because i'm an aussieNatNat wrote:why didn't u do london metro
Moderator: Cartographers
because i'm an aussieNatNat wrote:why didn't u do london metro

That's correctGilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?

Nicedanfrank wrote:This map is cool and plays great ... a well balanced game in four player sequential where best strategy wins over.. Great Job!!!!

How come Northbridge can't attack Nth Sydney?cairnswk wrote:That's correctGilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?

Ah Gilligan, because it is designed that wayGilligan wrote:How come Northbridge can't attack Nth Sydney?cairnswk wrote:That's correctGilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?

I'm confused...cairnswk wrote:Ah Gilligan, because it is designed that wayGilligan wrote:How come Northbridge can't attack Nth Sydney?cairnswk wrote:That's correctGilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?

The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.Gilligan wrote: Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?
the wording could probably use a tinker.Bones2484 wrote:The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.Gilligan wrote: Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?
I agree, I had the initial confusion at first too.edbeard wrote:the wording could probably use a tinker.Bones2484 wrote:The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.Gilligan wrote: Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?
I'd remove the "(except for buses)" portion of that part of the legend to avoid confusion. The buses can attack other buses (or however it is phrased) is satisfactory on that end.

Agreed. and understood, i'll upload the new images to lackattack now.edbeard wrote:the wording could probably use a tinker.Bones2484 wrote:The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.Gilligan wrote: Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?
I'd remove the "(except for buses)" portion of that part of the legend to avoid confusion. The buses can attack other buses (or however it is phrased) is satisfactory on that end.

Lackattack, please could you upload these two new images below as per the forum request above to remove the phrase "except to buses" from the impassable section of the legend.cairnswk wrote:Agreed. and understood, i'll upload the new images to lackattack now.edbeard wrote:the wording could probably use a tinker.Bones2484 wrote:The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.Gilligan wrote: Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?
I'd remove the "(except for buses)" portion of that part of the legend to avoid confusion. The buses can attack other buses (or however it is phrased) is satisfactory on that end.


Hmmm - hate to say "I told you so"...!!edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.

Thanks C for your wisdom and the reminder that you were correct. However some of us older folk don't necessarily see things until experience teaches a lesson.yeti_c wrote:Hmmm - hate to say "I told you so"...!!edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.
C.

That's OK old man!!!!!cairnswk wrote:Thanks C for your wisdom and the reminder that you were correct. However some of us older folk don't necessarily see things until experience teaches a lesson.yeti_c wrote:Hmmm - hate to say "I told you so"...!!edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.
C.

i wonder if i'll be around to be able to call you that.yeti_c wrote:That's OK old man!!!!!cairnswk wrote:Thanks C for your wisdom and the reminder that you were correct. However some of us older folk don't necessarily see things until experience teaches a lesson.yeti_c wrote:Hmmm - hate to say "I told you so"...!!edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.
C.![]()
![]()
![]()
C.



let's just say its a simple "twist"Bones2484 wrote:As I said a few days ago, I like the map but I'm still rather curious as to why Olympic Park is completely separated from the rest of the territories that make up the same bonus?

part of why it's worth 6 armiescairnswk wrote:let's just say its a simple "twist"Bones2484 wrote:As I said a few days ago, I like the map but I'm still rather curious as to why Olympic Park is completely separated from the rest of the territories that make up the same bonus?