Conquer Club

account sitting issues..new rule? <updated - see 1st post>

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Babysitting Rule 1st poll

Poll ended at Sun May 18, 2008 10:15 am

 
Total votes : 0

account sitting issues..new rule? <updated - see 1st post>

Postby lord voldemort on Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:55 am

yo i need some serious answers so owen nothing to smart arse like unless its really funny
if i log in at say 8 am and i have approx 25 or so games to take turns in right
all of them would expire at about 7 pm
but here is the deal right this day i will be out from 830 am until well past midnight where i get home i will be absolutely screwed and the last thing i wanna do is go on cc. if me finding a baby sitter or 2 cause of games involved in etc to take my turns but they take them during the day not before the get close to expiring is this in violation of baby sitting rules not that there are any official rules...
Click image to enlarge.
image


but anyway what is your opinion on this?
====
An Idea donated by Yeti_c

a) Teams, Freestyle without Babysitter.
b) Teams, Freestyle with Babysitter.
c) Teams, Sequential without Babysitter.
d) Teams, Sequential with Babysitter.
e) Teams with Babysitter on opposing teams.

So this means we need a rule for the following...

a) Babysitting for people you are playing against. (This already exists)
b) Babysitting Freestyle Team games. (How do we define this without stopping the actual fair use of freestyle babysitters?)

<update>
This issue has been put on hold until propper features can be put in place to manage account sitting properly.

We updated FAQ 15 slightly to reflect and clarify the current rules more clearly:

FAQ 15 wrote:You can, with the stipulation that the account babysitter is not your opponent in any current game and does not start or join new games (except for ongoing tournaments). It is common courtesy to announce in game chat that another player will take your turn(s) during your absence. Furthermore, you should only take another player's turn if they are in danger of missing a turn, not for the purpose of gaining a tactical advantage.

(emphasis added)

This is not a departure from what was true before, it simply makes tactical account sitting a clearly punishable action (which is always has been in practice)

Have a good one
Twill
Last edited by lord voldemort on Wed May 07, 2008 6:26 pm, edited 9 times in total.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: general opinion

Postby wacicha on Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:18 am

nothing wrong with it. Owen might even sit the account for you!!! He is not always a smart --- well mostly he is but he --- (getting teary eyed laughing so hard)
Image
User avatar
Major wacicha
 
Posts: 3988
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:51 pm

Re: general opinion

Postby lord voldemort on Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:32 am

ok thanks....i got an official warning for this...
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: general opinion

Postby wacicha on Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:36 am

how was the wording of the warning done.

Another words what was the warning really about
Image
User avatar
Major wacicha
 
Posts: 3988
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:51 pm

Re: general opinion

Postby lord voldemort on Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:39 am

in the situation described as above. i had 2 people take my turns. one person was a teammate in freestyle team games.
the other just a clan mate to take some turns
i asked them to make sure team games were done cause they were the most important. (you can make up singles position) but team games is harder.
so they took the turns and i got a warnign for strategic babysitting
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: general opinion

Postby wacicha on Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:46 am

Thank you sir

Let me do some research on this. If you could send me a copy of the warning I would appreciate it.

I will look into it and get an answer I am happy with.
Image
User avatar
Major wacicha
 
Posts: 3988
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:51 pm

Re: general opinion

Postby CYCLOPS1 on Sat Apr 26, 2008 11:09 am

i dont see what youre going on about its just a warning why do you have to right so much just about something so small :?
User avatar
Cadet CYCLOPS1
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:44 pm

Re: general opinion

Postby lord voldemort on Sat Apr 26, 2008 11:26 am

CYCLOPS1 wrote:i dont see what youre going on about its just a warning why do you have to right so much just about something so small :?

a i got a neg for it
b it looks bad like im cheating and im not cheating
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: general opinion

Postby Kemmler on Sat Apr 26, 2008 11:29 am

lord voldemort wrote:
CYCLOPS1 wrote:i dont see what youre going on about its just a warning why do you have to right so much just about something so small :?

a i got a neg for it
b it looks bad like im cheating and im not cheating


Haha lol I should go posting that comment on everyone's profiles... it does look pretty bad
User avatar
Cook Kemmler
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:03 pm
Location: GOODBYE CC

Re: general opinion

Postby owenshooter on Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:06 pm

can you put up the official warning and who it is from? maybe even a game number...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class owenshooter
 
Posts: 13265
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: general opinion

Postby lord voldemort on Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:11 pm

owenshooter wrote:can you put up the official warning and who it is from? maybe even a game number...-0

i dont want this getting out as such like parties involved etc. check your inbox owen
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: general opinion

Postby wacicha on Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:13 pm

It is from the CC Staff And it states it is for Stratigic babysitting.

Presumable because he had babysitters because of freestyle -- but also logged in during the 24 hr period when babysitters logged in.

For causal games I can kinda understand, but for freestyle you need sometimes have a game watched for more often during a 24 than a causel
Image
User avatar
Major wacicha
 
Posts: 3988
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:51 pm

Re: general opinion

Postby owenshooter on Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:44 pm

yeah, i read it, and i completely disagree with the warning... i think you can post the official warning if you remove the mod, and it shouldn't be a problem. in a team game, essentially any good team will gain a strategical advantage with every turn taken, right? i think this really needs to be clarified for team games. and possibly different rules for sequential and freestyle... i can't even see the advantage in a freestyle game... if someone tried that in a freestyle game against my teams, it just wouldn't work, because we co-ordinate to take our turns when the other team is off the site, and while we are all in real time communication and ready to blast off a turn (another reason i don't like freestyle. even when you play within the rules, a win can feel oh so dirty!). if this warning is correct, and the 24 hour rule is in effect for team games, i can name more than a few dozen teams that are "cheaters" that i would consider good team players. this should really be looked at and an official ruling made... it is VERY INTERESTING!-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class owenshooter
 
Posts: 13265
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: general opinion

Postby owenshooter on Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:45 pm

CYCLOPS1 wrote:i dont see what youre going on about its just a warning why do you have to right so much just about something so small :?

this is HUGE... it is pretty much a basic aspect of team play in many occasions!-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class owenshooter
 
Posts: 13265
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: general opinion

Postby wicked on Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:58 pm

owenshooter wrote: if this warning is correct, and the 24 hour rule is in effect for team games, i can name more than a few dozen teams that are "cheaters" that i would consider good team players. this should really be looked at and an official ruling made... it is VERY INTERESTING!-0


It was looked into, and a ruling was made. And just because it came from me, doesn't mean it was just my decision. It was posted for discussion in the mod forum and the result was the warnings sent. If you logged on for 30 minutes and didn't want to take your turns then and didn't want to take them later, that's not our fault, but it's also not a legit reason for a babysitter. The babysitting rule has always been very clearly explained... you're allowed this privilege when you cannot access your computer for a 24 hour period. This is the same for all game types. This has always been the rule. If people have taken to breaking this rule out of convenience, then obviously we need to write it down on the "official" page since before we've just relied on people using common sense and asking in the forums.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Re: general opinion

Postby owenshooter on Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:31 pm

wicked wrote:It was looked into, and a ruling was made. And just because it came from me, doesn't mean it was just my decision. It was posted for discussion in the mod forum and the result was the warnings sent.

wow... just a little defensive here? did i mention your name in the thread, even though i received it? nope... i for one have received "an official warning" from you, which was deemed unofficial and "user to user", so you can understand my hesitation in the outcome of the process... no offense intended, just stating a fact. furthermore, i know you are a mod, and i know you work hard on the site, i just tend to follow the letter of the law in the written rules and official rulings from andy or twill... and this ruling is so counter to how the actual world of doubles works, in my experience, that is truly interesting!
wicked wrote:you're allowed this privilege when you cannot access your computer for a 24 hour period. This is the same for all game types. This has always been the rule.If people have taken to breaking this rule out of convenience, then obviously we need to write it down on the "official" page since before we've just relied on people using common sense and asking in the forums.

well, i have 413 team games to your 81, and would venture to guess that i may have some valid input as to how the team games are truly played on this site (that is just using my common sense). maybe you should all seek input from guys that have over 1,000 to 3,000 team games completed, perhaps they should be asked their opinion on this ruling, since they may have a better insight into the matter than either of us... and yes, perhaps it does need to be written down...-0

p.s.-my post wasn't an attack on you, it was a question as to the validity of the ruling, because it is truly counter to what goes on in the world of team games.
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class owenshooter
 
Posts: 13265
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: general opinion

Postby Kemmler on Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:41 pm

Ask me, I know everything
User avatar
Cook Kemmler
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:03 pm
Location: GOODBYE CC

Re: general opinion

Postby wicked on Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:48 pm

Not defensvie at all, just explaining what happened. Coordinating turns is fine for team games, it's how they should be played, as long as everyone is playing their own account. However, taking another person's turns in teams games when they're just not around for a few hours is a clear violation of the babysitting rule, which we're in the process of writing out. If that's how you've been playing team games, then I'm sorry to say you're in the wrong.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Re: general opinion

Postby owenshooter on Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:18 pm

wicked wrote: If that's how you've been playing team games, then I'm sorry to say you're in the wrong.

nope, i'm just saying you are pretty out of touch with how team games generally work... but, then again, you have 80 something team games, so i wouldn't expect you to have a very solid insight into the world of team games. it will be nice to have it in the official rules, to clear it all up...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class owenshooter
 
Posts: 13265
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: general opinion

Postby lord voldemort on Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:01 pm

wicked wrote:
owenshooter wrote: if this warning is correct, and the 24 hour rule is in effect for team games, i can name more than a few dozen teams that are "cheaters" that i would consider good team players. this should really be looked at and an official ruling made... it is VERY INTERESTING!-0


It was looked into, and a ruling was made. And just because it came from me, doesn't mean it was just my decision. It was posted for discussion in the mod forum and the result was the warnings sent. If you logged on for 30 minutes and didn't want to take your turns then and didn't want to take them later, that's not our fault, but it's also not a legit reason for a babysitter. The babysitting rule has always been very clearly explained... you're allowed this privilege when you cannot access your computer for a 24 hour period. This is the same for all game types. This has always been the rule. If people have taken to breaking this rule out of convenience, then obviously we need to write it down on the "official" page since before we've just relied on people using common sense and asking in the forums.

as i have stated to u i logged in briefly to tell people oh i cant take my turns can you. the whole day i wasnt online. like i said to you already you dont look at it case by case in which you should have done

freestyle team games are much different than all games wicked. like owen said. i missed turn is extremely difficult to make up.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: general opinion

Postby owenshooter on Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:21 pm

like i said before, someone with 81 games under her belt may not truly have a grasp of what it is you did or what goes on in the team game world. i think if they are going to really make a rule change, they should ask some of the heavy hitters of the doubles community (not myself by any stretch of the imagination), what they think of whatever rules it is they are going to rewrite.

all i can see is, you popped in to find a babysitter for over 40 games, so you wouldn't miss, found one, left... then you are accused of cheating because you signed in earlier in the day. funny, i will sign in on days when i am booked for a job and know i will miss a few turns, around 5 or 6am to PM the few people that have access to my password to ask them to cover my turns for me so i don't miss... sure, i'll take turns in a few of the games that are close to misses, but then i'm gone, and my account is in someone elses hands. so, if i then sign in at 10pm that night to take a turn in a doubles game with one of them, i have broken the rules? makes no sense. none at all. sooo, the solution is to not sign into CC to check the status of your games before searching for someone to sit for you?

i can see the allegations of cheating in a freestyle game, but not for a standard game... i know wicked has layed the rule out, but again, she isn't a regular doubles player and i just don't think she gets it. just like there is NO way i would roll into the world of freestyle 8 player games and try to determine if/how rules were being broken, because i have NO IDEA!!! i don't play it, i don't get it, i have nothing to say about it! i would ask OTHER PEOPLE that play that setting the most, respected players, for their opinion. not just rely on interpreting a rule that is obviously flawed and not very applicable to the way that team games truly work.

sooo, i look forward to a rewrite, but i also hope they ask some of the more prominent team players for their input. seems only fair... especially after i had to suffer through that classic ordeal with the ridiculous revote!!!-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class owenshooter
 
Posts: 13265
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: general opinion

Postby wicked on Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:54 pm

owenshooter wrote:
wicked wrote: If that's how you've been playing team games, then I'm sorry to say you're in the wrong.

nope, i'm just saying you are pretty out of touch with how team games generally work... but, then again, you have 80 something team games, so i wouldn't expect you to have a very solid insight into the world of team games. it will be nice to have it in the official rules, to clear it all up...-0


Owen, I'm not sure where you get the idea that rules are set by how the games are being played. Rules are set by the staff here, not by the players. Yes, players can suggest rule changes, but they can't just decide to start breaking them because they feel like it and that how they think it should be. It doesn't matter how many team games I've played. I'm stating what the rule IS, not what I think it should be, but what it IS. If you guys want to change it, then feel free to fill out a suggestion form. Joining a team game shouldn't be an invitation to have free access to your teammates' accounts to take turns whenver you see fit. If people have been doing this, then yes that's wrong, and against the babysitting rule and harboring on multiple accounts. Babysitting is for vacations and such, not just when someone's busy for the day. But don't worry, we'll clear it all up.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Re: general opinion

Postby lord voldemort on Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:59 pm

wicked wrote:
owenshooter wrote:
wicked wrote: If that's how you've been playing team games, then I'm sorry to say you're in the wrong.

nope, i'm just saying you are pretty out of touch with how team games generally work... but, then again, you have 80 something team games, so i wouldn't expect you to have a very solid insight into the world of team games. it will be nice to have it in the official rules, to clear it all up...-0


Owen, it doesn't matter how many team games I've played. I'm stating what the rule IS, not what I think it should be, but what it IS. If you guys want to change it, then feel free to fill out a suggestion form. Joining a team game shouldn't be an invitation to have free access to your teammates' accounts to take turns whenver you see fit. If people have been doing this, then yes that's wrong, and against the babysitting rule and harboring on multiple accounts. Babysitting is for vacations and such, not just when someone's busy for the day. But don't worry, we'll clear it all up.

show me where on this website it shows this rule that says this
let me get this strait because im busy for a day but im not on vacation i can have a baby sitter. that is bullshit and you know it wicked. what if i was busy with a family death, would i not be entitled to a baby sitter then, sure i was honest with you saying i was at a music concert all day. but still.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: general opinion

Postby lord voldemort on Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:00 pm

and my teammates dont have free access to my account...there is this lil invention called msn. and skype or even more recent a mobile phone...
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant lord voldemort
 
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Launceston, Australia

Re: general opinion

Postby wicked on Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:02 pm

This rule has been clarified time and time again whenever asked on the forums by the staff here. It has always been the same. As of now, it falls under the "unwritten rule" category, but we're working on writing something down, as we didn't realize there was such flagrant disregard for this rule.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Next

Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users