Moderator: Community Team
spiesr wrote:*snip*
captainwalrus wrote:Unvote
Vote stroop
He is very suspicious. First he tried to vote no lyinch to save himself because the situation was very good following mpjh's no lynch vote. Then, once he realised how suspicious it looked, he changed and claimed to think it was odd that there was 3 votes for no lynch. Very suspicious.
So what do you think we should do? Not lynch at all because we might accidentally lynch a pro-town power role?kagetora wrote:None of us know all of the roles out there. There could be multiple angels, or gun-owners, or seers/cops, and heck, Nate could have made up some roles specifically for this game. So really, it wouldn't surprise me if we accidentally lynched someone with an important pro-town role
I don't think the first half of that post was meant to be taken seriously. Therefor, stroop should be more careful to only say things that he means because not everyone can figure that out.derfderf34 wrote:yes at the beginning of one of his posts he said that he would try to convince us to vote no lynch and then unvoted his no lynch
[/quote]What do you mean by saying I wrote *snip*? Why quote me if you plan on deleting the entire text of the quote?spiesr wrote:*snip*
kagetora wrote:There could be multiple angels, or gun-owners, or seers/cops, and heck, Nate could have made up some roles specifically for this game
kagetora wrote:Also based on the role I have, I know there is no angel/doc.
spiesr wrote:Also check out this sweet contradiction here. (Bolding Mine)kagetora wrote:There could be multiple angels, or gun-owners, or seers/cops, and heck, Nate could have made up some roles specifically for this gamekagetora wrote:Also based on the role I have, I know there is no angel/doc.
kagetora wrote:spiesr wrote:*snip*
I might.
I don't feel like total role-claiming right now. But trust me, the townies do not want to lose the Cult-Killers.
Yes, I am purposely painting a target on my head to make the game interesting.
kagetora wrote:I don't remember saying all of those things. But hey, feel free to lynch me. I still vote no lynch.
And I find it amazing that people go back and look at every little thing I said.
Also, it may not be interesting to you guys, but I find it hilarious. "Kage has no idea what's saying. Contradictions here, silence here, talking to much here. He must be crazy" Pretty much what I was going for.
kagetora wrote:Well I haven't played much Mafia, so this is sort of an experiment to see what people's reactions are for me. And I find it funny.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
spiesr wrote:What do you mean by saying I wrote *snip*? Why quote me if you plan on deleting the entire text of the quote?
kagetora wrote:Also, it may not be interesting to you guys, but I find it hilarious. "Kage has no idea what's saying. Contradictions here, silence here, talking to much here. He must be crazy" Pretty much what I was going for.
mpjh wrote:I agree, but before he does can we check to make sure everyone has posted at least once. My records show that ace has not posted.
kagetora wrote:Yes there can be.
None of us know all of the roles out there. There could be multiple angels, or gun-owners, or seers/cops, and heck, Nate could have made up some roles specifically for this game. So really, it wouldn't surprise me if we accidentally lynched someone with an important pro-town role
Are you trying to get yourself lynched? Becuase that was almost as bad as kagetora and you are suppossed to be more experianced...derfderf34 wrote:Then if we lynch all the pro town power roles the game is free to become a faction game
mpjh wrote:I don't believe he is scum
mpjh wrote:I guess I should have said I don't believe he is a cult leader.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users