
--Andy
Moderator: Community Team
AndyDufresne wrote:It may be going no where, but is amusing to read from a spectator's eye. This thread is one of the few fixtures in the Off Topics.
--Andy
Jargo The Axe wrote:What proves that God does not exist?
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:First off put aside any bias that you may have...weather it be religious or anti-religious.
Now science has said, Life cannot come from non-life. Which is common sense... a rock will never reproduce since it is not living. A lie
Then you trace back all life to its orgin...the very first living thing.
Where did it come from? Illogical and Irrelevant
The ONLY answer is someting or someone has always existed. And that someone or something must have the power to create (or reproduce). A lie
There must be a God. A lie
Science also dictates evolution could never have happened A lie(but lets save that for a later thread).
mightyal wrote:That post proved that you are an accomplished liar/fantasist and nothing else.
It was more the 'science has said, Life cannot come from non-life' guff that I was referring to.vtmarik wrote:mightyal wrote:That post proved that you are an accomplished liar/fantasist and nothing else.
I don't think that he lied about rock reproduction...
Paulicus wrote:But science has said that they suspect life was created in a big pool of acids and chemicals, over millions of years... they use other science, and evindence, and speculation to say this... kind of like the evidance for God... some circumstance, unexplained healings, the fact that so many people believe in God, and others.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
GandalftheWhite wrote:i will write my argument over the week and post it as it is fairly long and i don't have it written on the computer currently.
pikmin wrote:thats a period not a decmil point and Show me the logic that god exists and ill prove you long.
Also what happened to jay?
darvlay wrote:Get over it, people. It's just a crazy lookin' bear ejaculating into the waiting maw of an eager fox. Nothing more.
jay_a2j wrote:I don't remember the scientists name but I recall my 7th grade science teacher writting "Life can not come from non-life" on the blackboard, followed by the name of the person who said it. This was in the mid 80's, so it is possible that science has gotten life from a rock since then.
mr. incrediball wrote:and jay has been constantly showing us the logic, but logic means nothing.
pikmin wrote:this debate is useless. Every time someone proves god does or doesn't exist someone will prove him/her wrong.
Its like trying to figure out witch came first the egg or the chicken.
YOU WILL NEVER KNOW
vtmarik wrote:pikmin wrote:this debate is useless. Every time someone proves god does or doesn't exist someone will prove him/her wrong.
Its like trying to figure out witch came first the egg or the chicken.
YOU WILL NEVER KNOW
Well, if Darwin's right two animals who had genetic similarities to the chicken mated and their DNA combined into the first chicken.
So the answer is the Egg!
Source: Broken Saints.
The great scientist Louis Pasteur realized the futility of spontaneous generation. Francesco Redi had demonstrated long before that flies didn't 'arise' from decaying meat but from the eggs that other flies laid on the meat! Pasteur definitively showed that microbes did not arise in a sterile meat broth until and unless other microbes had access to it. He and the great pathologist Rudolf Virchow formulated what later became known as the biogenetic law: Life comes only from life. The implication of this research was that life does not create itself, it required God to create it originally. Both of these Christian men of science were creationists.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
What Louis Pasteur and the others who denied spontaneous generation demonstrated is that life does not currently spontaneously arise in complex form from nonlife in nature; he did not demonstrate the impossibility of life arising in simple form from nonlife by way of a long and propitious series of chemical steps/selections. In particular, they did not show that life cannot arise once, and then evolve. Neither Pasteur, nor any other post-Darwin researcher in this field, denied the age of the earth or the fact of evolution.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users