Is this Cheating?

by **wicked** on Sun May 25, 2008 7:32 pm

And for the record, I very much agree with the proposed change (i.e. just b/c I tell ya the rules, doesn't mean I agree with them). So sorry guys, no fighting here.

Twill can't even smack a flea...

by **owenshooter** on Sun May 25, 2008 7:42 pm

wicked wrote:Twill can't even smack a flea...

now, if i were to mention a mod or admins anatomy in an obvious penis joke, i would
receive a formal warning... sigh...-0

p.s.-i eagerly await the rule change.

by **Hrvat** on Sun May 25, 2008 7:47 pm

Twill wrote:I love how I get a couple IM's when someone calls me out.
Rule 2: NO Secret Diplomacy

Any and every form of diplomatic talk between players should be open and posted in game chat in a language that all players in game understand. This includes (but is not limited to) Alliances, attack coordinations, truces etc.

Thank you.

by **Thezzaruz** on Mon May 26, 2008 3:06 am

wicked wrote:Hate to dissapoint ya Thezz, but there's no in-house fighting.

Darn. I was picturing a meet-up with sumo suites, lots of trash talk and some big ol' foam hands thrown in for good measure.......

by **wicked** on Mon May 26, 2008 8:42 am

Thezzaruz wrote:
wicked wrote:Hate to dissapoint ya Thezz, but there's no in-house fighting.

Darn. I was picturing a meet-up with sumo suites, lots of trash talk and some big ol' foam hands thrown in for good measure.......

well damn, now that you mention it, that does sound fun. :twisted:

by **cena-rules** on Mon May 26, 2008 8:48 am

wicked wrote:
Thezzaruz wrote:
wicked wrote:Hate to dissapoint ya Thezz, but there's no in-house fighting.

Darn. I was picturing a meet-up with sumo suites, lots of trash talk and some big ol' foam hands thrown in for good measure.......

well damn, now that you mention it, that does sound fun.

dont go off topic wicked

by **lord voldemort** on Mon May 26, 2008 8:56 am

Twill wrote:And I hate to disappoint ya owen, but you only wish I was a member of BpB, secret or not

dont lie

by **owenshooter** on Mon May 26, 2008 10:57 am

lord voldemort wrote:
Twill wrote:And I hate to disappoint ya owen, but you only wish I was a member of BpB, secret or not

dont lie

*says twill as he once again plows through the BpB forums hoping his application has been approved*

by **Twill** on Mon May 26, 2008 11:42 am

Alright folks, keep it on topic. My smacking abilities and sumo suits (that does sound like fun) are not up for debate here

If ya dont have something to say on the rule clarification, don't say it here

have a good one

Twill

by **Yvgni** on Wed May 28, 2008 2:08 pm

Rule 2: NO Secret Diplomacy

Any and every form of diplomatic talk between players should be open and posted in game chat in a language that all players in game understand. This includes (but is not limited to) Alliances, attack coordinations, truces etc.

I just started here, and already this rule looks like a vast improvement to me.

(the above is only the opinion of the writer and is therefore not valid in the continental united states unless accompanied by a notarized document in triplicate which absolves the writer from any responsibility whatsoever, not void where prohibited, cave canem, sic post hoc in absurdum non compos mentos, etc.)

by **Soloman** on Wed May 28, 2008 2:35 pm

great correction I think it was needed... =D>

by **gloryordeath** on Wed May 28, 2008 7:59 pm

I live for this rule really I think all alliances suck thats what team games are for. But some like them and thats fine. I can't wait till this rule comes into effect. I might even play more public games. =D>

by **wacicha** on Wed May 28, 2008 8:11 pm

Herakilla wrote:all alliances have to be made publicly but the details of which can be secret between the members

thats my thoughts and i am very opposed to any sort of alliance in a standard game barring the fact that there is a clear game leader who would automatically win unless every1 teams up on him/her

Xi members are Not allowed to alliance at anytime. makes for a better game.

by **hwhrhett** on Thu May 29, 2008 12:35 pm

wacicha wrote:
Herakilla wrote:all alliances have to be made publicly but the details of which can be secret between the members

thats my thoughts and i am very opposed to any sort of alliance in a standard game barring the fact that there is a clear game leader who would automatically win unless every1 teams up on him/her

Xi members are Not allowed to alliance at anytime. makes for a better game.

i dont think ive ever seen a decent player have an alliance except for in tournaments, or battle royales. alliances are a crutch for the weak

by **Riazor** on Thu May 29, 2008 1:29 pm

hwhrhett wrote:
wacicha wrote:
Herakilla wrote:all alliances have to be made publicly but the details of which can be secret between the members

thats my thoughts and i am very opposed to any sort of alliance in a standard game barring the fact that there is a clear game leader who would automatically win unless every1 teams up on him/her

Xi members are Not allowed to alliance at anytime. makes for a better game.

i dont think ive ever seen a decent player have an alliance except for in tournaments, or battle royales. alliances are a crutch for the weak

Wrong, you made an alliance with me in the game that just finished. We agreed about ganging up against team 2 in our doubles game! (and no we are not weak :mrgreen: