BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:While that appears to be a strong mandate, there is no way to be sure that the votes have actually been made by the players in the 17 games affected.
Agreed - as stated above - I voted yes because I would like the new version of the map up.
I'd probably endorse Lack ending the games for us and file it under "corrupt" game...like those that sometimes randomly happen when the server goes crazy.
I'm looking forward to playing the new version, however, i am in one of the active games, and i indend on staying in that and not abortinng it as it will be the last time i can ever play that map as it is, and plus, im quite enjoying it.
edit:
The poll is rediculous.
You cannot ask everyone on the forums who visit the thread to be voting on there - aobut ending a current game - because they're most likely not in one.
I believe that if you want a poll, hold a manuel poll and make them state their game number that they're in, just so you cant get random people who are bias on the matter.
AndyDufresne wrote:I'd probably endorse Lack ending the games for us and file it under "corrupt" game...like those that sometimes randomly happen when the server goes crazy.
--Andy
"I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
--Ripley
(seriously, I think that's the only way to ensure that these games end before the Mayan apocalypse in 2012)
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM
Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
There were no kills, people just deadbeated. No points have been transferred as of yet (since no one can eliminate the final territory of the players who have deadbeated.
There were no kills, people just deadbeated. No points have been transferred as of yet (since no one can eliminate the final territory of the players who have deadbeated.
I'm in favor of just ending it all. We've got a 5-way stalemate going on in the game I have with t-o-m and Albrio Shio, and though I have an advantage army-wise (I got two starting positions), it'll take forever for me to either get colluded against enough to lose, or for me to win.
BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:While that appears to be a strong mandate, there is no way to be sure that the votes have actually been made by the players in the 17 games affected.
How about if everyone votes in the chat for these games. PM everyone (because some may not read chat, especially in a long game like this). Give them a week to vote either yeah or nay. Maybe suggest folks use capitols and bold so the votes are easy to pick out amongst any other chat. Should not be too much hassle for Lack (or a helper) to check chat in 17 games in a week and then decide. IF it is even possible to just delete those games.
And as for the future .... I ABSOLUTELY would want a warning if a game is "not winnable". I am premium, but that doesn't mean I like to have a game go on forever, at least without warning!
There were no kills, people just deadbeated. No points have been transferred as of yet (since no one can eliminate the final territory of the players who have deadbeated.
Good detective work!
I'm in the same game, I already sugested to abort the game if at least 5 of the 6 players agree with that. That was 2 rounds ago, and only 1 respond. Later today I'm gonna PM the other players cause they might didn't read the chat.
If I know the results I'll post them here.
Tonight tonight the strip’s just right, I wanna blow `em off in my first heat
Summer’s here and the time is right, We’re goin’ racin’ in the street.....
All 6 players left in Game 2487019 allow to delete the game when needed
Untill then, we'll fight till the end
Tonight tonight the strip’s just right, I wanna blow `em off in my first heat
Summer’s here and the time is right, We’re goin’ racin’ in the street.....
t-o-m wrote:Why cant we just keep the current active games going whilst the new map comes in?
Cos the XML is massively changed - thus causing bad things to happen - see Treasures of Galapagos.
C.
As long as SOME of the territory names are the same, then some will be able to continue. lol
I vote that anyone currently involved in a game, gets a new game setup as soon as the new map comes out (players are added to the game automatically)
Got bugger all to do with the names... it's the indexes.
As there have been new territories added - the existing games won't have these territories - and the other territories may have been reindexed (i.e. if the territories have been added into the middle of the list and not the end)
Basically - it really wouldn't work.
What would work - is creating a different map name for it. i.e. Das Schloss v2 or something - so that the existing games carry on - and the new games stay... This will probably need to be done anyway - as the old games will have broken logs if the new XML superceeds the old XML. (The Logs are saved as indexes to territories and continents - not the names - if the XML changes the old logs change)