Machiavelli wrote:You are basically saying wicked was stupid.
perchance… but no. I was saying claiming is foolish. Explanation a few lines down.
Machiavelli wrote:Then when I post nearly as much info, you say it is meaningless. I agree that what I posted doesn’t help the town a lot, but it doesn’t hurt the town at all, so I don’t see why it’s a big deal. The more we talk, the more info we have.
True it doesn’t help the town. False: it doesn’t hurt the town. When people start claiming(and they have, I believe two have already claimed vanilla townie) it doesn’t help the town at all, especial when there are no votes towards the person. It lets the person play a mind game with the information you just gave them. And as always true no matter the person, the one who gets to analyze will win the mind game
Machiavelli wrote: dagreatbroomhead wrote:Machiavelli wrote:A good mafia member will not just jump on bandwagons. You have a good point.
A good towniewill not jump on bandwagons either.
Nice circular logic dude, that means no good player will ever bee the third or forth to vote. Impossible.
I always thought that bandwagoning was voting quickly, without hearing all the facts and without everyone getting to tell their side of the story. I have never heard of anyone considering it bandwagoning just for being the third person to vote. If you use my definition of bandwagoning in my quote, then it does make sense.
Misunderstanding, I always thought that bandwagonng was jumping on the “bandwagon” after other people had voted for someone without having any logic towards it.
wicked wrote:I for one would like to hear broomhead's name and 2 sentences about his charactar. Is that why you didn't want that to continue? Because yours is too damning?
seriously, I could lie to you, and you wouldn’t know the difference. But I won’t for one rule of mine. Lynch all liars. If you lie, you deserve to die. So understand I am doing this under full protest. I am claiming no abilities or flavor that leads to abilities. That doesn’t mean I do or don’t have them, just not claiming them. Lee Jacobs a healthy townie. I am an escaped convict. I escaped yesterday, and made it here right away….yes I stole a car. I came here because I listened to news radio.
P.S. as I re-looked over my PM I saw my mission, eliminate all CHI -2 infected people, meaning that they are our targets, they are our mafia, these are the ones we need to kill. At least as I understand it.
trestain wrote:I still don't feel we need to kill someone yet.
I do have a few suspicions but thats all they are. I think we should see what the night brings. So as i said on my first post no death = no lynch,
vote-no lynch
okay remember how I said that there are worse moves out there? Well he is one no lynch. To quickly break the WHOLE game down (all mafia games) there is the small but informaed mafia, who get to kill at night, verses the large and confused town who get one vote intermingled with the mafia. Mafia get to talk and plan, the town gets to be confused. Mafia get to make a kill at night, town gets to get 1/16th of a vote, minus the mafia votes to make a kill. Basically the ONLY power of the town is to vote and kill, if we never vote, then we never kill any mafia. There is no way the town can win if we do not vote and kill.
P.S. it turns out that there are two votes for no lynch, does anyone know what page the other one is on? I don’t remember seeing it.
Backglass wrote:Once the disease takes hold it should be more clear WHO is infected and WHO is not. We should then be able to proceed in a orderly and Scientific way!
yeah, lets the mafia infect others so the odds are even worse. That sounds like a good plan. Especially since we won’t gain information from night kills because maybe there aren’t any.
Please think hard.