I recently remembered that when dog fighting became a huge issue (thanks Mike Vick!) several reporters compared it to hunting. Animal rights issues in general interest me, so I was wondering what you think.
So as not to taint the thread, I'll chime in later with my own thoughts.
But seriously, is there any good reason for denying animals the basic rights we afford other humans, like the right to life and individual liberty? Or is the only difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer that one is illegal "because the law says so"?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:But seriously, is there any good reason for denying animals the basic rights we afford other humans, like the right to life and individual liberty? Or is the only difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer that one is illegal "because the law says so"?
The difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer is one is a human and the other is a deer. Thats a great enough distinction that all others seem fairly insignificant. There is a difference between concerned about animal rights in respect of welfare and being vege/vegan or queueing up to chain yourself to the gates of your local medical research centre.
If you're a compassionate omnivore who enjoys a bit of steak that died happy clap your hands.
MeDeFe wrote:But seriously, is there any good reason for denying animals the basic rights we afford other humans, like the right to life and individual liberty? Or is the only difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer that one is illegal "because the law says so"?
The difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer is one is a human and the other is a deer. Thats a great enough distinction that all others seem fairly insignificant. There is a difference between concerned about animal rights in respect of welfare and being vege/vegan or queueing up to chain yourself to the gates of your local medical research centre.
If you're a compassionate omnivore who enjoys a bit of steak that died happy clap your hands.
MeDeFe wrote:But seriously, is there any good reason for denying animals the basic rights we afford other humans, like the right to life and individual liberty? Or is the only difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer that one is illegal "because the law says so"?
The difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer is one is a human and the other is a deer. Thats a great enough distinction that all others seem fairly insignificant. There is a difference between concerned about animal rights in respect of welfare and being vege/vegan or queueing up to chain yourself to the gates of your local medical research centre.
If you're a compassionate omnivore who enjoys a bit of steak that died happy clap your hands.
MeDeFe wrote:But seriously, is there any good reason for denying animals the basic rights we afford other humans, like the right to life and individual liberty? Or is the only difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer that one is illegal "because the law says so"?
Let us get "human rights" taken care of before we concentrate on animals. It is my opinion that human life is just a tad more valuable than animal life.
(btw some people eat those deer they shoot)
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
I think animal rights stop after cruelty to animals. Define that, and problem sovled. I don't want to evict a gopher from my yard only to find that he's been living there for three weeks so I was supposed to file some paperwork.
Also, the droz test is cruelty to animals.
So far there are no arguments from the side that would deny animals their rights, it all boils down to "because I say so", at least jay was honest enough to openly state that it was his opinion that the life of a human is more valuable than the life of an animal.
But why is that? What're your reasons for thinking like that, jay and others?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.
Natural does not equal moral.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
strike wolf wrote:It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.
Natural does not equal moral.
Maybe not but it's good enough for me.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.
Natural does not equal moral.
Nor does unnatural.
Either God designed me to be able to be carnivorous, or my ancestors evolved that way for good reason. Either way it's good enough for me.
Cruelty is another matter, and as a species we treat our food-providing animals (both those we eat and those we milk or take eggs from) very badly in most cases. But this is a different question.
strike wolf wrote:It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.
Natural does not equal moral.
Nor does unnatural.
Either God designed me to be able to be carnivorous, or my ancestors evolved that way for good reason. Either way it's good enough for me.
Cruelty is another matter, and as a species we treat our food-providing animals (both those we eat and those we milk or take eggs from) very badly in most cases. But this is a different question.
As an avid meat eater I agree.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
strike wolf wrote:It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.
Natural does not equal moral.
Nor does unnatural.
Either God designed me to be able to be carnivorous, or my ancestors evolved that way for good reason. Either way it's good enough for me.
Cruelty is another matter, and as a species we treat our food-providing animals (both those we eat and those we milk or take eggs from) very badly in most cases. But this is a different question.
Have you taken a good look at your teeth? Not much carnivorous to speak of there.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.