Moderator: Clan Directors
Knight2254 wrote:The clan league should really be a mix of singles, doubles, trips, and quads. Having it all doubles is just silly.
ClockworK wrote:JP,
is there any way you could hold back on updating the Standings until the end of the played week? I think it would be less work for you, and it would be nice to see the results after each weeks games are wrapped up for everyone...it gives the players a clearer vision of where they stand from week to week....some teams finish their games quick while others are slower, and it would be nice to see updates uniformly.
just my opinion....comments?
btw, great work on the league...it has made CC that much better!
jpcloet wrote:http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3372/3256614490_dbd002d6cb_o.jpg
Optimus Prime wrote:The system is not flawed if it was intentionally designed to rank clans according to total wins. Some rankings use winning percentage, others use total wins. Just because you want to be on top doesn't mean the system is flawed, Blitzaholic.
jpcloet wrote:Uses the same calculation as American Baseball. Done because not all clans play every week. Hence an early bye week would compromise total wins.
Think about it this way then.
ID is 5 games over .500
THOTA is only 4 games over .500
Would a clan who currently sits at 1-0 be top spot? (rhetorical question)
You can rectify the situation in your current matchup. Let your games do the talking.
Knight2254 wrote:Why don't you just finish your games and then we'll be able to see who is really in first. This is just a temp scoreboard anyways.
Blitzaholic wrote:jpcloet wrote:Uses the same calculation as American Baseball. Done because not all clans play every week. Hence an early bye week would compromise total wins.
Think about it this way then.
ID is 5 games over .500
THOTA is only 4 games over .500
Would a clan who currently sits at 1-0 be top spot? (rhetorical question)
You can rectify the situation in your current matchup. Let your games do the talking.
and 3rd place team says 11-8 and only 1 game back???????
it should be more than 1 game back from 12-7, say the 12-7 team lost, and is now 12-8, that is 1 game, but still better than 11-8, so it should be at least 1.5 from the 12-7 record
and 11-8 would be even more back then a 7-3 record.
re-read
jpcloet wrote:ID can join as slowly as they like, I am watching the games though.
12-7 vs 11-8, if the second team wins, being 1 back is now even. 12-8 and 12-8. It's only a full game if the teams are playing each other.
TheBro wrote:But he's totally right here! Not sure about the baseball argument, doesn't the team with a better win % rank higher?
Bones2484 wrote:TheBro wrote:But he's totally right here! Not sure about the baseball argument, doesn't the team with a better win % rank higher?
No. Baseball assumes 50/50 split. As was said, by your logic a team that is 1-0 would be in first place.
Right now, Dragoons have 5 more wins and 4 more losses than THOTA. Meaning THOTA should be a half game behind, as they are.
The standings are correct, but who cares? It only matters who is on top at the end. If THOTA is that concerned with their current place, perhaps they can finish off a few more games?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users