Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
maxatstuy wrote:Concise description:Specifics:
- A distinction when foeing someone that enables you to block someone from playing a game without necessarily blocking their chat
This will improve the following aspects of the site:
- A separate foe button for chat and for games
- Game foe can prevent someone from joining your games
- Chat foe can block their comments
- The foe that exists already can be left alone and fully ignores someone; and the game and chat foe can be a choice lifted after putting someone on foe so that you can still read their posts or their game chat while not having to worry about them joining your games
- When placing a mod on foe, the chat foe will automatically be disabled but it would still allow you to prevent them from joining your games
- There is no reason why someones posts, or comments should be blocked if you only want to avoid playing the person
- We are currently unable to foe mods because it is important that we read their warnings and comments, this can prevent them from feeling awkward about joining games where they believe that they are unwelcome
- Some people are truly obnoxious, so while their chat may not be appreciated, their presence in a game might not be resented
InsomniaRed wrote:I think if this were to be divided, the simplest way would be Forum Foe vs Game Foe (and of course the option of both, if preferred)
I do not think that foe-ing people from writing in game chat yet still being able to play with them is necessarily smart because I feel that has potential to have others bring up C&A threads about secret alliances, when in fact, they just couldn't read their chat! I figure, if you're in a game with someone, you can deal with reading their chat (or you could simply ignore it, if playing games with them means so much to you) Now making it unable for them to comment in game chats of your OTHER games which they are not in, I mean that'd be nice, but I really don't see this happening. Too complicated and too much trouble for the limited perks.
I think if this were to be implemented it would be a two way street. You could ignore players from games AND forums, just games, or just forums. I really feel this whole 'game chat foe' is more trouble than what it's worth, but the separate foes (games/forums) idea has potential.
-Insom
danryan wrote:New Foe Options:
- Forum Ignore
- Game Ignore
This will improve the following aspects of the site:
- There are members with whom you don't mind chatting or reading posts, but with whom you'd rather not play.
- A game block only would prevent them from joining your game, but you could still read their posts, wall posts, etc.
jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea!
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.
the.killing.44 wrote:jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea!
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.
You foe people because they have bad avatars?!
hahaha3hahaha wrote:Woodruff wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea!
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.
You foe people because they have bad avatars?!
Look at his name...
Woah what a huge generalisation. I respected you til you said that hahaha. I'm a Christian, does that mean I foe people because of their avatars also?
hahaha3hahaha wrote:Woodruff wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea!
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.
You foe people because they have bad avatars?!
Look at his name...
Woah what a huge generalisation. I respected you til you said that hahaha. I'm a Christian, does that mean I foe people because of their avatars also?
Woodruff wrote:danryan wrote:New Foe Options:
- Forum Ignore
- Game Ignore
This will improve the following aspects of the site:
- There are members with whom you don't mind chatting or reading posts, but with whom you'd rather not play.
- A game block only would prevent them from joining your game, but you could still read their posts, wall posts, etc.
A great idea. I like it a lot for precisely the reasons you state.
However, before this is implemented, lackattack should fix the fact that YOU CAN JOIN GAMES OF SOMEONE WHOM YOU HAVE FOED, which has been on his to-do list for more than three years now.
jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea!
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.
TurinTurambar wrote:jesusfreak16 wrote:Great idea!
Most of the people on my foe list are users with avatars I don't want to see, but I wouldn't mind playing with them.
Another option for you:
Under control panel, you can turn off the option to show avatars and signatures.
Robinette wrote:Kaskavel wrote:Seriously. Who is the female conqueror of CC?
Depends on what metric you use...
The coolest is squishyg
fumandomuerte wrote:I support this.
Check this other suggestion http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=114299&start=0.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users