KoE_Sirius wrote:Soloman wrote:There will always be some dissent but this is a far better Idea the foe list should be used equally and if you do not want to play a person enough to foe them then you should not be able to join or have them join your games...Thezzaruz wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:I could see if, instead of having someone's name removed from the foe list automatically if they join a game with a foe, making it so that you CANNOT join the games of anybody you have foed, EXCEPT in tournaments (this would be an automatic program override -- if the game type is "tournament" foe lists will not be honored -- and everyone should know this in advance).
That seems more in line that requiring that a name be removed. I WOULD support that change.
I agree, this would be a better change. Only problem is that most of those opposing the OPs idea has been opposed to this too (both in this and other threads).![]()
And yea, tournament and battle royal games should override any foe-list ofc.
This won't help to revive the speed/freestyle game though.It really is a stuggle to get a game started in the evening.Its rife with players who think the ignore list is some kind of revenge.As far as I am aware I personally am on 3 ppls lists.One of these players has a Foe list longer then WAR and PEACE and would not even notice if he joined a foes game and one of the foe was removed.
Lets try and stay on subject guys..I'm not interested in your idea in my thread..Make your own thread and I'll view it with an open mind.
Thx
We are on subject we are discussing changes to the foe list that should be made. Just because your primary idea has been mostly rejected does not mean the continued discussion of changes to the Foe list in different ways is off topic. In fact it is the next logical step to discuss realistic remedies for the disparity. As far as the speed freestyle create your own games problem solved...