Moderator: Cartographers
 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		
 The Neon Peon
				The Neon Peon
			












 
		The Neon Peon wrote:I understood it clearly before, but I think the wording could be improved on the black hole bonus. why not just leave it at "-3 per bonus area held"? that is how most other maps do it.
 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		 bbqpenguin
				bbqpenguin
			





 
		bbqpenguin wrote:black hole thing is a little hard to read
 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		rsacheli wrote:bbqpenguin wrote:black hole thing is a little hard to read
will be fixed shortly... anything else?
 bbqpenguin
				bbqpenguin
			





 
		 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		
 The Neon Peon
				The Neon Peon
			












 
		 bbqpenguin
				bbqpenguin
			





 
		The Neon Peon wrote:Make it a negative bonus per continent held, not the whole "+ # of continent held"
Simply have it read: "-5 per bonus region held"
 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		rsacheli wrote:The Neon Peon wrote:Make it a negative bonus per continent held, not the whole "+ # of continent held"
Simply have it read: "-5 per bonus region held"
I want there to be a negative just for holding it even if no additional bonuses are held... how would you suggest I do this?
 bbqpenguin
				bbqpenguin
			





 
		 funny that the Aquarius is in Air when its got the most to do with Water
 funny that the Aquarius is in Air when its got the most to do with Water
 drake_259
				drake_259
			

















 
		drake_259 wrote::) funny that the Aquarius is in Air when its got the most to do with Water
 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		rsacheli wrote:drake_259 wrote::) funny that the Aquarius is in Air when its got the most to do with Water
i thought that too...........
 bbqpenguin
				bbqpenguin
			





 
		 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		
 benny profane
				benny profane
			







 
		
 mibi
				mibi
			




 
			benny profane wrote:But lemme see if I get these bonuses right.
Let's say I hold Pisces, Scorpio, and Cancer.
For holding each of those, I'll get a total of 20 armies.
Is the Elemental (or Seasonal, as the case may be) bonus on top of that, leading to me actually getting 33 armies?
 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		rsacheli wrote:benny profane wrote:But lemme see if I get these bonuses right.
Let's say I hold Pisces, Scorpio, and Cancer.
For holding each of those, I'll get a total of 20 armies.
Is the Elemental (or Seasonal, as the case may be) bonus on top of that, leading to me actually getting 33 armies?
That is correct, the seasonal/elemental bonuses are in addition to the bonuses recieved by the individual constellations. Is that too much?
 bbqpenguin
				bbqpenguin
			





 
		bbqpenguin wrote:rsacheli wrote:benny profane wrote:But lemme see if I get these bonuses right.
Let's say I hold Pisces, Scorpio, and Cancer.
For holding each of those, I'll get a total of 20 armies.
Is the Elemental (or Seasonal, as the case may be) bonus on top of that, leading to me actually getting 33 armies?
That is correct, the seasonal/elemental bonuses are in addition to the bonuses recieved by the individual constellations. Is that too much?
i kind of don't think so. it'll still be very difficult to hold 1 individual constellation, and the difficulty of getting an element makes it that much harder because of the amount of borders you'd have to maintain. seasons should be easier to hold than elements (fewer borders to defend) so i think you should decrease the bonus for holding them so that they're a bit lower than the element bonuses
 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		
 benny profane
				benny profane
			







 
		benny profane wrote:Agreed. I would tentatively suggest:
Summer +8
Fall +8
Winter +7
Spring +7
 rsacheli
				rsacheli
			








 
		
 benny profane
				benny profane
			







 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users