
Total votes : 0

Postby nagerous on Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:39 pm

brooksieb wrote:
nagerous wrote:Enough of these annoying ass threads. I don't get why wicked would lock my thread about the game when these kind of threads, set up by brooksie, with the same right wing bs don't ever get locked and hes allowed to roam free.


How is it BS and right wing? anyone could fight for their' country, a lefty could fight for their' country, a righty could fight for their' country, anyone could, if it's so annoying don't comment on it?! just let it die!


Its not necessary this thread I'm referring to, there are numerous similar ones you've set up all based around issues like undying loyalty to country, closing down on immigration, sensitive issues like political correctness.
User avatar
Captain nagerous
 
Posts: 7513
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:39 am

Postby muy_thaiguy on Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:42 pm

Anyways...I would certainly do so, even if it was with my bare hands (thank you 4 years of Martial Arts, not to mention learning about all kinds of close quartered combat), up to riding around in a tank causing all kinds of mayhem.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby bradleybadly on Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:55 pm

yeah I'd fight

I think a lot of people who say they wouldn't would change their minds once the battle began
User avatar
Corporal bradleybadly
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:53 pm
Location: Yes

Postby greenoaks on Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:05 pm

will random.org be used to decide who wins the battles ?
User avatar
Sergeant greenoaks
 
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Postby Kid_A on Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:06 pm

i'd run. i'm not dying for you douchebags!
User avatar
Major Kid_A
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:40 pm
Location: San Francisco

Postby suggs on Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:07 pm

greenoaks wrote:will random.org be used to decide who wins the battles ?


How do you think we won WWII?
WE had ludicrous dice from 1943 onwards.
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class suggs
 
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Postby brooksieb on Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:09 pm

nagerous wrote:
brooksieb wrote:
nagerous wrote:Enough of these annoying ass threads. I don't get why wicked would lock my thread about the game when these kind of threads, set up by brooksie, with the same right wing bs don't ever get locked and hes allowed to roam free.


How is it BS and right wing? anyone could fight for their' country, a lefty could fight for their' country, a righty could fight for their' country, anyone could, if it's so annoying don't comment on it?! just let it die!


Its not necessary this thread I'm referring to, there are numerous similar ones you've set up all based around issues like undying loyalty to country, closing down on immigration, sensitive issues like political correctness.


well i dont go to into it and if there's a poll i put options so everyone can have there say
User avatar
Corporal brooksieb
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:44 pm

Postby Fruitcake on Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:10 pm

nagerous wrote
sensitive issues like political correctness.


Now there is a self fulfilling statement.
Image

Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
User avatar
Colonel Fruitcake
 
Posts: 2194
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:38 am

Postby ignotus on Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:12 pm

suggs wrote:
greenoaks wrote:will random.org be used to decide who wins the battles ?


How do you think we won WWII?
WE had ludicrous dice from 1943 onwards.


Yep, and Hitler made a bad fort in Dunquerke (freestyle) and used all his cards bad at eastern front! :lol:
User avatar
Lieutenant ignotus
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.

Postby brooksieb on Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:18 pm

Fruitcake wrote:nagerous wrote
sensitive issues like political correctness.


Now there is a self fulfilling statement.


yer not sensitive for all
User avatar
Corporal brooksieb
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:44 pm

Postby Fruitcake on Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:34 pm

My point exactly brooksieb.
Image

Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
User avatar
Colonel Fruitcake
 
Posts: 2194
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:38 am

Postby greenoaks on Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:37 am

suggs wrote:
greenoaks wrote:will random.org be used to decide who wins the battles ?


How do you think we won WWII?
WE had ludicrous dice from 1943 onwards.

i heard hitler had problems defeating the ones in russia
User avatar
Sergeant greenoaks
 
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Postby greenoaks on Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:38 am

suggs wrote:
greenoaks wrote:will random.org be used to decide who wins the battles ?


How do you think we won WWII?
WE had ludicrous dice from 1943 onwards.

i heard hitler had problems defeating the ones in russia
User avatar
Sergeant greenoaks
 
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Postby greenoaks on Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:39 am

ignotus wrote:
suggs wrote:
greenoaks wrote:will random.org be used to decide who wins the battles ?


How do you think we won WWII?
WE had ludicrous dice from 1943 onwards.


Yep, and Hitler made a bad fort in Dunquerke (freestyle) and used all his cards bad at eastern front! :lol:

i heard hitler had problems defeating the ones in russia
User avatar
Sergeant greenoaks
 
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Postby strike wolf on Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:40 am

I'd try to help. Mainly through quick attacks with a minimum risk of death.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
User avatar
Cadet strike wolf
 
Posts: 8345
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)

Postby Jenos Ridan on Sat Mar 01, 2008 2:05 am

ignotus wrote:
Solution is better educational programs and gun-free society (at the end).



Sure, Hitler.
"There is only one road to peace, and that is to conquer"-Hunter Clark

"Give a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life"- Something Hunter would say
User avatar
Private Jenos Ridan
 
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Hanger 18

Postby Skittles! on Sat Mar 01, 2008 2:39 am

Jenos Ridan wrote:
ignotus wrote:
Solution is better educational programs and gun-free society (at the end).



Sure, Hitler.

:lol: :lol:

That is funny. Let's keep everyone stupid, and let them have guns, and then we'll have full control of the world!
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14575
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby DaGip on Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:53 am

brooksieb wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:I would protect my home and family from any enemy, foreign or domestic. Would I join the military, though? Hell no.


Well if you join the army you could get better weapons incase that happened.


Like this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFBY_xHfoBo
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby Iliad on Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:55 am

Iz Man wrote:
ignotus wrote:
Iz Man wrote:Problem: Thug attempts to commit armed robbery and/or murder and/or rape.

Thug shot dead.

Problem solved.

But we digress.....would I fight for my country? Yes, I have, and would again.


So how did robber came in possession of a gun?
Gun is a problem of your story and second gun is the solution?
Solution is better educational programs and gun-free society (at the end).

Gun can't do a good thing because his main purpose is to kill.
He was armed with a sword
okay so you are advocating a pro-gun society but all the thugs being the honourable men they are will rob with swords. And of course shooting the thug is the best solution instead of say trying to make him be a a part of the society again
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Postby Hologram on Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:41 pm

Damn right I will.

Semper fi, do or die.
The inflation rate in Zimbabwe just hit 4 million percent. Some people say it is only 165,000, but they are just being stupid. -Scott Adams, artist and writer of Dilbert
User avatar
Cook Hologram
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Armpit of America

Postby Jenos Ridan on Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:35 am

Skittles! wrote:
Jenos Ridan wrote:
ignotus wrote:
Solution is better educational programs and gun-free society (at the end).



Sure, Hitler.

:lol: :lol:

That is funny. Let's keep everyone stupid, and let them have guns, and then we'll have full control of the world!


Don't tell me some skull-drudgery about how egalitarian Hitler was; he thought strict governmental controls on guns and massive propaganda programs, some of which were passed off as education in the kindergardens, would result in his Aryan Utopia. And most anti-gun types, either knowingly but ignoring the facts (not a first) or unwittingly, support a governmental policy that Hitler practiced. Delete the Second Amendment and what stops Big Brother from taking away other freedoms? Nothing; their is no rational reason for a government to maintain civil liberties once the citizen's right to rebel is removed.

Keep people stupid, hardly. If anything, the US needs a major education reform. But nobody is really serious about making real changes, because nobody knows what is even wrong in the first place. I honestly thing that the Brits, Germans and the Japanese have a better lay-out, separate the college-bound kids from the ones who would be better served with some sort of vocational training and educate along those two tracts. But we don't do that here and for no good reason. Watch, some hollow-head is going to defend the failing state of affairs with cries of "more money." That's the last thing you do; when you have an open, bleeding wound, the last thing you give the patient is blood thiners. If you do, they'll bleed out faster and die. If you simply throw money at a problem, it only creates more mess to clean up. While I'm on the rant, Keysian Economics do not work in times when the economy is relatively stable, all this pointless deficit spending must stop because their is no need for it. But the mass of sheeple don't see, the entrenched buereaucrats in DC refuse to see the truth that stares them square in the face, the Politicians are clueless about what exactly the problem is and those who see the bleedin' forest for the bleedin' trees are marked as some sort of fringe lunatic.

..................

Thanks for inspirering a massive rant.
"There is only one road to peace, and that is to conquer"-Hunter Clark

"Give a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life"- Something Hunter would say
User avatar
Private Jenos Ridan
 
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Hanger 18

Postby Frigidus on Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:38 am

Jenos Ridan wrote:
Skittles! wrote:
Jenos Ridan wrote:
ignotus wrote:
Solution is better educational programs and gun-free society (at the end).



Sure, Hitler.

:lol: :lol:

That is funny. Let's keep everyone stupid, and let them have guns, and then we'll have full control of the world!


Don't tell me some skull-drudgery about how egalitarian Hitler was; he thought strict governmental controls on guns and massive propaganda programs, some of which were passed off as education in the kindergardens, would result in his Aryan Utopia. And most anti-gun types, either knowingly but ignoring the facts (not a first) or unwittingly, support a governmental policy that Hitler practiced. Delete the Second Amendment and what stops Big Brother from taking away other freedoms? Nothing; their is no rational reason for a government to maintain civil liberties once the citizen's right to rebel is removed.


Aside from clearcut Godwin's Law violations, Hitler had many different government and economic politics, some of them effective ones. We can't just ignore a policy because some toolbox used it. Let's say he had supported gun freedom should we have said "Oh no guys, Hitler was a gun nut, let's ban them?
User avatar
Sergeant Frigidus
 
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Postby Jenos Ridan on Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:53 am

Frigidus wrote:
Aside from clearcut Godwin's Law violations, Hitler had many different government and economic politics, some of them effective ones. We can't just ignore a policy because some toolbox used it. Let's say he had supported gun freedom should we have said "Oh no guys, Hitler was a gun nut, let's ban them?


Effective, I agree. Six million dead Jews can't all be wrong. That's just in Jews, add the millions more who died in places like Dachau and Aushwitz. Add still many more millions who died fighting the Wehrmacht from 1939 to 1945. Oh yes, he was a very effective leader.

So, yeah, we can ignore a policy on the grounds of it's intended use. Hitler used gun control to further his control of the German people and the peoples of Europe in the nations he conquered; What assurance do I have that the government would not, shortly after seizing all guns or at least radically limiting them, then decide elections and independant press are too much of a burden? None, that's what.
"There is only one road to peace, and that is to conquer"-Hunter Clark

"Give a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life"- Something Hunter would say
User avatar
Private Jenos Ridan
 
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Hanger 18

Postby radiojake on Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:07 am

Jenos Ridan wrote: Delete the Second Amendment and what stops Big Brother from taking away other freedoms? Nothing; their is no rational reason for a government to maintain civil liberties once the citizen's right to rebel is removed.



Don't need guns to start a rebellion
-- share what ya got --
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class radiojake
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Postby Jenos Ridan on Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:15 am

radiojake wrote:
Jenos Ridan wrote: Delete the Second Amendment and what stops Big Brother from taking away other freedoms? Nothing; their is no rational reason for a government to maintain civil liberties once the citizen's right to rebel is removed.



Don't need guns to start a rebellion


Try it. I'd love to see the results.

Might not need them to start one, but how exactly do you plan on winning one? One of the major things the men and women of the Revolution regularly raided from Hessian and British camps were arms and munitions, example; the attack on Fort Ticonderoga. If the rebels of a modern-era Revolution do not have arms, they will be crushed in the blink of an eye.
"There is only one road to peace, and that is to conquer"-Hunter Clark

"Give a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life"- Something Hunter would say
User avatar
Private Jenos Ridan
 
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Hanger 18

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap