Moderator: Community Team






















jonesthecurl wrote:They said "ouch". It was an iron bar.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.



tzor wrote:Personally I find it disgusting and not particularly funny.






















Only the wise can see the emperor's beautiful new suit.t-o-m wrote:tzor wrote:Personally I find it disgusting and not particularly funny.
exactly,
whats funny about a kid being molestered and chimotheropy?

t-o-m wrote:tzor wrote:Personally I find it disgusting and not particularly funny.
exactly,
whats funny about a kid being molestered and chimotheropy?





Frigidus wrote:t-o-m wrote:tzor wrote:Personally I find it disgusting and not particularly funny.
exactly,
whats funny about a kid being molestered and chimotheropy?
Well, I think the funniest part was when the bartender beat the shit out of the mom. The fact that he molested a little girl afterwards only accentuates this humor. I'd say that someone needs to step up and finish this story. It may very well be the greatest literary achievement of all time.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.










Frigidus wrote:Well, I think the funniest part was when the bartender beat the shit out of the mom. The fact that he molested a little girl afterwards only accentuates this humor. I'd say that someone needs to step up and finish this story. It may very well be the greatest literary achievement of all time.



















tzor wrote:That's actually the least unfunny part of the whole plot. You start off with a mother, who apparently is in the bar because one of her kids (gender not known) who suffers from cancer has to urinate. Now she has already walked into the bar with her kids in tow because of this fact yet when the kid mentions the obvious (implied for the second time since that's the explicit reason why she came in ... she didn't want a drink) she attacks the child.
The Bartender uses this as an excuse to commit brutal assault.
The child molestation is a gratutitous insult to the injury. More to the point it doesn't fit within the context ...
The fact that the title says "two kids" mentions "one of the kids" and then again "one of the kids" is an insult to ordinal numbers everywhere. There are only two kids; there is the one and there is the other. So once you mentioned the one kid with the cancer problem and the need to urinate, there is either that kid or the other.




















t-o-m wrote:tzor wrote:That's actually the least unfunny part of the whole plot. You start off with a mother, who apparently is in the bar because one of her kids (gender not known) who suffers from cancer has to urinate. Now she has already walked into the bar with her kids in tow because of this fact yet when the kid mentions the obvious (implied for the second time since that's the explicit reason why she came in ... she didn't want a drink) she attacks the child.
The Bartender uses this as an excuse to commit brutal assault.
The child molestation is a gratutitous insult to the injury. More to the point it doesn't fit within the context ...
The fact that the title says "two kids" mentions "one of the kids" and then again "one of the kids" is an insult to ordinal numbers everywhere. There are only two kids; there is the one and there is the other. So once you mentioned the one kid with the cancer problem and the need to urinate, there is either that kid or the other.
spot on me thinks
-
i gotta really good joke!:
knock, knock!
whos there?
boo
boo who?
stop crying its only a joke!
-
wasnt that a treat!





Frigidus wrote:t-o-m wrote:tzor wrote:That's actually the least unfunny part of the whole plot. You start off with a mother, who apparently is in the bar because one of her kids (gender not known) who suffers from cancer has to urinate. Now she has already walked into the bar with her kids in tow because of this fact yet when the kid mentions the obvious (implied for the second time since that's the explicit reason why she came in ... she didn't want a drink) she attacks the child.
The Bartender uses this as an excuse to commit brutal assault.
The child molestation is a gratutitous insult to the injury. More to the point it doesn't fit within the context ...
The fact that the title says "two kids" mentions "one of the kids" and then again "one of the kids" is an insult to ordinal numbers everywhere. There are only two kids; there is the one and there is the other. So once you mentioned the one kid with the cancer problem and the need to urinate, there is either that kid or the other.
spot on me thinks
-
i gotta really good joke!:
knock, knock!
whos there?
boo
boo who?
stop crying its only a joke!
-
wasnt that a treat!
It could have used more molestation.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.










Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.

Dancing Mustard wrote:I thought it was "what's the best thing about having sex with thirty nine year olds?"...
Might just be me though.









saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.










Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.

MeDeFe wrote:You mean something like this:
knock knock!
who's there?
a mole
a mole who?
a molester of children!





















Spuzzell wrote:Fantastic thread.
A nigger, a jew and a spic walk into a bar. The barman says, "Get the f*ck out."
[the above joke uses racism for comic effect. If that offends you, don't read it.]
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...







Pedronicus wrote:Two OAPs were visiting an art gallery for their day out. They come upon this large painting of what seems to be 3 naked black men sitting on a park bench, but the one in the middle has a pink penis. The 2 oldie goldies study this artwork for some time but still cannot fathom the meaning of the picture. Finally they spot the gallery curator and ask him to explain what the picture really signifies. The curator rather pompously explains at length that it's the latest artwork of a Scottish artist and the pink penis signifies the emasculation of the black race through it's history of oppression from European colonialists etc. etc. etc.
After a long and patronising lecture the curator leaves them, but the 2 pensioners are still staring at the painting with a bewildered expression when they are approached by a man who has overheard the explaination by the curator.
"Do ye want to know what it really means"
"And how would you know what this means?" they ask.
"I'm the man who created this piece of art" he says with a pronounced Scottish accent.
"You see," he continued " it's really quite simple, all it shows is 3 Scottish coal miners sitting on a bench for a break and the one in the middle popped home for his lunch."
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...







Users browsing this forum: No registered users