Moderator: Community Team
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0lc1dg8MVg&feature=channel
InkL0sed wrote:What's frightening about it?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
InkL0sed wrote:Well. An economy is healthy when money is circulating. Money is worthless if nobody uses it.
pimpdave wrote:Everyone who wrote no should have to protect themselves when the riots start. They don't get police protection, cause there won't be any flippin money to fund them.
InkL0sed wrote:Well. An economy is healthy when money is circulating. Money is worthless if nobody uses it.
Napoleon Ier wrote:FDR?
muy_thaiguy wrote:InkL0sed wrote:Well. An economy is healthy when money is circulating. Money is worthless if nobody uses it.
Circulating, yes. Dumping piles of money everywhere, not so much. Nor is shifting most of the money to one market in particular, while leaving others out to dry, as this and dumping billions into it is not going to increase value at all. Just look at Zimbabwe, or post Nazi Germany. Or 1930s US. It took a power hungry, psycopathic, racist dictator to get the world's economy going again.
Juan_Bottom wrote:If Ink is giving increadibly vauge and generalized answers; Ask him to be more specific.
Simon Viavant wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:If Ink is giving increadibly vauge and generalized answers; Ask him to be more specific.
Can I ask you and some others in this thread to take econ 101 and then come back to this thread in a year?
Napoleon Ier wrote:FDR?
cutebastard71 wrote:Not always, just circulating is not sufficient. Before WWII Germans circulated quite a bit of money but not too many of them were wealthy. Or take even Zimbabwe these days.
InkL0sed wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:InkL0sed wrote:Well. An economy is healthy when money is circulating. Money is worthless if nobody uses it.
Circulating, yes. Dumping piles of money everywhere, not so much. Nor is shifting most of the money to one market in particular, while leaving others out to dry, as this and dumping billions into it is not going to increase value at all. Just look at Zimbabwe, or post Nazi Germany. Or 1930s US. It took a power hungry, psycopathic, racist dictator to get the world's economy going again.
No, it took spending. Compare our deficit now to the deficit of WWII.
And Nappy, I was answering your question. Money being circulated increases overall wealth.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
pimpdave wrote:I hate everyone who doesn't support the stimulus bill.
Like, with a clenched jaw kind of hate.
captainwalrus wrote:The bill needs a lot taken out but 2 main things added.
1 MORE INFASTRUCTURE!
2 MORE COWBELL!
pimpdave wrote:I hate everyone who doesn't support the stimulus bill.
Like, with a clenched jaw kind of hate.
Frigidus wrote:captainwalrus wrote:The bill needs a lot taken out but 2 main things added.
1 MORE INFASTRUCTURE!
2 MORE COWBELL!
Man, if CC ran the world everything would be so much better.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users