Moderator: Community Team





Snorri1234 wrote:I don't know about Defense not being in the top ten, but it is certainly less important that a lot of other things.
Hologram wrote:Economy, economy, economy.
And I'm not just saying that because of the clusterfuck our financial sector is in right now. But capital is the most driving force in the world, and the most economically stable nations will be the most powerful.
Followed closely by education. We either need to lower education standards and bring the US back to an industrial giant full of blue collar workers that don't know anything, or make everybody able to compete in a corporate environment. You choose America, lots of education or even less of it?
Foreign relations. Defense doesn't mean shit if we're diplomatically isolated. We need to strengthen our ties to our allies and stop being arrogant pricks when it comes to dealing with enemies.
This is after reducing all the corruption and partisanship in the government too. We seriously need to be able to find middle ground here.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis















Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.























Spuzzell wrote:Atkins and exercise.





Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
















Neoteny wrote:Education, for f*ck's sake. Everything else will follow. Really.



















Jenos Ridan wrote:5 people voted to reduce the US military to a priority no worth of a top ten. On a forum about a game which involves War?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
















Jenos Ridan wrote:Dude, under option two it holds the number two on priority, come on! And under option one, it's number three. Sounds "up there" to me.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
















Jenos Ridan wrote:So your responce is to scrap the military?
I'd see your point if it took into account how much more medical supplies (especially in large amounts) cost than textbooks, hence my putting healthcare in first place for option two.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
















Jenos Ridan wrote:So Education is first. I can live with that, so long as public education is not my only recourse.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
















Jenos Ridan wrote:Ideally, Defense, Law Enforcement and Education should not have to compete for first place, we should just fund them as if each are absolutely vital. Digressing to the topic of Education.
Something I noticed as far back as High School, that in the US it is a one-size-(supposedly)fits-all system. And that quite simply does not work. I'm thinking the better system is how the Germans and, for what I've been told and researched on my own, most of the rest of Europe and Japan do their schools; figure out early on which students are college material and which are better off learning a trade.
A good example of this sort of thing being done right now is to be found in something called Clark County Skills Center, which is a vocational program that offers training equivelent to a two-year college in a number of fields, including nursing, diesel mechanic and what they called Electro-Digital Technology, which I only did one year of.
So I would propose that we adopt the gymnasiums and vocational high schools that many other "first world" nations use. I'd still allow people to home school their children if they wish, so long as they pay an extra 3% or so on their property taxes or however the school district in which they live funds its schools, and allow private schools to take on the role of "magnet" schools to a greater degree (probably via the voucher system that Bush (at least, so people say) fought for). If someone wishs to retrain in another field, there is always community college (which nobody should sneer at).
Am I "talking arse" or do I really have something? If the former, then I'll drop this like a bag of cement.
It'd definitely be the most efficient way of educating.Jenos Ridan wrote:Of course this never got a nibble:Jenos Ridan wrote:Ideally, Defense, Law Enforcement and Education should not have to compete for first place, we should just fund them as if each are absolutely vital. Digressing to the topic of Education.
Something I noticed as far back as High School, that in the US it is a one-size-(supposedly)fits-all system. And that quite simply does not work. I'm thinking the better system is how the Germans and, for what I've been told and researched on my own, most of the rest of Europe and Japan do their schools; figure out early on which students are college material and which are better off learning a trade.
A good example of this sort of thing being done right now is to be found in something called Clark County Skills Center, which is a vocational program that offers training equivelent to a two-year college in a number of fields, including nursing, diesel mechanic and what they called Electro-Digital Technology, which I only did one year of.
So I would propose that we adopt the gymnasiums and vocational high schools that many other "first world" nations use. I'd still allow people to home school their children if they wish, so long as they pay an extra 3% or so on their property taxes or however the school district in which they live funds its schools, and allow private schools to take on the role of "magnet" schools to a greater degree (probably via the voucher system that Bush (at least, so people say) fought for). If someone wishs to retrain in another field, there is always community college (which nobody should sneer at).
Am I "talking arse" or do I really have something? If the former, then I'll drop this like a bag of cement.
Well, am I?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users